Maxpreps colorado football

Northern Colorado Northern Colorado @ Northern Iowa Northern Iowa
Game Start Time: 1:00 PM ET
Location: UNI-Dome, Cedar Falls, IA
Watch: MVC Network

Team	Coach(es)	Offense	Defense
Northern Colorado Northern Colorado	qc_undercover	Spread	4-3
Northern Iowa Northern Iowa	lurtcho	Spread	4-3

Northern Colorado Northern Colorado

Total Passing Yards	Total Rushing Yards	Total Yards	Interceptions Lost	Fumbles Lost	Field Goals	Time of Possession	Timeouts
0 yards	0 yards	0 yards	0	0	0/0	0:00	3

Northern Iowa Northern Iowa

Total Passing Yards	Total Rushing Yards	Total Yards	Interceptions Lost	Fumbles Lost	Field Goals	Time of Possession	Timeouts
0 yards	0 yards	0 yards	0	0	0/0	0:00	3

Clock	Quarter	Down	Ball Location	Possession	Playclock	Deadline
7:00	1	1st & 10	35 Northern Iowa	Northern Iowa	03/23 11:25 AM EST	04/01 09:36 AM EST

Team	Q1	Q2	Q3	Q4	Total
Northern Iowa	0	0	0	0	0
Northern Colorado	0	0	0	0	0

Unable to generate play list
Waiting on a response from lurtcho to this comment.
^{Admin: Restart Edit Northern Colorado Edit Northern Iowa Rerun play Pause Chew Abandon}

Syracuse Syracuse @ Colorado Colorado
Game Start Time: 8:00 PM ET
Location: Folsom Field, Boulder, CO
Watch: Pac-12 Network

Team	Coach(es)	Offense	Defense
Syracuse Syracuse	king_kong1231	Spread	4-3
Colorado Colorado	daveydut	Spread	3-4

Syracuse Syracuse

Total Passing Yards	Total Rushing Yards	Total Yards	Interceptions Lost	Fumbles Lost	Field Goals	Time of Possession	Timeouts
0 yards	26 yards	26 yards	1	0	0/0	1:17	3

Colorado Colorado

Total Passing Yards	Total Rushing Yards	Total Yards	Interceptions Lost	Fumbles Lost	Field Goals	Time of Possession	Timeouts
0 yards	9 yards	9 yards	0	0	0/0	0:49	3

Drive Summary
home for 9 yards in 49 seconds ending in turnover

Clock	Quarter	Down	Ball Location	Possession	Playclock	Deadline
4:54	1	1st & 10	3 Syracuse	Colorado	03/23 06:49 PM EST	04/01 09:00 AM EST

Team	Q1	Q2	Q3	Q4	Total
Colorado	6	0	0	0	6
Syracuse	0	0	0	0	0

Plays
Waiting on a response from daveydut to this comment.
^{Admin: Restart Edit Syracuse Edit Colorado Rerun play Pause Chew Abandon}

Texas Tech Texas Tech @ Air Force Air Force
Game Start Time: 3:45 PM ET
Location: Falcon Stadium, Colorado Springs, CO
Watch: FSPN+

Team	Coach(es)	Offense	Defense
Texas Tech Texas Tech	xemyrlexasey	Air	4-3
Air Force Air Force	calebafugate	Flexbone	3-4

Texas Tech Texas Tech

Total Passing Yards	Total Rushing Yards	Total Yards	Interceptions Lost	Fumbles Lost	Field Goals	Time of Possession	Timeouts
-6 yards	0 yards	-6 yards	0	0	0/0	0:18	3

Air Force Air Force

Total Passing Yards	Total Rushing Yards	Total Yards	Interceptions Lost	Fumbles Lost	Field Goals	Time of Possession	Timeouts
0 yards	0 yards	0 yards	0	0	0/0	0:00	3

Clock	Quarter	Down	Ball Location	Possession	Playclock	Deadline
6:42	1	3rd & 16	19 Texas Tech	Texas Tech	03/23 06:57 PM EST	04/01 08:52 AM EST

Team	Q1	Q2	Q3	Q4	Total
Air Force	0	0	0	0	0
Texas Tech	0	0	0	0	0

Plays
Waiting on a response from xemyrlexasey to this comment.
^{Admin: Restart Edit Texas Tech Edit Air Force Rerun play Pause Chew Abandon}

Colorado State Colorado State @ Maryland Maryland
Game Start Time: 2:15 PM ET
Location: Maryland Stadium, College Park, MD
Watch: Big Ten Network

Team	Coach(es)	Offense	Defense
Colorado State Colorado State	biggusdickusfromwome	Spread	3-3-5
Maryland Maryland	haysack01	Air	4-4

Colorado State Colorado State

Total Passing Yards	Total Rushing Yards	Total Yards	Interceptions Lost	Fumbles Lost	Field Goals	Time of Possession	Timeouts
31 yards	0 yards	31 yards	0	0	0/0	0:14	3

Maryland Maryland

Total Passing Yards	Total Rushing Yards	Total Yards	Interceptions Lost	Fumbles Lost	Field Goals	Time of Possession	Timeouts
10 yards	21 yards	31 yards	0	1	0/0	1:30	3

Drive Summary
home for 31 yards in 90 seconds ending in turnover
away for 31 yards in 9 seconds ending in touchdown

Clock	Quarter	Down	Ball Location	Possession	Playclock	Deadline
5:16	1	1st & 10	35 Colorado State	Colorado State	03/23 06:49 PM EST	04/01 08:41 AM EST

Team	Q1	Q2	Q3	Q4	Total
Maryland	0	0	0	0	0
Colorado State	7	0	0	0	7

Plays
Waiting on a response from biggusdickusfromwome to this comment.
^{Admin: Restart Edit Colorado State Edit Maryland Rerun play Pause Chew Abandon}

Anyone else thinks for U10 it’s better to work on proper passing and receiving, shot power, and monkey in middle type games versus setting up a whole field of cones for drills they barely understand? I’m talking rec kids not club.
Edit: thanks for the replies. I’m so glad I asked. It’s good to know there’s a community out there. As an elaboration, I’m in Texas and my rec league is actually U9 Boys. The boys are 7, 8 and we have one 10 year old (an older brother). We have 12 and we play 7v7. I’ve been their coach for 4 seasons and this is my third year. My son is on this team too and hope to continue to coach him. I played one season of soccer around 8 years old and chose ice hockey (grew up in Colorado), then football in high school. I happened to start playing pickup soccer at lunchtime at my first job and loved it.

Trying to match back into California for residency. I like the location better RVUCOM Colorado and closer to home but it seems like MSUCOM is a more reputable school (plus has a football team).
​
The main goal is to match back into California for residency regardless of what specialty I choose. Would be happy at either school. Similar COA as well but MSUCOM does have a more robust scholarship situation to offer their first years. Would be taking my significant other with me and she much prefers Parker CO over East Lansing which is also affecting my decision.
​
Any advice?

Player 247 profile page
Source
Made with the /CFB Recruiting Post Generator

https://athlonsports.com/college-football/colorado-no-longer-holds-football-commitment-from-wr-daijon-calimon
https://247sports.com/playedaijon-calimon-46129290/

Well Off Media by Deion Sanders Jr - https://www.youtube.com/@welloffmedia
Reach the People Media by Darius Sanders - https://www.youtube.com/@ReachThePeople
Thee Pregame Show by Uncle Neely - https://www.youtube.com/@theepregameshow

They began the conversation by talking about Women's Basketball, which I left out.
Utah President Taylor Randall (TR) Radio Host Bill Riley (BR)
Bill Riley: I wanted to ask you today, about several of your colleagues who've spoken out about the ever-wanting Pac-12 Media Rights Deal. Can you tell curious Utah fans what your expectations are and where we stand right now?
Taylor Randall: Sure, I'd be happy to comment a bit. First, I'd like to say that we still see tremendous value in the 10 teams remaining in the Pac ahh... 12, I guess that's Pac 10 for now. We have a strong, strong set of brands. The way I think about the value of a league and what comes out as the value of a contract is really three things:
First, you gotta have strong brands, which we have.
Second, you have to have teams that are actually going to win and create great matchups. And if you look at our league next year, even leaving SC and UCLA out, you've got four teams that are probably ranked in the top 25. And anytime you have top 25 ranked teams playing that creates interest and value. So our value is up there.
And the final thing is, do you have to have the right media distribution so that the fans can actually watch. Right now we're in the middle of those, and I can't tell you much about them while they're ongoing, but I'm confident that we have the right people at the table and that they're seeing our value the same way we're seeing it. And you'd always like to have an agreement sooner rather than later, but you have to remember that if not for what happened last summer negotiations would just be starting right now, not wrapping up. There's been a lot of comments from the media about how this is taking a long time, but it's really that we started a year earlier than expected. So on our end, as Presidents, we've been really patient with the negotiations because they're happening on an advanced timeline and will be done ahead of the original schedule regardless of when it comes through. I think we're in a good spot, and I like what I'm hearing out of the President's office both in terms of compensation and in distribution. I think we've still got a ways to go, but I think we've got solidarity in the President's room of the remaining schools in particular. I don't talk to a President from one of the remaining schools who's not confident in the deal that's being worked on.
Bill Riley: So, talking about that, we've been told November, December, and it keeps getting pushed back. Has there been hold ups? What's keeping this from being finalized?
Taylor Randall: Well, I don't think there were any serious expectations that it would be done now. We've all felt all along that we were going to be patient and let things play out. If anything, some Presidents have wondered why we're doing a media deal a year earlier than scheduled. So we're going to be patient and make sure it's a deal that works for us and preserves the long-term value of our conference. So I'm not... you know... I guess I'd just say that we feel we're in a really good spot right now and things are progressing well.
Bill Riley: Your colleague, Dr. Robbins, from Arizona, was very vocal last week on television and in print saying that he expected the deal from what he's seen to be as good, if not better, than the deal the Big-12 got. Do you feel the same way?
Taylor Randall: I think we're all optimistic like Bobby is. We've got a lot of value in our conference.
Bill Riley: What have you made of some of the Big-12 Media's, some might say, apocalyptic projections for the end of the Pac-12 Conference? When you guys get together as a CEO group, has there been any discussion of that coverage? Have you seen it, read it, what do you make of it?
Taylor Randall: You know, all of us that are sports fans have heard and read that coverage. I would say that it runs somewhat contrary to the discussions that I have with our Presidents. It's a great group of individuals. We discuss openly what we think our strengths are. Again, I think we love the set of schools and the values that we bring and where we're trying to go with our athletic programs. We've always enjoyed friendly competition with one another. So I don't think we see a dire scenario.
Bill Riley: Yet there's been a lot of reporting, Taylor, of the 4 Corners Schools of which you are one. Arizona, Arizona State, Colorado, and Utah. Being in talks and negotiations with the Big-12 conference. Now I'm not sure what the sourcing is on these stories, but is there any truth to those?
Taylor Randall: Well, let me just say again that we are in solidarity with our Pac-12 President peers. We are working to get a deal that is beneficial to all of us as a conference. That said, we certainly think the Big-12 has put together a great conference with some great schools as well; but right now we think staying in solidarity with our Pac-12 schools is the right place to be.
Bill Riley: Is expansion something you guys have discussed? I know that you guys have given George Kliavkoff as a CEO group the power to explore it. Should we expect expansion to be part of this media rights deal, or is that something separate in and of itself?
Taylor Randall: Yeah.... You know, I think the way we're thinking about it is that it could happen together or it could happen separately. You need to know that conferences are always talking about expansion, and certainly you talk about it more when you're in the middle of media rights deals. But we've got a ways to go before we make public announcements. We've got a lot to consider and we're going to be smart about that decision.
Bill Riley: I tell people all the time that expansion happens at a University level. It doesn't just happen at an Athletics level. And as much as we in this world where I operate, in a world of sports, the movement of a university from one conference to another happens at a university level. So that's not necessarily something that happens within Athletics, it's done with Athletics as part of that. When you guys get together as a CEO group and talk about that, if you guys were to expand, what qualities, what are the things you guys are discussing with regards to growing the conference?
Taylor Randall: You know, it's an interesting discussion because all of it has unique characteristics that each school is looking at. I can speak about it from the perspective of the University of Utah. We look at our Alumni footprint, right, and we look at where we would like to be and where we like to be able to grow. We look at the academic affiliations that we can have with other schools, which is a really big part of it. Without a doubt our belonging to the Pac-12 has not only allowed us to recruit great faculty, but increased collaborations with great faculty all over the conference. The faculty connections is a really big deal for our university.
So those are a couple of the things that we look at, and then we do actually talk about athletic considerations. You know, where do our coaches want to be in terms of a footprint, the travel burden on students. Right now I think a lot of us are thinking about league composition, you know, we're keeping an eye on the evolution of the NCAA and the CFP. We all want to be National Champions, right? So there's trade offs, you know, you're in different leagues that are composed differently for different sports, so you think about how conference membership affects if you're going to have a shot at those national championships. That's also valuable to an institution.
Bill Riley: Does a market, as well as the university, affect that as well? Because I know that your university is certainly part of that, but is the market that you're in part of that too, or does that not matter so much?
Taylor Randall: Oh, yeah, of course. And I guess that's part of what I talk about when I talk about the footprint and I include that. But there's some great brands out there that transcend markets. And, to an extent, the University of Utah is in a market that's growing, but we've also got to transcend markets.
Bill Riley: You were in the University when it expanded from the Mountain West to the Pac-12. You were in a different role then than you are today, but what was your reaction when you heard that news... whatever it was, 13 years ago, and now the position you're in today with the conference possibly growing again?
Taylor Randall: From my seat 13 years ago, I was the Dean of the Eccles School of Business, um, it was fantastic. We knew that we were going to be able to draw students from certain geographic areas that we hadn't been able to draw from before. And we continue to see that. And I think that's one of the lenses you use to look at expansion as a conference president in terms of conference composition. What areas do you want to have influence and draw from and certainly the conference footprint has influence on that.
Bill Riley: Last thing, because I know you've gotta run. You and I have talked about this offline about championship games and the Rose Bowl as well, give the listeners an idea of what the success the football program has had, especially the past 2, 3, 4 years, has had for the University as a whole.
Taylor Randall: Well, I'll just say one line: We have a record number of deposits for the University at this time. So, it has drawn incredible positive attention for the University, and in terms of enrollment we're looking at another very, very strong year. When the majority of institutions are in decline.
At this point they wrap things up and say their goodbyes.
My thoughts:

• Expansion seems like a foregone conclusion. Essentially saying it'll happen.
• Randall sees the media narrative of pressure to complete a deal to be just the media talking; they don't feel the pressure.
• Academic connections matter to Utah in terms of conference affiliation.
• Being attached to markets that give Utah good applicants matters to the president.
• He avoided the question a bit on talking about joining the Big-12, saying it wasn't a good fit at this time but not denying that they've talked.
• He thinks the deal that they end up with will be a good one, but indicates that it's not imminent.

New Colorado football coach Deion Sanders made at least one thing very clear to his players ahead of spring football practice — they’re going to have to earn everything down to the numbers on their jerseys. Well Off Media posted a video Sunday of Sanders addressing his team and laying out the ground rules from … Continue reading Colorado’s Deion Sanders lays out rules for jersey numbers: ‘Everything you do around here will be earned’

The term "blue blood" is obviously used a lot in college sports, and there seems to be a broad consensus among fans of what programs could definitely be considered blue bloods. I thought of 16 programs that you could pretty clearly state are blue bloods without much controversy: Alabama, Auburn, Clemson, Georgia, Florida, Florida State, LSU, Michigan, Nebraska, Notre Dame, Ohio State, Oklahoma, Penn State, Tennessee, Texas, USC. All of these programs reach the following benchmarks, or have good excuses for not doing so:
- All of these programs all have multiple claimed national titles, with at least one in the last 40 years.
- All but 1 program are in the top 21 in total wins (FSU, which has played at least 50 fewer seasons than some of these other schools),
- Everyone is in the top 23 in win percentage. .
- Everyone is in the top 27 of the Wall Street Journal's most recent College Football Value Rankings.*
*This list has not been updated since 2020, but its the most reliable one I could find. https://graphics.wsj.com/table/NCAA_2019
But what about some programs on the borderline? Do you think that these programs should be considered blue bloods?
Miami (FL) - Miami had one of the most dominant stretches in college football history, claiming 5 national titles in an 18 year span between 1983-2001. But although they sit a respectable 18th in winning percentage, they are only 44th in total wins, behind the likes of Rutgers and Ole Miss. That could be explained by them only playing 96 seasons at the FBS level, which is behind only Houston, Florida State, and UCF among the P5+ND. A main area of concern is the fact that Miami only ranked 41st on the Value Rankings list, behind the likes of Cal, Kansas, Colorado, and Utah. Maybe that has more to do with the fact that it is a private school and does not own its own stadium, but the Value Rankings list is part of the reason i put them down here.
Oregon - If you were only taking recent history into account, Oregon would definitely be considered a blue blood. They rank a respectable 21st on the Value Rankings, ahead of both ACC blue bloods and USC (again, that list is pre-USC to the Big 10). But Oregon also has 0 claimed national titles, finishing runners up in 2010 and 2014. They also sit 34th in wins and 42nd in winning percentage among FBS schools. Certainly a modern power, and a blue blood on the West Coast, but nationally I do not know if they would count as a blue blood.
Texas A&M - Texas A&M satisfies almost every factor listed above. 3 claimed national titles, 12th on the Value Rankings, 16th in wins and 24th in win percentage. However, their last claimed national title was in 1939, almost 85 years ago. Should their lack of championship success in the last 84 years nullify them from being a blue blood?
Wisconsin - Wisconsin is 14th on the Value Rankings, but they are on the border of some of the other categories. 24th in wins, 35th in win percentage, and 0 claimed national titles. Probably not a blue blood to me, but if they were to win a national title would there be an argument?