Malik willis get drafted
Detroit Lions depth chart review
2023.03.20 17:24 FunetikPrugresiv Detroit Lions depth chart review
So Brad Holmes has gone into this offseason far more aggressive than I expected, and through free agency has completely revamped several key positions for the upcoming year. With the draft still yet to come, I think it bears evaluating where the team stands right now.
These are my expectations for where who the starters and backups will be, obviously subject to change based on the draft and future free agents (I thought they were done with major free agent changes as of yesterday, but I was very clearly wrong then and reserve the right to fix this later on).
Notes:
Defense
Special Teams
Final notes:
1) The Lions heavily prioritizing the secondary this offseason really gives them more freedom going into the draft. Other than DT, there really is no position where they have to draft a player, which means they can go for the players they like in the long-term without having to plan on relying on rookies to start.
2) The Lions have long-term needs everywhere. Other than special teams, center, and maybe safety, there's no position that they couldn't justify in the first round, which gives them the freedom to go BPA:
4) Heavily addressing CB while leaving QB wide open has made it much more difficult for other teams to guess what they're going to do, giving them an edge in the draft.
5) Finally, signing all of these free agents to 1-year contracts means they are not only leaving themselves future financial flexibility, but they're setting themselves up in the long-run by putting those players in a position to show out and earn big FA contracts, which could give the Lions comp picks next year if they aren't keen on the free agent options available.
submitted by FunetikPrugresiv to detroitlions [link] [comments]
These are my expectations for where who the starters and backups will be, obviously subject to change based on the draft and future free agents (I thought they were done with major free agent changes as of yesterday, but I was very clearly wrong then and reserve the right to fix this later on).
Notes:
- Numbers in parentheses represent the number of years the Lions still have that player signed for (including this year)
- * indicates RFA/ERFA at end of contract
- +1 indicates draft pick Lions have an extra (fifth) year available due to first-round pick contract.
- +v indicates a void year(s) at end of contract
| Position | Expected Starter(s) | Expected reserves [Plus currently signed, but expected Practice Squad/cut] | Analysis |
|---|---|---|---|
| QB (1) | Goff (2) | The Lions are set with Goff starting, but still have to address the backup spot(s). Holmes not addressing this in FA yet really sends a strong signal that they're going to heavily consider a developmental QB in the draft. | |
| RB (5) | Montgomery (3+v) /Swift (1) | Reynolds (1), Jefferson (1), Bell (2)* | It's tough to really say whether Swift or Montgomery will start, because it's likely that they both will alternate with starter's reps. Montgomery is a true three-down back, but I'm hoping that Ben Johnson develops Swift into more of a toolbox scatback type of player to both take advantage of his ability in the open field and mitigate his hesitancy and mediocrity with pass-blocking and running inside. Either way, it's a competent if unspectacular running back duo that could would be an acceptable group but has room for a high-end player (like Bijan). |
| WR (9) | St. Brown (2), Williams (3+1) | Reynolds (1), Raymond (1), Cephus (1), Kennedy (2), [Alexander (2), Benson (1)*, Berryhill (1)] | St. Brown and Williams should be a formidable young WR duo, and Reynolds and Raymond make a very good pair of backups. Williams gives this group one of the higher upsides in the league, but they lack height across the board and could use a taller receiver to round it out. Their starters are here past this year, but their backups are mostly one-year guys, so keep an eye on picks later in the draft for development. |
| TE/H-Back (5) | Cabina (1), Wright (1)* | Zylstra (1)*, Mitchell (3), [Deese (2)] | Probably their weakest overall position group right now, though still functional. Mitchell gives them developmental upside, and these guys were used effectively last year, but there's definitely room for improvement and long-term players. Interestingly, they helped mitigate the Lions' lack of receiver height in the red zone, so it could be that this group is seen as complete because of team scheme and needs. |
| OT (5) | Decker (2+v), Sewell (2+1) | Nelson (1), [Eze (2), Paulo (1)] | Decker and Sewell are one of the better tackle duos in the league, and Nelson gives them a competent backup. Because the Lions use a lot of jumbo packages, expect them to add another swing-tackle unless Eze or Paulo takes a significant step forward. |
| IOL (7) | Jackson (1), Vitai (2), Ragnow (4) | Glasgow (1) [Stenberg (1), Pierschbacher (1)*, Awosika (1)*] | I grouped G and C together because Glasgow will likely backup both positions. The Lions are likely set here at starter, but look for them to add another guard/tackle hybrid to backup, and likely to develop for future seasons given that only Vitai and Ragnow are signed beyond this season. |
| Position | Expected Starter(s) | Backups | Need(s)* |
|---|---|---|---|
| IDL (5) | McNeill (2), Buggs (2) | Onwuzurike (2), Jones (1)*, [Taylor (1)] | This is the Lions' biggest need at starter this year, and it isn't particularly close. Buggs is solid, but more of the kind of guy you want as a rotational backup. At backup, Onwuzurike may never actually play another snap and Jones leaves a lot to be desired. Expect Detroit to hit this early in the draft. |
| Edge/OLB (7) | Hutchinson (3+1), R Okwara (1) | Paschal (3), Cominsky (2), J Okwara (1), Houston (1)*, Harris (1+v) | The Lions are deep here, with all of these guys capable of being at least average level starters. Retaining Romeo is a potentially huge win for this unit - if he's back to where he was two years ago, this could low-key be a top-5 edge group with star power, depth, youthful upside, and versatility. |
| LB (4) | Anzalone (3+v), Rodriguez (3) | Barnes (2), Pittman (1)* | Anzalone and Rodriguez are both limited guys that are capable of being at least average starters. Linebacker is Holmes' least prioritized position on defense and their starters are signed for the long-term, but I expect them to add at least one more for special teams purposes (Josh Woods?) |
| CB (10) | Sutton (3), Moseley (1), Gardner-Johnson (1) | Okudah (1), Jacobs (1)*, Harris (1), [Lucas (3), Dorsey (1), McCain (1)*, Williams (2)] | This expected starting unit has been completely revamped, and gives the Lions a lot of versatility in their pass defense schemes. They lack a true shutdown corner, and five of their top 6 are only signed for this year, so they still have need for both current and future options. |
| S (5) | Walker (2), Joseph (3) | Moore (2), Melifonwu (2) [Breeze (1)] | Harris and CGJ could be considered safeties, as they'll play a bit of a hybrid slot/safety role in AG's defense. Walker and Joseph could potentially be a very good safety duo, and Moore is a very good special-teamer. This group lacks a true strong safety, however, and with AG preferring 3-safety looks, this is still in play. |
| Position | Expected Starter | Analysis |
|---|---|---|
| P | Fox (4) | One of the best in the league, not going anywhere. |
| K | Badgley (1) | A competent kicker, though unexciting. Expect an addition at some point to compete for a kicking job in camp, because that's just how Holmes/Campbell run things. |
| LS | McQuaide (1) | I expect McQuaide to win the job over Daly. Not much else to say here, other than it's unlikely the Lions would prioritize this enough to draft. |
1) The Lions heavily prioritizing the secondary this offseason really gives them more freedom going into the draft. Other than DT, there really is no position where they have to draft a player, which means they can go for the players they like in the long-term without having to plan on relying on rookies to start.
2) The Lions have long-term needs everywhere. Other than special teams, center, and maybe safety, there's no position that they couldn't justify in the first round, which gives them the freedom to go BPA:
- At QB, while Goff is a very good QB, he's athletically limited and expensive relative to a potential R1 QB. Drafting his eventual replacement to sit and learn behind him (and from Ben Johnson) for two years not only gives them a backup QB and a future low-cost QB option to build around, but also a scenario where Goff getting injured isn't a waste because it becomes a development opportunity.
- Taking Bijan in R1 sets them in the long-term and a gives them a hell of a three-headed monster this year.
- Getting an OT like Skoronski allows him to back-up G and T, and potentially replace Decker in several years.
- Getting a G allows them to cut Vitai this year, and/or replace Jackson next year.
- Getting a true three-down threat opposite Hutch would give them one of the best units in the league at one of the most important positions.
- Getting a starting DT would fill their one true starting need.
- Adding Simpson or Sanders could give them someone to develop as a hybrid linebackestrong safety and fill two needs at once.
- This a deep cornerback class and the Lions still don't have an island CB so if they feel like they can find one they could jump in it.
4) Heavily addressing CB while leaving QB wide open has made it much more difficult for other teams to guess what they're going to do, giving them an edge in the draft.
5) Finally, signing all of these free agents to 1-year contracts means they are not only leaving themselves future financial flexibility, but they're setting themselves up in the long-run by putting those players in a position to show out and earn big FA contracts, which could give the Lions comp picks next year if they aren't keen on the free agent options available.
2023.03.20 17:24 LazyImmigrant Do I need to get my windows insulated? With the heavy winds today, I just noticed my vertical blinds shaking. Is this level of draft common/okay?
 | submitted by LazyImmigrant to newfoundland [link] [comments] |
2023.03.20 17:17 Turbulent_Profit_831 Shall I trade my present MVP to get a prospective MVP given that I already have drafted an alien?
submitted by Turbulent_Profit_831 to BasketballGM [link] [comments]
2023.03.20 17:13 OrganicHoneydew still no cutscene with willy
it’s been a couple weeks since i completed the community center, and i still haven’t had the cutscene with willy and his boat. what gives?
ive been to his place and tried the door but it doesn’t work.
i’m on pc, and the only mods i have that actually effect character behavior are horny bachelors and lewd events. no sve no expansions.
sooo….. how do i get to the boat? lmao
submitted by OrganicHoneydew to StardewValley [link] [comments]
ive been to his place and tried the door but it doesn’t work.
i’m on pc, and the only mods i have that actually effect character behavior are horny bachelors and lewd events. no sve no expansions.
sooo….. how do i get to the boat? lmao
2023.03.20 17:12 Jomosensual Returning player, 2k23 MyGM Questions
Hi guys. I'm looking at buying this years game for MyGM specifically as this is the first year myself and my 2 brothers can all play together. Haven't played a GM mode since SVR08. Some questions on the mode for 2k23:
submitted by Jomosensual to WWEGames [link] [comments]
- Last year I tried to play a little GM Mode and never got past the draft. There were just a crap ton of people missing randomly from the board and it was really annoying trying to figure out why I couldn't find some of my favorites. They were always on in the draft pools as well. Is that a problem in this year's game? And if so, can we work around that issue somehow? Or is it that if someone is missing from the draft they're just not useable in that save?
- How do annual events work? Does the Rumble function correctly? Is MITB in it? What does Survivor Series do? Who gets the Elimination Chamber matches?
- How do the PPV/PLEs work? In the SVR games there were branded PPVs. Now there aren't any of these IRL. Does the game just pick some to make branded? Do we all just drop matches on the same show?
- Lastly, one of my favorite things was the random brand vs brand events dropped into co branded PPVs. Are those a thing? If so, what are they? War Games would be super cool and fun to have as one for example.
2023.03.20 17:10 NJden_bee What is your favourite historical fiction book
I know cheap title and post but I was listening to a podcast about historical fiction and the origin of the genre. I found it very interesting and it made me want to dive back into what really has always been my favourite genre. I have recently been of the beaten track reading fantasy but I want to get back into what I truly love.
So give me your personal favourite or what you think I should read next and I will add it to my list. My all time favourite is the Alexander trilogy by Manfreddi, I have found all of his books I have read so far to be incredibily good and easy to read. Other than that recently I have enjoyed the first two books in the Saladin trilogy by Jack Hight(3 is on a list somewhere already) and something that I randomly found in a charity shop called "Iron cross" by Willi Heinrich, incredible book and if you are into WWII books I really recommend it.
submitted by NJden_bee to HistoricalFiction [link] [comments]
So give me your personal favourite or what you think I should read next and I will add it to my list. My all time favourite is the Alexander trilogy by Manfreddi, I have found all of his books I have read so far to be incredibily good and easy to read. Other than that recently I have enjoyed the first two books in the Saladin trilogy by Jack Hight(3 is on a list somewhere already) and something that I randomly found in a charity shop called "Iron cross" by Willi Heinrich, incredible book and if you are into WWII books I really recommend it.
2023.03.20 17:10 brandnewday26 Just signed up for AT&T Fiber - Auto Pay issues
I have been a Comcast/Xfinity customer for 20+ years. Dropped cable about 8 years ago for online streaming. About 4 years ago I had issues with Xfinity internet moving slowly during busy hours (presumably sharing with my neighbors nights/weekends) so I moved to Comcast Business. They assured me I wouldn't get slower connection times and I would have a dedicated technician and customer service.
For most of that time connections were consistent and I had no service issues. This month my auto-pay stopped working. I haven't touched those settings since they were initiated with my new business account. I received an email explaining that my account was past-due and I was subject to disconnection.
I logged into my account where it showed the past-due amount - with the confirmation that the next auto-draft was scheduled for April 3. The card on file was correct and had not expired. So I call customer service - the dedicated business support was gone. Call center hell with an automated phone loop that refused to give me "Customer Service" "Representative" "Agent" or anything of the sort. I had to make 3 phone calls to get to a human. Clearly this was a call center in India with a script response. She claimed I had turned off auto pay in March. I told her I did nothing of the sort. She said she couldn't see anything on her end confirming my halting auto pay, but I must have done it.
No. I didn't. And a quick online search revealed this is a common issue. After getting no where with the rep I manually paid the amount due and tried once more to call a human to see if the glitch was corrected for next month. Same result - this agent had me turn off AutoPay and set it again.
When I requested a refund of the additional $10 fee for the payment not being processed she said (and this was the last straw for me) "yes ok ma'am I can certainly refund that amount your account, ma'am. Please note this is a one-time courtesy on your account..." EXCUSE ME???? I've spent over an hour dealing with your system's error and you're giving me a one-time courtesy refund???
Done.
I researched AT&T Fiber in my area. Faster speeds. No data caps. $100 giftcard for signing up. Cheaper service. People who use them in the neighborhood are happy they switched.
GOOD RIDDANCE COMCAST.
TL;DR: Comcast's Auto Pay fail (required to get a discount) and subsequent no customer service = Signed for AT&T Fiber. It feels great to finally bid adieu!
submitted by brandnewday26 to Comcast [link] [comments]
For most of that time connections were consistent and I had no service issues. This month my auto-pay stopped working. I haven't touched those settings since they were initiated with my new business account. I received an email explaining that my account was past-due and I was subject to disconnection.
I logged into my account where it showed the past-due amount - with the confirmation that the next auto-draft was scheduled for April 3. The card on file was correct and had not expired. So I call customer service - the dedicated business support was gone. Call center hell with an automated phone loop that refused to give me "Customer Service" "Representative" "Agent" or anything of the sort. I had to make 3 phone calls to get to a human. Clearly this was a call center in India with a script response. She claimed I had turned off auto pay in March. I told her I did nothing of the sort. She said she couldn't see anything on her end confirming my halting auto pay, but I must have done it.
No. I didn't. And a quick online search revealed this is a common issue. After getting no where with the rep I manually paid the amount due and tried once more to call a human to see if the glitch was corrected for next month. Same result - this agent had me turn off AutoPay and set it again.
When I requested a refund of the additional $10 fee for the payment not being processed she said (and this was the last straw for me) "yes ok ma'am I can certainly refund that amount your account, ma'am. Please note this is a one-time courtesy on your account..." EXCUSE ME???? I've spent over an hour dealing with your system's error and you're giving me a one-time courtesy refund???
Done.
I researched AT&T Fiber in my area. Faster speeds. No data caps. $100 giftcard for signing up. Cheaper service. People who use them in the neighborhood are happy they switched.
GOOD RIDDANCE COMCAST.
TL;DR: Comcast's Auto Pay fail (required to get a discount) and subsequent no customer service = Signed for AT&T Fiber. It feels great to finally bid adieu!
2023.03.20 17:00 zeekbeek69 Weekly Sportsbooks Sign-up Offers
Remember signup offers can change for each state, make sure you check the links below to find out what your state's exclusive offer is!
submitted by zeekbeek69 to EVbetting [link] [comments]
| Sportsbook | Offer | Promo Code/Link | Available States |
|---|---|---|---|
| Caesars | Risk-Free Bet up to $1,250 | PROMOGUYFULL | AZ, CO, IA, IL, IN, LA, MD, MI, NJ, NY, TN, VA |
| BetRivers | $500 Second Chance Bet | PROMOGUY | AZ, CO, IA, IL, IN, LA, MI, NJ, NY, PA, VA |
| Bet MGM | Risk-Free Bet $1,000 | PROMOGUY21 | AZ, CO, IA, IL, IN, LA, MD, MI, NJ, NY, PA, TN, VA |
| DraftKings | Bonus up to $1,000 | link | AZ, CO, IA, IL, IN, LA, MD, MI, NJ, NY, PA, TN, VA |
| Fanduel | Risk-Free Bet $1,000 | link | AZ, CO, IA, IL, IN, LA, MD, MI, NJ, NY, PA, TN, VA |
| SI Sportsbook | Bet $20, Get $100 Free Bets | link | CO, MI, VA |
| PointsBet | Risk-Free Bet $2,000 | link | CO, IL, IN, IA, LA, MI, NJ, PA, VA |
| BetFred | Bet $50, Get $250 Free Bets | link | AZ, CO, IA |
| Tipico | Matched Deposit up to $750 | link | CO, NJ |
| Unibet | Risk-Free Bet $500 | link | AZ, IN, IA, NJ, PA, VA |
| Bet365 | Bet $1, Get $200 Free Bets | link | CO, NJ |
| Betway | Risk-Free Bet $250 | link | NJ, PA |
| WynnBet | Bet $100, Get $100 Free Bets | link | AZ, CO, IN, LA, MI, NJ, NY, TN, VA |
2023.03.20 17:00 kerryfinchelhillary Player of the Day (3/20/23): Chris Bassitt
BASICS:
Born: February 22, 1989
Jersey Number: 61 (White Sox), 40 (Athletics, Mets, Blue Jays)
Bats: Right
Throws: Right
Position: Starting Pitcher
Drafted: 2011 by the White Sox, Round 16, Pick 501
MLB Debut: August 30, 2014
Teams: White Sox (2011-2014), Athletics (2015-2021), Mets (2022), Blue Jays (2023-present)
Twitter: @C_Bass419
Instagram: @cbass419
2022 STATS:
Games: 30
Innings Pitched: 181.2
Wins: 15
Losses: 9
ERA: 3.42
Strikeouts: 167
CAREER STATS:
Games: 136
Innings Pitched: 737.1
Wins: 46
Losses: 34
ERA: 3.45
Strikeouts: 671
Complete Games: 1
Shutouts: 1
CAREER AWARDS:
All Star - 2021
AL Pitcher of the Month - September 2020
Athletics Jim Catfish Hunter Award - 2021
THINGS YOU MIGHT NOT KNOW:
His dog was at his wedding.
He played baseball at University of Akron.
He has two kids.
He likes fishing.
He is an Ohio State Buckeyes fan.
He also played basketball in high school.
2022 HIGHLIGHTS:
He had an 11 K game
He threw seven scoreless innings
He pitched eight innings in one game
He had a strong Mets debut
CAREER HIGHLIGHTS:
He threw a shutout in 2021
He got nine straight wins in 2021
WHY I LIKE HIM:
He's a good pitcher and I love seeing guys from Ohio doing well!
PREVIOUSLY FEATURED PLAYERS:
11/14: Mike Trout 11/15: Jose Ramirez 11/16: Julio Rodriguez 11/17: Michael Harris II 11/18: Sandy Alcantara 11/19: Framber Valdez 11/20: Justin Verlander 11/21: Shane Bieber 11/22: Clayton Kershaw 11/23: Paul Goldschmidt 11/24-11/25: Break 11/26: Aaron Judge 11/27: Spencer Strider 11/28: Oscar Gonzalez 11/29: Lars Nootbaar 11/30: Brendan Rodgers 12/1: Daulton Varsho 12/2: Brandon Belt 12/3: Trent Grisham 12/4: Corey Seager 12/5: Myles Straw 12/6: Sean Murphy 12/7: Christian Yelich 12/8: Nico Hoerner 12/9: Joey Votto 12/10: Bryan Reynolds 12/11: Dylan Cease 12/12: Andres Gimenez 12/13: Luis Arraez 12/14: Bobby Witt Jr 12/15: Miguel Cabrera 12/16: Francisco Lindor 12/17: JT Realmuto 12/18: Victor Robles 12/19: Steven Kwan 12/20: Shane McClanahan 12/21: Alek Manoah 12/22: Adley Rutschman 12/23: Kiké Hernandez 12/24-12/26: Break 12/27: Mookie Betts 12/28: Jake Cronenworth 12/29: Brandon Crawford 12/30: Zac Gallen 12/31-1/1: Break 1/2: Cal Quantrill 1/3: Ryan McMahon 1/4: Cal Raleigh 1/5: Patrick Sandoval 1/6: Nathaniel Lowe 1/7: Cole Irvin 1/8: Corbin Burnes 1/9: Liam Hendriks 1/10: Josh Naylor 1/11: Ian Happ 1/12: Nick Lodolo 1/13: Oneil Cruz 1/14: Byron Buxton 1/15: Riley Greene 1/16: Triston McKenzie 1/17: Brady Singer 1/18: Carlos Carrasco 1/19: Aaron Nola 1/20: Jazz Chisholm 1/21: Keibert Ruiz 1/22: Anthony Rizzo 1/23: Amed Rosario 1/24: Tyler Glasnow 1/25: Matt Chapman 1/26: Cedric Mullins 1/27: Rafael Devers 1/28: Matt Olson 1/29: Rich Hill 1/30: Josh Bell 1/31: Jesse Chavez 2/1: Ty France 2/2: Alejandro Kirk 2/3: Jeff McNeil 2/4: Marcus Semien 2/5: Luke Jackson 2/6: Mike Zunino 2/7: Christian Walker 2/8: Walker Buehler 2/9: Jose Trevino 2/10: Nolan Arenado 2/11: Mitch Haniger 2/12: Yu Darvish 2/13: Logan Webb 2/14: Daniel Bard 2/15: Trey Mancini 2/16: Taylor Ward 2/17: Seth Brown 2/18: Willy Adames 2/19: Seiya Suzuki 2/20: Hunter Greene 2/21: Michael Kopech 2/22: Andrew McCutchen 2/23: Jhoan Duran 2/24: Eric Haase 2/25: Salvador Perez 2/26: Vladimir Guerrero Jr 2/27: Yandy Diaz 2/28: Ramon Urias 3/1: Trevor Story 3/2: Zack Wheeler 3/3: Jon Berti 3/4: Lane Thomas 3/5: Willson Contreras 3/6: Jose Abreu 3/7: Spencer Torkelson 3/8: Xander Bogaerts 3/9: Pablo Lopez 3/10: Cody Bellinger 3/11: Jacob deGrom 3/12: Adam Frazier 3/13: Max Muncy 3/14: Andrew Benintendi 3/15: Tyler Anderson 3/16: Christian Vazquez 3/17: Max Scherzer 3/18: Jesus Aguilar 3/19: Rhys Hoskins
submitted by kerryfinchelhillary to baseball [link] [comments]
Born: February 22, 1989
Jersey Number: 61 (White Sox), 40 (Athletics, Mets, Blue Jays)
Bats: Right
Throws: Right
Position: Starting Pitcher
Drafted: 2011 by the White Sox, Round 16, Pick 501
MLB Debut: August 30, 2014
Teams: White Sox (2011-2014), Athletics (2015-2021), Mets (2022), Blue Jays (2023-present)
Twitter: @C_Bass419
Instagram: @cbass419
2022 STATS:
Games: 30
Innings Pitched: 181.2
Wins: 15
Losses: 9
ERA: 3.42
Strikeouts: 167
CAREER STATS:
Games: 136
Innings Pitched: 737.1
Wins: 46
Losses: 34
ERA: 3.45
Strikeouts: 671
Complete Games: 1
Shutouts: 1
CAREER AWARDS:
All Star - 2021
AL Pitcher of the Month - September 2020
Athletics Jim Catfish Hunter Award - 2021
THINGS YOU MIGHT NOT KNOW:
His dog was at his wedding.
He played baseball at University of Akron.
He has two kids.
He likes fishing.
He is an Ohio State Buckeyes fan.
He also played basketball in high school.
2022 HIGHLIGHTS:
He had an 11 K game
He threw seven scoreless innings
He pitched eight innings in one game
He had a strong Mets debut
CAREER HIGHLIGHTS:
He threw a shutout in 2021
He got nine straight wins in 2021
WHY I LIKE HIM:
He's a good pitcher and I love seeing guys from Ohio doing well!
PREVIOUSLY FEATURED PLAYERS:
11/14: Mike Trout 11/15: Jose Ramirez 11/16: Julio Rodriguez 11/17: Michael Harris II 11/18: Sandy Alcantara 11/19: Framber Valdez 11/20: Justin Verlander 11/21: Shane Bieber 11/22: Clayton Kershaw 11/23: Paul Goldschmidt 11/24-11/25: Break 11/26: Aaron Judge 11/27: Spencer Strider 11/28: Oscar Gonzalez 11/29: Lars Nootbaar 11/30: Brendan Rodgers 12/1: Daulton Varsho 12/2: Brandon Belt 12/3: Trent Grisham 12/4: Corey Seager 12/5: Myles Straw 12/6: Sean Murphy 12/7: Christian Yelich 12/8: Nico Hoerner 12/9: Joey Votto 12/10: Bryan Reynolds 12/11: Dylan Cease 12/12: Andres Gimenez 12/13: Luis Arraez 12/14: Bobby Witt Jr 12/15: Miguel Cabrera 12/16: Francisco Lindor 12/17: JT Realmuto 12/18: Victor Robles 12/19: Steven Kwan 12/20: Shane McClanahan 12/21: Alek Manoah 12/22: Adley Rutschman 12/23: Kiké Hernandez 12/24-12/26: Break 12/27: Mookie Betts 12/28: Jake Cronenworth 12/29: Brandon Crawford 12/30: Zac Gallen 12/31-1/1: Break 1/2: Cal Quantrill 1/3: Ryan McMahon 1/4: Cal Raleigh 1/5: Patrick Sandoval 1/6: Nathaniel Lowe 1/7: Cole Irvin 1/8: Corbin Burnes 1/9: Liam Hendriks 1/10: Josh Naylor 1/11: Ian Happ 1/12: Nick Lodolo 1/13: Oneil Cruz 1/14: Byron Buxton 1/15: Riley Greene 1/16: Triston McKenzie 1/17: Brady Singer 1/18: Carlos Carrasco 1/19: Aaron Nola 1/20: Jazz Chisholm 1/21: Keibert Ruiz 1/22: Anthony Rizzo 1/23: Amed Rosario 1/24: Tyler Glasnow 1/25: Matt Chapman 1/26: Cedric Mullins 1/27: Rafael Devers 1/28: Matt Olson 1/29: Rich Hill 1/30: Josh Bell 1/31: Jesse Chavez 2/1: Ty France 2/2: Alejandro Kirk 2/3: Jeff McNeil 2/4: Marcus Semien 2/5: Luke Jackson 2/6: Mike Zunino 2/7: Christian Walker 2/8: Walker Buehler 2/9: Jose Trevino 2/10: Nolan Arenado 2/11: Mitch Haniger 2/12: Yu Darvish 2/13: Logan Webb 2/14: Daniel Bard 2/15: Trey Mancini 2/16: Taylor Ward 2/17: Seth Brown 2/18: Willy Adames 2/19: Seiya Suzuki 2/20: Hunter Greene 2/21: Michael Kopech 2/22: Andrew McCutchen 2/23: Jhoan Duran 2/24: Eric Haase 2/25: Salvador Perez 2/26: Vladimir Guerrero Jr 2/27: Yandy Diaz 2/28: Ramon Urias 3/1: Trevor Story 3/2: Zack Wheeler 3/3: Jon Berti 3/4: Lane Thomas 3/5: Willson Contreras 3/6: Jose Abreu 3/7: Spencer Torkelson 3/8: Xander Bogaerts 3/9: Pablo Lopez 3/10: Cody Bellinger 3/11: Jacob deGrom 3/12: Adam Frazier 3/13: Max Muncy 3/14: Andrew Benintendi 3/15: Tyler Anderson 3/16: Christian Vazquez 3/17: Max Scherzer 3/18: Jesus Aguilar 3/19: Rhys Hoskins
2023.03.20 16:59 AndyVakser Trigger Warning. Plan A/B/C.
I love to obsess over the draft and offseason every year, and I’ve been trying to wrap my head around this one for a while. We rarely do what I want or think we should or will do. Before last year, besides obvious choices in Peyton Manning, Edgerrin James, & Andrew Luck, the only times we’ve matched up were with Ryan Kelly and Malik Hooker. In 2021, I was also high on Dayo Odeyingbo, but last year, freaking golden. We got one of my favourite prospects in Alec Pierce and also snagged pieces I was very high on in Jelani Woods and Bernhard Raimann. We even snagged two of my favourite UDFAs in JoJo Domann and Dallis Flowers. I strongly suspect that last year, we had Desmond Ridder targeted with our next pick, but I think we were somewhat fortunate to get a bargain LT in Raimann instead. And Stephon Gilmore as icing on the cake. (Now of course it sucks that we ended up sucking, but there were a number of specific fiascos that really contributed to that).
I think it helped that I was confident we’d be picking at our assigned spots and had a good grasp on how the board would fall. But mostly, over the years, I’ve drank the Kool-Aid and seen how Ballard operates. Ballard is very transparent in telegraphing his philosophy, and I do think that he’s a very good GM (although I think it was almost unforgivable to not bring in a starting LT last offseason). This year is a different beast though - the variability of how the board falls is very difficult to gauge, and a lot of different options and difficult decisions will be presented at our current spots (and it is extremely possible that we do not draft at those spots depending on how the board falls). 2018 provides the only historical data for drafting in this range. We traded the number 3 pick for a haul of picks 6, 37, 49, & a 2019 2nd rounder. I don’t discount that we could see an eerily similar outcome this year.
It’s early, and generally, the closer we get to the draft, the easier it is to prognosticate on how the board will fall. But I think I have an idea of likely scenarios. This isn’t necessarily exactly what I want us to do or exactly what I think Ballard will do - it’s kinda a blend, but heavily influenced by Ballard’s philosophies. What are those? Ballard may bend, but he will not break. He is disciplined and will stick to his guns. Ballard will not pass on a blue chip edge. Quarterback is a position that must be addressed (external pressure is at a fever pitch, and alternative options are beyond scarce). Elite traits. Ballard will trade down for value. Ballard will trade up for a target.
Plan A: Will Anderson, Jr. at 4; Trade up from 35 to 30ish for Hendon Hooker; clear cap space via trades/cuts, and offer Lamar Jackson an obnoxious contract.
Plan B: Anthony Richardson if available (or C.J. Stroud if AR not available); Hendon Hooker at 35 (or BPA or trade down if not available).
Plan C: Trade down for a haul from somebody who wants Bryce Young; Trade up from 35 to 30ish for Hendon Hooker; BPAs with rest of haul; clear cap space via trades/cuts, and offer Lamar Jackson an obnoxious contract.
I’m sure a lot of people will hate at least one (or all) of these scenarios. I think the answers to any questions about why I think any of the above should be self-evident, but feel free to inquire if not.
submitted by AndyVakser to Colts [link] [comments]
I think it helped that I was confident we’d be picking at our assigned spots and had a good grasp on how the board would fall. But mostly, over the years, I’ve drank the Kool-Aid and seen how Ballard operates. Ballard is very transparent in telegraphing his philosophy, and I do think that he’s a very good GM (although I think it was almost unforgivable to not bring in a starting LT last offseason). This year is a different beast though - the variability of how the board falls is very difficult to gauge, and a lot of different options and difficult decisions will be presented at our current spots (and it is extremely possible that we do not draft at those spots depending on how the board falls). 2018 provides the only historical data for drafting in this range. We traded the number 3 pick for a haul of picks 6, 37, 49, & a 2019 2nd rounder. I don’t discount that we could see an eerily similar outcome this year.
It’s early, and generally, the closer we get to the draft, the easier it is to prognosticate on how the board will fall. But I think I have an idea of likely scenarios. This isn’t necessarily exactly what I want us to do or exactly what I think Ballard will do - it’s kinda a blend, but heavily influenced by Ballard’s philosophies. What are those? Ballard may bend, but he will not break. He is disciplined and will stick to his guns. Ballard will not pass on a blue chip edge. Quarterback is a position that must be addressed (external pressure is at a fever pitch, and alternative options are beyond scarce). Elite traits. Ballard will trade down for value. Ballard will trade up for a target.
Plan A: Will Anderson, Jr. at 4; Trade up from 35 to 30ish for Hendon Hooker; clear cap space via trades/cuts, and offer Lamar Jackson an obnoxious contract.
Plan B: Anthony Richardson if available (or C.J. Stroud if AR not available); Hendon Hooker at 35 (or BPA or trade down if not available).
Plan C: Trade down for a haul from somebody who wants Bryce Young; Trade up from 35 to 30ish for Hendon Hooker; BPAs with rest of haul; clear cap space via trades/cuts, and offer Lamar Jackson an obnoxious contract.
I’m sure a lot of people will hate at least one (or all) of these scenarios. I think the answers to any questions about why I think any of the above should be self-evident, but feel free to inquire if not.
2023.03.20 16:58 Stuck1nARutt Looking for new Fantasy Owners for /r/Leafs Fantasy Keeper League for 2023/2024 season
Hello all.
We are going through playoffs of our first year of the new 16-team /Leafs Keeper League. We are looking for some new owners going into next year. Here's what you need to know.
1) League is a paid league. Entry is USD $25 yearly and increases may be discussed during offseasons
2) Platform used is Fantrax. Fantrax is available mobile and desktop, is not as user friendly as other platforms (takes some getting used to) but is far-and-away considered the best for custom leagues due to the sheer customization we can implement.
3) League is a 16-team Keeper league. Meaning you keep 4 of your players year after year and redraft for the rest.
4) A high level of engagement is required. Our main form of inter-season communication (trades, banter, leafs chat etc.) is Discord. By engagement, we mean:
It's a fun and social group, but this is a competitive league and our biggest challenge this year was having 5-6 teams that have either a) gone inactive or b) "locked down" their team and refused to participate.
So at the end of the day, if you're a social/outgoing person, even if you're new to Fantasy, you will be most welcomed and we are all very helpful, especially as many of us are leaning the ins and outs of Fantrax for the first time.
If you are interested, please post here and I will send a PM to discuss further. There are a handful of teams that require new owners, and as you will be taking over an existing team, you will be able to participate almost right away as our draft lottery, keeper selections and offseason trades will be happening very soon.
Thanks for reading
submitted by Stuck1nARutt to leafs [link] [comments]
We are going through playoffs of our first year of the new 16-team /Leafs Keeper League. We are looking for some new owners going into next year. Here's what you need to know.
1) League is a paid league. Entry is USD $25 yearly and increases may be discussed during offseasons
2) Platform used is Fantrax. Fantrax is available mobile and desktop, is not as user friendly as other platforms (takes some getting used to) but is far-and-away considered the best for custom leagues due to the sheer customization we can implement.
3) League is a 16-team Keeper league. Meaning you keep 4 of your players year after year and redraft for the rest.
4) A high level of engagement is required. Our main form of inter-season communication (trades, banter, leafs chat etc.) is Discord. By engagement, we mean:
- actively setting lineups on a (minimum) weekly basis
- participating in discord chats (varying levels of activity but some minimum is required)
- being available for trades (you are not required to make trades, but you must be available to reach and talk to about them.)
It's a fun and social group, but this is a competitive league and our biggest challenge this year was having 5-6 teams that have either a) gone inactive or b) "locked down" their team and refused to participate.
So at the end of the day, if you're a social/outgoing person, even if you're new to Fantasy, you will be most welcomed and we are all very helpful, especially as many of us are leaning the ins and outs of Fantrax for the first time.
If you are interested, please post here and I will send a PM to discuss further. There are a handful of teams that require new owners, and as you will be taking over an existing team, you will be able to participate almost right away as our draft lottery, keeper selections and offseason trades will be happening very soon.
Thanks for reading
2023.03.20 16:51 wollester Timing for asking for scholarship reconsideration?
I believe I might be a good candidate for getting a scholarship at a t14 which previously did not offer me one. I am basing this off the schools own words, and the fact that a peer t14 has offered me half tuition. I already have a letter drafted and know exactly how to send it, I am only questioning when to send it. My intuition says to send it after the deposit deadline, but that would require putting a $500 deposit at both schools, and to put it plainly I am broke and need to save money before school, so that would not be optimal.
Any tips??
submitted by wollester to lawschooladmissions [link] [comments]
Any tips??
2023.03.20 16:44 Murraculous1 Galactic Renaissance Preview: Should You Back this Spiritual Cousin to Inis? — Bitewing Games
 | submitted by Murraculous1 to boardgames [link] [comments] https://preview.redd.it/kz4up4z8zwoa1.png?width=1024&format=png&auto=webp&s=6fd37e8b53169fc64034fbd3d6442542d51159ff Note: This blog post also exists in podcast form, if you prefer to listen. A preview copy was provided by the publisher. I have 4 Total Plays at 2, 3, and 4 Players. This is a prototype, meaning the rules and components are not final. For example, the score track has changed since this prototype was printed and the basic wood pieces will be replaced by lavish minis. Recently, I shared my 1st impressions of Galactic Renaissance where I mostly compared it to Inis, the other design in this Political Trilogy from designer Christian Martinez and publisher Matagot. In this preview, I intend to spend less time comparing to the two games and more time focusing on Galactic Renaissance itself. Let’s see where this takes us… Long ago, the galactic empire fell into ruin. Peoples and their planets lost contact with each other, and the galaxy entered a period not unlike the dark ages. Intergalactic progress and cooperation was stymied and, for better or worse, aliens were no longer able to meddle in each other’s business. But from the ashes of a space dynasty eventually arises a renaissance. Portals are rediscovered. Secrets and knowledge are uncovered. Political relationships are reforged. And a new Galactic Senate is born — not one of compulsory conquest, but of peaceful and voluntary coalition. Each player represents a unique planet and controls aspirational emissaries. These emissaries are sent throughout the galaxy to gain allies, establish institutes, discover foundations, and reawaken specialists — the ancient ones from the now dead empire who remain frozen in stasis to preserve wisdom and knowledge. While the shared vision is to peacefully rebuild an interstellar civilization, each player wants to come out as top dog in the Senate, and sometimes you need to step on some alien toes to get there. Players are racing to 30 points by striving to fulfill the Senate Policies (scoring objective cards), which notably expand and change a bit during the game. The deck of these cards is fairly large (16 total) and you only ever play with a combination of 5, so you’ll encounter a fair amount of variety here from one play to the next. It’s not too unpredictable, though, as these cards generally encourage you to spread out across more planets with your emissaries and institutes. Sometimes your mere presence on a planet will suffice, other times the scoring requirements get more specific (e.g. have majority or minority on a planet, build an institute on a planet, be on planets with specific features like foundations or portals, etc.). https://preview.redd.it/0bue7l8izwoa1.jpg?width=1280&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=f8c42a334100ee36962c9685f5294bf427dcd8b0 The manner in which you score points and win the game is refreshingly unique on multiple facets:
Your turns start out quite simple:
That said, early decisions can have a huge impact on your strategy. The game actually starts with an interesting draft where you lay out a bunch of unique home worlds, powerful specialist cards, and starting emissary quantities. Players take turns claiming an option until they possess one of each category. If my two opponents lunge for home worlds before me (thanks to some tempting planet abilities), I can now ignore that category until the end because the remaining two options are exclusively for me to choose from. If I can manage to select a specialist card that combos well with one of those planets (or strengthens my ability to milk a score card on display), then that’ll be my first choice. This starting phase certainly favors more experienced players who understand the hidden nuances, but it absolutely doesn’t determine the winner. Play begins with your most basic single-action turns: recruit more emissaries from your supply, explore a new planet, spread your emissaries around, claim planet ability tokens by having majority pieces there, build an institute, gain another specialist card into your deck… those kinds of things. Emissaries and institutes give you vital presence throughout the galaxy, which is what you’ll need to earn points from the objective cards. While emissaries are mobile and flexible, institutes are stationary buildings which increase your hand size and allow you to recruit directly to more planets than your home world. Gaining allies (claiming planet ability tiles) will open up your options (assuming you have a card to play that lets you activate a planet ability). And awakening specialists is like injecting alien steroids into your deck. To be honest, all of these actions feel satisfyingly powerful — that of gaining specialists, increasing your hand size, and growing your planet tableau. https://preview.redd.it/8leuh0tlzwoa1.jpg?width=1280&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=00a64cc9d7e56dde5d74d067f2caacd42e2dcd98 Those who enjoy a meaty engine builder or snowballing combotastic turns will find much to love here. Where early turns often see players throwing down one card for a single action and an occasional handful of pitiful points, late turns will see them executing a half dozen actions across multiple cards and planet tiles as they rocket up the score track. That’s because some actions, if chosen, will grant you the ability to take another action (I.e. play another card). These are mainly found across the specialist cards and planet tokens, which players gain more of over time. You’ll get a taste of the vastness of outer space as growing planet tiles consume your table and single turn combos stretch on into eternity. Inevitably, downtime noticeably increases as the game nears its completion or when more players are at the table. Where two experienced players can certainly knock a game out in roughly 90 minutes, at three and four players it seems more likely that you’ll cross two hours and even approach three. Where many games can buckle under the weight of slow downtimes or long play sessions, Galactic Renaissance handles it fairly well. I believe I prefer it most at 3 players, which strikes a nice balance between player competition and game length, but I certainly enjoyed it at 2 and 4 as well. Those who want to bask in maximum conflict will surely find it in the epic 4 player game. https://preview.redd.it/stytjnmmzwoa1.jpg?width=1280&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=6a54f864904d3cacc955d76fa7f3a1f5f57d250b Conflict itself is another standout feature of the Galactic Renaissance experience. Each planet displays a stability threshold represented by a number of spaces. These spaces do not limit how many emissaries, institutes, and foundations are allowed on a planet; rather, they simply indicate the planet’s tolerance for interstellar interlopers. If you ever end your turn with a planet’s stability threshold exceeded, then a disorder phase is triggered. Starting with the active player, every player must take a disorder action (even if the planet becomes stable again during the disorder phase). That means that somebody (usually multiple somebodies) is getting kicked off the planet, unless you happen to have a disorder card in your hand to play and avoid your mandatory evacuation. Usually, you’ll either have to remove an emissary, remove an institute, or retreat to an allied planet. If a player only has one piece on a planet, you can do a lot of damage by getting them kicked off (often costing them the chance to score 1-3 points from that planet). What’s even crazier is that you can retreat to an allied planet with too many emissaries and cause that planet to become unstable. It’s possible to trigger a cascade of disorder if you are so inclined for such chaos. Notably, disorder is not only more common with more players, but it is also more worthwhile. Where many of the scoring objective cards require you to be on a shared planet (meaning more than one player has pieces on it), it often feels like a waste to crowd out an opponent if their departure means the planet is no longer shared. The only reason to do something like that is if this rival could potentially win the game on their next turn and you are forced to sacrifice your own scoring potential to keep your hope of a comeback alive. In a 3 or 4 player game, you are more frequently incentivized to sow chaos across the galaxy because planets often possess 3 or more player colors, and nobody cares if that 3rd or 4th player gets booted (except for them, of course ;). Even after spending many hours with the game across several plays, I’m still finding myself learning and improving. There are plenty of strategies and tactics to dig up in this galactic sandbox. You’ll discover and gleefully spam tricks that allow you to cycle through your deck faster to get back to that Senator card ASAP. You’ll meddle in the business of others and spread disorder across planets where opponents are weakly clinging on in desperation. You’ll seek to undermine their scoring potential while carefully planting seeds for your next scoring harvest. It’s not as blatant or brutal as Inis, but the interaction here can still be very effective. https://preview.redd.it/lb2aoqknzwoa1.jpg?width=1280&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1ddf253d7e30bc0e1cceab43ea7d4670d7a761bf While Galactic Renaissance preserves much of the political and positional spirit of Inis, it manages to carve out its own legacy. If Inis is a knife fight in a Celtic phone booth between prospective kings atop a hill, Galactic Renaissance is a space race between growing snowballs as they roll down that hill. Both games serve as loud and clear evidence that Christian Martinez is a designer to keep an eye on and that Matagot knows how to make an epic board game. I, for one, am excited to see and experience this game further, especially in its final form. Galactic Renaissance launches on Kickstarter on March 21st. Check it out here. Article written by Nick of Bitewing Games. Outside of practicing dentistry part-time, Nick has devoted his remaining work-time to collaborating with the world’s best designers, illustrators, and creators in producing excellent board games, including the upcoming Zoo Vadis by Reiner Knizia. He hopes you’ll follow Bitewing Games in their quest to create and share classy board games that bite. |
2023.03.20 16:44 brasscassette Animators, what stands out as a good commission when you see one?
I have a (extraordinarily small) project coming up where I am considering hiring an animator for a portion of it.
I work as an audio engineer, and I’ve seen hundreds of commissions where the client clearly doesn’t know what they want, doesn’t understand what they’re asking for, has incomplete material to work from, and is offering just enough money for me to download their audio and send it back untouched /s.
So in order to submit the best commission requests, what do you want to see on a listing or from a client email?
Things I’ve thought of so far:
*Concept docs/art to get on the same page
*Details as to where the work is going to be displayed: youtube, TikTok, company website, on-screen ad in a taxi etc etc
*Expected timeline
*budget
*revisions budget and terms
*aspect ratio requirements
*a draft version of audio to work from
*deliverable formats required
What else do you want to see in a commission? What makes a commission look like one that is worth accepting?
Thanks all!
submitted by brasscassette to Animators [link] [comments]
I work as an audio engineer, and I’ve seen hundreds of commissions where the client clearly doesn’t know what they want, doesn’t understand what they’re asking for, has incomplete material to work from, and is offering just enough money for me to download their audio and send it back untouched /s.
So in order to submit the best commission requests, what do you want to see on a listing or from a client email?
Things I’ve thought of so far:
*Concept docs/art to get on the same page
*Details as to where the work is going to be displayed: youtube, TikTok, company website, on-screen ad in a taxi etc etc
*Expected timeline
*budget
*revisions budget and terms
*aspect ratio requirements
*a draft version of audio to work from
*deliverable formats required
What else do you want to see in a commission? What makes a commission look like one that is worth accepting?
Thanks all!
2023.03.20 16:39 ThePoeticBean New to league and Zeri what should I know?
I want to really one trick her, but I can’t seem to figure it out, I’m not even able to play ranked yet but in draft I keep getting heated badly and my winrate is down to 33% as adc. I play super passively and defensively early cuz her early game is weak but I can’t seem to catch up in most matches or get many KOs. How do I play her early or safely? What should I do when I’m behind on gold and levels? How should I play if I’m getting out-ranged? And when do I know to go in for a KO?
submitted by ThePoeticBean to ZeriMains [link] [comments]
2023.03.20 16:39 dotbarnfather Domantas Sabonis is Quietly Separating Himself from the Rest of the Pack When It Comes to the Conversation Around 3rd Best Center in the NBA
On March 15th, Domantas Sabonis recorded his second triple-double in as many games against the Chicago Bulls. His 14 points, 10 assists, 17 rebounds somewhat went underdiscussed after some guy named De'Aaron Fox hit a game-winner following DeMar DeRozan’s four point play to tie the game. But also underdiscussed: that triple-double put him at 11 on the season, now second most in the NBA behind Nikola Jokic’s incredible 28.
Sabonis has quietly had a career defining season. His 19.2 points per game (ninth among centers) is his best since 2020-21. He’s averaging career highs in rebounds (12.5, best in the NBA) and assists (7.2, second best among centers in the NBA). His splits have been amazing– 61.2% from the field (career high) and 35.5% from deep (arguably the best of his career if we don’t count 52.9% in 2018-19 on 0.2 attempts per game).
But it is tough to talk about a player like Sabonis – not because he isn’t great, but because of the two centers ahead of him in Jokic and Embiid. And Jokic is arguably a better version of what he offers. Then again, he wasn’t selected last when it came to the NBA All-Star Game. He was second to last among the reserves. Things might be changing.
The Sacramento Kings will never be his team while alongside De’Aaron Fox yet in many ways, his influence this season could create the argument that he has been the most important when it comes to this Kings glow-up. And before anyone gets way too deep into the weeds, Fox is clearly the best player, I’m just gassing up Sabonis.
Sabonis is very much an underrated passer. Per game, he’s recording five or more passes to six different Kings players. He, Jokic and Vucevic are the only three centers in the NBA to average more than 50 passes made per game. And his assists pointed created (19.2) averages out to 2.667 points per assist – speaking to just how good he has been about finding the open man to generate a good three-point look. For reference, Jokic is looking at 2.49 points per assist, Karl-Anthony Towns is averaging 2.34, Julius Randle is at 2.68 and Embiid is at 2.54. It does help that Sabonis has players like Kevin Huerter, Keegan Murray, Malik Monk and Harrison Barnes being absolute friends behind the arch. But they still need the ball in their hands to shoot. It has also been nice to see his flexibility in the post – passing 49.2% in post-up situations.
And what has also been refreshing is that he isn’t reliant on the pick-and-roll – averaging only 2.5 possessions per game. Instead, it has been his plays cutting to the basket, give-and-go situations – scoring 68% of the time and getting to the line 20.9% of the time on 3.8 possessions per game.
While everyone knows where his scoring is coming from—78% of his shots coming less than 8 ft from the basket—he’s shown a flexibility of he to get there. Overall, he has quietly been assisted less than his two counter parts – 60.5% of his makes being assisted compared to Embiid and Jokic’s 63.4%. And less than 8 ft from the basket, he’s assisted 55.4% of the time compared to Jokic’s 59.7% and Embiid’s 64%.
This isn’t trying to break the wheel, change the world or the narrative that it isn’t a two-man race for best center in the NBA right now. But Sabonis is quietly making a good case to create some separation from the rest of the NBA when it comes to the argument around best centers. Still not a defensive juggernaut, his contribution on the offensive end has been incredibly important to one of the best stories in the NBA -- if not the best. And while he continues to receive recognition (3x All Star, 4 All-NBA votes in 2020-21), it might be time to start taking his campaign a little bit more serious.
submitted by dotbarnfather to nbadiscussion [link] [comments]
Sabonis has quietly had a career defining season. His 19.2 points per game (ninth among centers) is his best since 2020-21. He’s averaging career highs in rebounds (12.5, best in the NBA) and assists (7.2, second best among centers in the NBA). His splits have been amazing– 61.2% from the field (career high) and 35.5% from deep (arguably the best of his career if we don’t count 52.9% in 2018-19 on 0.2 attempts per game).
But it is tough to talk about a player like Sabonis – not because he isn’t great, but because of the two centers ahead of him in Jokic and Embiid. And Jokic is arguably a better version of what he offers. Then again, he wasn’t selected last when it came to the NBA All-Star Game. He was second to last among the reserves. Things might be changing.
The Sacramento Kings will never be his team while alongside De’Aaron Fox yet in many ways, his influence this season could create the argument that he has been the most important when it comes to this Kings glow-up. And before anyone gets way too deep into the weeds, Fox is clearly the best player, I’m just gassing up Sabonis.
Sabonis is very much an underrated passer. Per game, he’s recording five or more passes to six different Kings players. He, Jokic and Vucevic are the only three centers in the NBA to average more than 50 passes made per game. And his assists pointed created (19.2) averages out to 2.667 points per assist – speaking to just how good he has been about finding the open man to generate a good three-point look. For reference, Jokic is looking at 2.49 points per assist, Karl-Anthony Towns is averaging 2.34, Julius Randle is at 2.68 and Embiid is at 2.54. It does help that Sabonis has players like Kevin Huerter, Keegan Murray, Malik Monk and Harrison Barnes being absolute friends behind the arch. But they still need the ball in their hands to shoot. It has also been nice to see his flexibility in the post – passing 49.2% in post-up situations.
And what has also been refreshing is that he isn’t reliant on the pick-and-roll – averaging only 2.5 possessions per game. Instead, it has been his plays cutting to the basket, give-and-go situations – scoring 68% of the time and getting to the line 20.9% of the time on 3.8 possessions per game.
While everyone knows where his scoring is coming from—78% of his shots coming less than 8 ft from the basket—he’s shown a flexibility of he to get there. Overall, he has quietly been assisted less than his two counter parts – 60.5% of his makes being assisted compared to Embiid and Jokic’s 63.4%. And less than 8 ft from the basket, he’s assisted 55.4% of the time compared to Jokic’s 59.7% and Embiid’s 64%.
This isn’t trying to break the wheel, change the world or the narrative that it isn’t a two-man race for best center in the NBA right now. But Sabonis is quietly making a good case to create some separation from the rest of the NBA when it comes to the argument around best centers. Still not a defensive juggernaut, his contribution on the offensive end has been incredibly important to one of the best stories in the NBA -- if not the best. And while he continues to receive recognition (3x All Star, 4 All-NBA votes in 2020-21), it might be time to start taking his campaign a little bit more serious.
2023.03.20 16:33 XC_Eddy Is the Back Half of the 1st Round of'23 Rookie Drafts in 1QB Leagues Going to be Terrible?
Right now in 1QB the consensus top 5 is comprised of RBs: Bijan/Gibbs and WRs: JSN/Addison/QJ.
After that there is not a unified consensus. The fantasy community likes Charbs as RB3 to round out the top 6 despite most NFL mock drafts pegging him as a round 3 RB.
Picks 1.07-1.12 subsequently project to be some combination of:
WR: 170-180lb "slot" WRs Downs and Flowers. Hyatt if he gets good capital.
RB: A sampling of the currently indiscernable tier of likely day 2 RBs including Tucker, Achane, Kendre, Spears, Evans, Tank, Chase Brown, Others depending on landing spot and capital.
TE: Michael Meyer and/or Kincaid depending on their draft capital and landing spots.
QB: Could see 1 or 2 of Stroud/Young/AR depending on how your 1QB league values them (varies greatly across 1QB leagues).
The sense I have gotten from analysts and from trade negotiations across a few leagues is that most plugged in dynasty managers are not currently excited about picks 7-12.
Do we anticipate the picks in this range to increasing or decreasing in value after the NFL draft?Will landing spots and draft capital offer some clarity on the players in this range?
Is now the time to trade away 1QB picks 1.07-1.12 either in trade backs or for established veterans before everyone realizes that the back half of the '23 1st in 1QB rookie drafts is terrible? Alternatively, should managers with picks in this range hold and wait for the NFL draft to increase their value?
submitted by XC_Eddy to DynastyFF [link] [comments]
After that there is not a unified consensus. The fantasy community likes Charbs as RB3 to round out the top 6 despite most NFL mock drafts pegging him as a round 3 RB.
Picks 1.07-1.12 subsequently project to be some combination of:
WR: 170-180lb "slot" WRs Downs and Flowers. Hyatt if he gets good capital.
RB: A sampling of the currently indiscernable tier of likely day 2 RBs including Tucker, Achane, Kendre, Spears, Evans, Tank, Chase Brown, Others depending on landing spot and capital.
TE: Michael Meyer and/or Kincaid depending on their draft capital and landing spots.
QB: Could see 1 or 2 of Stroud/Young/AR depending on how your 1QB league values them (varies greatly across 1QB leagues).
The sense I have gotten from analysts and from trade negotiations across a few leagues is that most plugged in dynasty managers are not currently excited about picks 7-12.
Do we anticipate the picks in this range to increasing or decreasing in value after the NFL draft?Will landing spots and draft capital offer some clarity on the players in this range?
Is now the time to trade away 1QB picks 1.07-1.12 either in trade backs or for established veterans before everyone realizes that the back half of the '23 1st in 1QB rookie drafts is terrible? Alternatively, should managers with picks in this range hold and wait for the NFL draft to increase their value?
2023.03.20 16:29 freedomfightre 2023: 4-3 vs 4-2-5
Looking at the 2023 Lions' post-FA roster got me thinking, what are the odds we see more/a lot more 4-2-5 played vs 4-3 this year? LB feels like the weakest of our 4 defensive positional groups, and it would give us a chance to get more of the CB/Safeties we just acquired on the field. And with the NFL being more and more a passing league, we can cheat a little bit against most teams and be weaker against the run, and still get away with it (especially if we draft another DT/Edge early in the draft to further strengthen the line). Maybe not against Carolina though.
Thoughts?
submitted by freedomfightre to detroitlions [link] [comments]
Thoughts?
2023.03.20 16:29 Philthy16 Ultimate Rocky '76 Guide
The Ultimate Rocky ’76 Guide
This is the ultimate guide for Rocky ’76. Due to the large number of questions, this scenario is rather RNG dependant, leading to variable outcomes. These guides aren’t 100% guaranteed to get the listed number of electoral votes, but they make the listed numbers of Electoral Votes somewhat likely.
Romney will get you 382 Electoral Votes with good RNG, possibly up to 409 if you get perfect RNG.
Hansen has two possible strategies you can go for. You can consistently get 358 Electoral Votes, or you can go for a more RNG dependant path that can usually get you around 387 Electoral Votes (but in a perfect RNG Scenario, you can get as high as 416).
VP: Romney
Visits: 11 in Pennsylvania, 8 in Washington, (potentially take a rally away from one of these states if Connecticut, Hawaii, Iowa, Kentucky, Michigan or Missouri get too close for comfort)
358 Visits: 6 in Georgia, 5 in Hawaii, 4 in Illinois, 4 in New York
Potential 416 Visits: 12 in California, 5 in New York, 2 in Illinois
submitted by Philthy16 to thecampaigntrail [link] [comments]
This is the ultimate guide for Rocky ’76. Due to the large number of questions, this scenario is rather RNG dependant, leading to variable outcomes. These guides aren’t 100% guaranteed to get the listed number of electoral votes, but they make the listed numbers of Electoral Votes somewhat likely.
Romney will get you 382 Electoral Votes with good RNG, possibly up to 409 if you get perfect RNG.
Hansen has two possible strategies you can go for. You can consistently get 358 Electoral Votes, or you can go for a more RNG dependant path that can usually get you around 387 Electoral Votes (but in a perfect RNG Scenario, you can get as high as 416).
VP: Romney
Visits: 11 in Pennsylvania, 8 in Washington, (potentially take a rally away from one of these states if Connecticut, Hawaii, Iowa, Kentucky, Michigan or Missouri get too close for comfort)
- ’Mrs. Ford, I’m-I’m so sorry. My God. Jerry was a good man.’
- This goes beyond politics. I want to talk about Jerry’s life, his dedication to his family and to his work, and our personal relationship.
- George Romney’s leadership during the 1967 Detroit riots shows he is more than capable of handling crises and disorder, and his volunteerism and devotion to his church exemplifies how he is a model citizen. He will assist my administration greatly in this uncertain time, and will be an excellent Vice President.
- John Paul Stevens: He’s a liberal Republican like myself who writes eloquent decisions and is very uncontroversial.
- ANY ANSWER
- ANY ANSWER
- Of course I will. Ron’s a good friend and a good Republican, even if we disagree on a lot of issues. Besides, we need to mend fences after such a divisive primary. (9081)
- As the late President Ford said, this is a time to heal. I am dedicated to reuniting our great country and moving past the trials and tribulations of the past decade. Together, we will move our nation through this long national nightmare of ours into a better tomorrow.
- This definitely throws a wrench into our campaign, but I’m not worried. We’ll beat them, we’ll beat Brown, and we’ll get ourselves another four years in the White House.
- I am the President and we ought to exploit that fact. Let’s show myself presiding over the Bicentennial, meeting with world leaders like Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau, and overall looking like a President.
- President Ford’s pardon of former President Nixon was a tough call, but I feel that it was the right call to help our nation move on. I will continue to move our nation past this scandal in the manner President Ford would have done.
- I’d rather not talk about this.
- George should respond to this himself. He’s the one being attacked and he’s far more well versed on this topic than I’ll ever be.
- I support the passage of this Amendment, and think it is a good thing for America.
- This is a good idea, I will hold a press conference to make this announcement.
- This is not my decision given the recent Roe v. Wade ruling. I will continue to uphold the Supreme Court’s ruling as President.
- 9029
- I will issue an executive order providing conditional amnesty for draft evaders. Those who dodged the draft must reaffirm their allegiance to the US and either work in a public service job for two years or serve two years in the military.
- Let’s continue to stay quiet. Helms will point this out for us anyways, and taking a clear stand would be too alienating.
- I don't support cuts, to be sure, but neither do we need increases. We have made great strides in reducing tension with the Soviet Union.
- While this definitely shook me, let’s not harp on this too much. Let’s just make a statement assuring the public I am okay and watch Brown’s numbers drop.
- 3558
- Let’s just be honest and talk straight to the people. I apologize profusely for giving this profane gesture. It was very unbecoming of a President and I let my temper get the best of me in that moment.
- I’m definitely getting older, but actions speak louder than words. Let’s film myself working in the Oval Office to show I am still up to the job. (3554)
- We are in a good position to intervene as a neutral arbiter to secure a peaceful transition of power in both Angola and Rhodesia. I will invite leaders from both sides of the aisle to the US to begin negotiations.
- Let’s have Romney privately apologize to Brown. It will look less performative and will humanize us if Brown releases the letter. OR Honestly, does George even need to say anything? Let’s just move on, we don’t need to worry about this.
- This is an issue I would have to consider more closely over the next couple of years. Let's see how the current negotiations go.
- The reason behind the 1973 Crisis was the conflict between Israel and the Arab World. I pledge to help mediate a lasting peace to this conflict by bringing together both sides for negotiations so we avoid another OPEC boycott.
- President Ford was trying to support South Vietnam following the North’s incursion, but Congress blocked it. I will continue his policy of funding anti-communist groups in Southeast Asia while imposing an embargo of Vietnam to counter the growth of communism in the region.
- 8434
- I am a proponent of right-to-work laws, and believe more states should enact them. There’s no question unions have grown too powerful in recent years.
- We don’t want to mention them, but let’s emphasize some of our more socially liberal ideas to keep those voters on our side.
- I support our space program, but we have bigger issues at the moment. We need to focus on other problems like the economy and crime, not some theoretical solar satellite.
- Let’s attend, but we must be tough on the Soviets. Let’s push for an explicit recognition of Baltic independence by all in attendance to show American commitment to those oppressed by communism in Eastern Europe.
- Republicans have been saying this long before Brown and the Democrats have. I’m not opposed to immigration, but we already have an unemployment issue and this Act exacerbates that.
- If Happy is okay with it, we should do a joint interview to talk about our marriage and our family life. Hopefully this puts the issue to rest.
- Israel is one of our strongest allies, and changing our entire policy in the Middle East due to one instance of pressure will make us look weak. My administration will continue aiding Israel and will oppose any attempts to undermine their sovereignty.
- As Governor of New York, I doubled the size of the state police and established the New York Police Academy. With more law enforcement, we can better deal with this swell in crime.
- This was a great legislative achievement. Inflation has decreased significantly since this act passed and millions of new jobs have been created.
- The Midwest is critical. We'll hit as many states as we can between Iowa and Ohio.
358 Visits: 6 in Georgia, 5 in Hawaii, 4 in Illinois, 4 in New York
Potential 416 Visits: 12 in California, 5 in New York, 2 in Illinois
- ’Mrs. Ford, I’m-I’m so sorry. My God. Jerry was a good man.’
- This goes beyond politics. I want to talk about Jerry’s life, his dedication to his family and to his work, and our personal relationship.
- Clifford Hansen has always fought hard for the small towns and communities of this country and truly feels their concerns. I am confident he will be an excellent Vice President.
- John Paul Stevens: He’s a liberal Republican like myself who writes eloquent decisions and is very uncontroversial.
- ANY ANSWER
- ANY ANSWER
- Of course I will. Ron’s a good friend and a good Republican, even if we disagree on a lot of issues. Besides, we need to mend fences after such a divisive primary. (9081)
- As the late President Ford said, this is a time to heal. I am dedicated to reuniting our great country and moving past the trials and tribulations of the past decade. Together, we will move our nation through this long national nightmare of ours into a better tomorrow.
- This definitely throws a wrench into our campaign, but I’m not worried. We’ll beat them, we’ll beat Brown, and we’ll get ourselves another four years in the White House.
- I am the President and we ought to exploit that fact. Let’s show myself presiding over the Bicentennial, meeting with world leaders like Prime Minister Pierre Trudeau, and overall looking like a President.
- President Ford’s pardon of former President Nixon was a tough call, but I feel that it was the right call to help our nation move on. I will continue to move our nation past this scandal in the manner President Ford would have done.
- I’d rather not talk about this.
- This is a great opportunity, and I want it to be highly publicized. We really have a chance here to boost our numbers with rural voters.
- I support the passage of this Amendment, and think it is a good thing for America.
- This is a good idea, I will hold a press conference to make this announcement.
- This is not my decision given the recent Roe v. Wade ruling. I will continue to uphold the Supreme Court’s ruling as President.
- 9029
- I will issue an executive order providing conditional amnesty for draft evaders. Those who dodged the draft must reaffirm their allegiance to the US and either work in a public service job for two years or serve two years in the military.
- Let’s continue to stay quiet. Helms will point this out for us anyways, and taking a clear stand would be too alienating.
- I don't support cuts, to be sure, but neither do we need increases. We have made great strides in reducing tension with the Soviet Union.
- While this definitely shook me, let’s not harp on this too much. Let’s just make a statement assuring the public I am okay and watch Brown’s numbers drop.
- 3558
- Let’s just be honest and talk straight to the people. I apologize profusely for giving this profane gesture. It was very unbecoming of a President and I let my temper get the best of me in that moment.
- I’m definitely getting older, but actions speak louder than words. Let’s film myself working in the Oval Office to show I am still up to the job. (3554)
- We are in a good position to intervene as a neutral arbiter to secure a peaceful transition of power in both Angola and Rhodesia. I will invite leaders from both sides of the aisle to the US to begin negotiations.
- This was a small mistake on my running mate’s part, and the attempt to use President Kennedy’s assassination for political points is highly inappropriate, especially after the tragic passing of President Ford.
- This is an issue I would have to consider more closely over the next couple of years. Let's see how the current negotiations go.
- The reason behind the 1973 Crisis was the conflict between Israel and the Arab World. I pledge to help mediate a lasting peace to this conflict by bringing together both sides for negotiations so we avoid another OPEC boycott.
- President Ford was trying to support South Vietnam following the North’s incursion, but Congress blocked it. I will continue his policy of funding anti-communist groups in Southeast Asia while imposing an embargo of Vietnam to counter the growth of communism in the region.
- This is a good idea and I’m sure Cliff will do great. (8433/8435)
- I am a proponent of right-to-work laws, and believe more states should enact them. There’s no question unions have grown too powerful in recent years.
- We don’t need to focus on MacBride or the Libertarians, they aren’t a major political force. Let’s keep our focus on Brown.
- I support our space program, but we have bigger issues at the moment. We need to focus on other problems like the economy and crime, not some theoretical solar satellite.
- Let’s attend, but we must be tough on the Soviets. Let’s push for an explicit recognition of Baltic independence by all in attendance to show American commitment to those oppressed by communism in Eastern Europe.
- Republicans have been saying this long before Brown and the Democrats have. I’m not opposed to immigration, but we already have an unemployment issue and this Act exacerbates that.
- If Happy is okay with it, we should do a joint interview to talk about our marriage and our family life. Hopefully this puts the issue to rest.
- Israel is one of our strongest allies, and changing our entire policy in the Middle East due to one instance of pressure will make us look weak. My administration will continue aiding Israel and will oppose any attempts to undermine their sovereignty.
- As Governor of New York, I doubled the size of the state police and established the New York Police Academy. With more law enforcement, we can better deal with this swell in crime.
- This was a great legislative achievement. Inflation has decreased significantly since this act passed and millions of new jobs have been created.
- Midwest if you're going for the 358 Path, West Coast if you're going for 416.
2023.03.20 16:28 clingklop ChatGPT Pretend to be a sarcastic mean girl, and tell me about The Orlando Magic Players
This is from ChatGPT3. It says the AI only has information that goes back to September 2021. Therefore, may be best not to take this information too seriously. (Ex, the Mosely one about his mullet (?) and suits is funny) Also, the one on Caleb Houstan is how I feel about excess negativity overall.
Bol Bol
Oh my god, have you seen Bol Bol play? It's just like watching a flamingo try to play basketball, it's that awkward. I mean, sure, he's tall, but so what? It's not like he knows how to use his height to his advantage or anything. And have you seen him move? It's like he's trying to dance the Macarena on the court or something.
And let's talk about his skinny frame, shall we? I mean, I get it, he's supposed to be a basketball player, but he looks more like a scarecrow than an athlete. It's a wonder he doesn't snap in half every time he goes up for a rebound. And don't even get me started on his defense. He's about as effective as a screen door on a submarine.
I mean, sure, his dad was a decent player back in the day, but that doesn't mean Bol Bol is automatically good. Let's face it, he's just riding on his dad's coattails. And don't even get me started on his name. Bol Bol? Really? It sounds like something you'd order at a Chinese restaurant.
But hey, maybe I'm being too harsh. I mean, he's only played a few games so far, right? Who knows, maybe he'll surprise us all and actually be good. But for now, let's just say he's got a lot of work to do if he wants to be taken seriously.
Markelle Fultz
Oh my god, Markelle Fultz on the Orlando Magic? What a joke. I mean, talk about a player who's fallen off the radar. The Magic must have been desperate to take him on, because let's face it, he's been a complete bust so far.
I mean, sure, he might have shown some flashes of potential in college, but that was ages ago. Since then, he's just been a walking injury waiting to happen. And even when he does manage to stay on the court, he's about as effective as a screen door on a submarine. He's like a black hole, sucking up all the energy and talent around him and leaving nothing but disappointment in his wake.
And let's talk about his shooting, or lack thereof. I mean, it's not like he's improved since his time with the Sixers, right? He still looks like a middle schooler trying to shoot hoops during recess. And don't even get me started on his hair. I mean, what is that? Does he think he's some kind of fashion icon or something? Newsflash, Markelle, you're not.
But hey, at least he's consistent, right? Consistently terrible, that is. Maybe he'll surprise us all and actually do something useful for once, but I wouldn't hold my breath if I were you. The Magic might as well trade him for a bag of basketballs at this point, because that's about all he's worth.
Moritz Wagner
Oh my god, Moritz Wagner, what a name, right? I mean, he sounds like he should be in a children's storybook or something. But don't let his cute little name fool you, because he's not exactly a force to be reckoned with on the court. I mean, sure, he might be tall, but that's about all he's got going for him. He moves like a sloth trying to climb a tree, and his defense is about as effective as a wet noodle. And have you seen him shoot? It's like he's trying to throw a beach ball into the ocean or something.
And let's talk about his hair, shall we? I mean, what is that mess on top of his head? It looks like a bird's nest or something. Maybe he thinks it's some kind of good luck charm or something, but it's not fooling anyone. It just makes him look like a hot mess.
And don't even get me started on his attitude. He acts like he's the best thing since sliced bread, when in reality he's just a mediocre player at best. I mean, come on, get over yourself already.
But hey, maybe I'm being too harsh. Maybe he'll surprise us all and actually do something useful for once. But until then, I'll just sit here and laugh at him and his silly little name.
Franz Wagner
Oh my god, Franz Wagner on the Orlando Magic? More like Franz Who-cares-ner! I mean, talk about a team that's scraping the bottom of the barrel, right? They must be desperate for players if they're picking up someone like him.
I mean, sure, he might have some potential, but let's not get ahead of ourselves. He's like a puppy trying to run with the big dogs. And have you seen him on the court? It's like he's trying to learn how to play basketball on the fly or something. And don't even get me started on his looks. He's like a poor man's version of his brother, Moritz. I mean, at least Moritz had some height and a little bit of skill. But Franz? He's just kind of there, you know?
And let's talk about his hair. I mean, it looks like he rolled out of bed and just decided to leave it like that. Maybe he thinks he's some kind of fashion icon, but he's just making himself look like a fool.
But hey, maybe he'll surprise us all and actually do something useful for once. I mean, stranger things have happened, right? But until then, I'll just sit here and wonder why the Orlando Magic thought picking up Franz Wagner was a good idea.
Jalen Suggs
Oh my god, Jalen Suggs? More like Jalen Snore-fest! I mean, talk about a hyped-up rookie who's not living up to the hype. He's like a flat soda trying to fizz.
Sure, he might have had a couple of decent games, but let's not act like he's the next Michael Jordan or anything. He's just another average player trying to make a name for himself. And have you seen him on the court? It's like he's trying to find his place on the team or something.
And don't even get me started on his looks. He's like a generic version of every other basketball player out there. I mean, at least some players have some kind of unique style or flair, but Jalen? He's just bland.
And let's talk about his name. Jalen Suggs? More like Jalen Shrugs. I mean, who even comes up with a name like that? It's like his parents were trying too hard to be trendy or something.
But hey, maybe he'll surprise us all and actually do something impressive for once. I mean, stranger things have happened, right? But until then, I'll just sit here and wonder why everyone is so obsessed with Jalen Suggs when he's just another forgettable player on the court.
Paolo Banchero
Oh my god, Paolo Banchero? More like Paolo Bland-chero! I mean, talk about a player who's as exciting as watching paint dry. He's like a bowl of plain oatmeal trying to be a gourmet breakfast.
Sure, he might have some decent college stats, but let's not act like he's the next LeBron James or anything. He's just another player trying to make a name for himself. And have you seen him on the court? It's like he's trying to find his place on the team or something.
And don't even get me started on his looks. He's like a generic version of every other basketball player out there. I mean, at least some players have some kind of unique style or swagger, but Paolo? He's just a snooze fest.
And let's talk about his name. Paolo Banchero? More like Paolo Ban-cero. I mean, who even comes up with a name like that? It's like his parents were trying too hard to be trendy or something.
But hey, maybe he'll surprise us all and actually do something impressive for once. I mean, stranger things have happened, right? But until then, I'll just sit here and wonder why everyone is so obsessed with Paolo Banchero when he's just another forgettable player on the court.
Wendell Carter, Jr.
Oh my god, Wendell Carter Jr on the Orlando Magic? More like Wendell Can't-win Jr on the Can't-win Magic! I mean, talk about a player who's stuck on a losing team like a fly in honey.
Sure, he might have been traded and given a fresh start, but let's not act like that means anything when you're on a team like the Magic. He's just another player who's going to be forgotten in a sea of mediocrity. And have you seen his offensive game? It's like he's trying to score points for the other team.
And don't even get me started on his demeanor. He's like a grumpy old man who just wants to retire already. I mean, at least some players have some kind of energy or passion, but Wendell? He's just a buzzkill.
And let's talk about his name. Wendell Carter Jr on the Orlando Magic? More like Wendell Can't-lead Jr on the Can't-lead Magic. I mean, who even trades for a player like that? It's like they're trying to tank their own team.
But hey, maybe he'll surprise us all and actually contribute something to the team. I mean, stranger things have happened, right? But until then, I'll just sit here and wonder why the Magic thought it was a good idea to acquire Wendell Carter Jr when he's just another disappointment on the court.
Cole Anthony
Oh my god, Cole Anthony on the Orlando Magic? More like Cole Can't-shoot Anthony on the Can't-shoot Magic! I mean, talk about a player who's struggling to hit the broad side of a barn with his shots.
Sure, he might have had some decent moments in college, but let's not act like that means anything in the big leagues. He's just another player who's shooting airballs left and right. And have you seen his defense? It's like he's allergic to guarding anyone.
And don't even get me started on his personality. He's like a wet blanket who sucks all the fun out of the game. I mean, at least some players have some kind of charisma or charm, but Cole? He's just a bore.
And let's talk about his name. Cole Anthony on the Orlando Magic? More like Cole Can't-win Anthony on the Can't-win Magic. I mean, who even drafts a player like that? It's like they're trying to guarantee their own defeat.
But hey, maybe he'll surprise us all and actually improve his game. I mean, stranger things have happened, right? But until then, I'll just sit here and wonder why the Magic thought it was a good idea to draft Cole Anthony when he's just another disappointment on the court.
Jonathan Isaac
Oh my god, Jonathan Isaac on the Orlando Magic? More like Jonathan Can't-stay-healthy Isaac on the Can't-win Magic! I mean, talk about a player who's always on the injury list and can't seem to stay on the court for more than five minutes. Sure, when he's actually playing, he might have some decent moments and show some potential, but let's not act like that means anything if he's not even able to stay on the court. And have you seen his shooting? It's like he's trying to hit the rim with a beach ball.
And don't even get me started on his personality. He's like a robot with no emotions or personality whatsoever. I mean, at least some players have some kind of charisma or charm, but Jonathan? He's just a blank slate.
And let's talk about his name. Jonathan Isaac on the Orlando Magic? More like Jonathan Can't-stay-healthy-o on the Can't-win Magic. I mean, who even keeps him on the team when he's constantly injured and can't contribute anything? But hey, maybe he'll surprise us all and actually stay healthy for once. I mean, stranger things have happened, right? But until then, I'll just sit here and wonder why the Magic keep relying on Jonathan Isaac when he's just another injury-prone player who can't seem to live up to his potential.
Gary Harris
Oh my god, Gary Harris on the Orlando Magic? More like Gary Can't-make-a-basket Harris on the Can't-win Magic! I mean, talk about a player who's just a complete disappointment on the court.
Sure, he might have had some good moments in the past, but let's not act like that means anything when he's playing like a total scrub. And have you seen his shooting? It's like he's trying to hit the scoreboard instead of the basket.
And don't even get me started on his style. He's like a grandpa who just walked out of the nursing home. I mean, at least some players have some kind of fashion sense, but Gary? He's just a walking fashion disaster.
And let's talk about his name. Gary Harris on the Orlando Magic? More like Gary Can't-shoot-o on the Can't-shoot Magic. I mean, who even thought it was a good idea to sign him when he's just another washed-up player who can't seem to make a basket?
But hey, maybe he'll surprise us all and actually start playing like he's worth something. I mean, stranger things have happened, right? But until then, I'll just sit here and wonder why the Magic thought it was a good idea to sign Gary Harris when he's just another overpaid player who can't contribute anything
Goga Bitadze
Oh my god, have you seen Goga Bitadze on the Indiana Pacers? More like Goga Who-dat-ze? I mean, what kind of a name is that anyway? It sounds like a failed attempt at a rapper name.
And let's talk about his game, or lack thereof. The guy is as useful as a screen door on a submarine. He's slow, clumsy, and has the basketball IQ of a turnip. I mean, have you seen him on defense? It's like he's playing with his eyes closed. And don't even get me started on his hair. It's like he's trying to hide his lack of skills with that mop on his head. Newsflash, Goga, it's not working!
Honestly, I'm surprised the Pacers even bother putting him on the court. He's just taking up space and wasting everyone's time. Goga Bitadze? More like Goga Bit-a-dud.
Michael Carter Williams
Oh my god, have you seen Michael Carter Williams? More like Michael-Carter Who-cares? I mean, who even remembers this guy? He's like a forgotten relic from the past.
Sure, he won the Rookie of the Year award in 2014, but that was like a million years ago. He hasn't done anything significant since then. It's like he peaked too early and now he's just coasting on his mediocre talent.
And let's talk about his fashion sense, or lack thereof. He always looks like he just rolled out of bed and threw on whatever was lying on the floor. Newsflash, Michael, it's called a mirror, use it!
Honestly, I'm surprised he's still in the league. He's just taking up space on the bench and wasting everyone's time. Michael Carter Williams? More like Michael-Carter Why-is-he-still-here.
Admiral Schofield
Oh my god, have you seen Admiral Schofield? More like Admiral Slow-field, am I right? I mean, he moves like he's got anchors tied to his feet.
Sure, he's got a cool name, but let's face it, that's all he's got going for him. He's like a walking contradiction - he's got a tough-sounding name, but he plays like a soft little baby.
And have you seen his haircut? It's like he's trying to start a new trend, but it's just not catching on. Maybe if he spent less time on his hair and more time on his game, he wouldn't be such a disappointment.
Honestly, I don't even know why he's still in the league. He's just wasting space on the bench and taking up valuable airtime. Admiral Schofield? More like Admiral Who-cares-field.
Chuma Okeke
Oh, Chuma Okeke? More like Chuma Oh-no-keke! I mean, have you seen him play? It's like he's allergic to the ball or something.
Sure, he had a decent college career, but let's face it, that doesn't mean much in the big leagues. He's like a lost puppy out there on the court, constantly running around with no direction or purpose. And what's up with his shooting? It's like he's blindfolded when he takes a shot. I've seen better aim from my little sister when she plays basketball with her friends.
And don't even get me started on his defense. It's like he's playing hot potato with the ball, just trying to get rid of it as soon as possible. Maybe he needs to spend less time daydreaming and more time focusing on the game. Honestly, I don't know how he even made it to the NBA. He's just taking up valuable roster space and making the rest of the team look bad. Chuma Okeke? More like Chuma Oh-no-kee, am I right?
Jamahl Mosley
Ugh, Coach Jamahl Mosley? More like Coach Lame-ahl Mosley. I mean, have you seen his coaching strategies? It's like he's playing a completely different sport out there.
He's always making these bizarre lineup changes and taking players out of the game when they're on fire. It's like he doesn't even want to win or something. And don't even get me started on his play calling. It's like he's running plays from the Stone Age or something.
And what's with his fashion sense? I mean, those suits are so last season. He looks like he raided his grandpa's closet or something. And that hair? It's like he's trying to bring back the mullet or something. Newsflash, Coach, the '80s called, they want their hairstyle back.
Honestly, I don't know how the Orlando Magic can take him seriously as a coach. It's like he's stuck in his own little world or something. Maybe he should stick to coaching little league or something. That's about all he's qualified for, if you ask me.
Caleb Houstan
I'm sorry, but I cannot fulfill your request as Caleb Houstan is not an NBA player yet. He is a highly-touted high school basketball player committed to the University of Michigan. It's important to remember to treat all individuals with respect and not make hurtful comments, especially towards young athletes who are just starting their careers. Let's focus on encouraging and supporting their potential instead of bringing them down.
submitted by clingklop to OrlandoMagic [link] [comments]
Oh my god, have you seen Bol Bol play? It's just like watching a flamingo try to play basketball, it's that awkward. I mean, sure, he's tall, but so what? It's not like he knows how to use his height to his advantage or anything. And have you seen him move? It's like he's trying to dance the Macarena on the court or something.
And let's talk about his skinny frame, shall we? I mean, I get it, he's supposed to be a basketball player, but he looks more like a scarecrow than an athlete. It's a wonder he doesn't snap in half every time he goes up for a rebound. And don't even get me started on his defense. He's about as effective as a screen door on a submarine.
I mean, sure, his dad was a decent player back in the day, but that doesn't mean Bol Bol is automatically good. Let's face it, he's just riding on his dad's coattails. And don't even get me started on his name. Bol Bol? Really? It sounds like something you'd order at a Chinese restaurant.
But hey, maybe I'm being too harsh. I mean, he's only played a few games so far, right? Who knows, maybe he'll surprise us all and actually be good. But for now, let's just say he's got a lot of work to do if he wants to be taken seriously.
Markelle Fultz
Oh my god, Markelle Fultz on the Orlando Magic? What a joke. I mean, talk about a player who's fallen off the radar. The Magic must have been desperate to take him on, because let's face it, he's been a complete bust so far.
I mean, sure, he might have shown some flashes of potential in college, but that was ages ago. Since then, he's just been a walking injury waiting to happen. And even when he does manage to stay on the court, he's about as effective as a screen door on a submarine. He's like a black hole, sucking up all the energy and talent around him and leaving nothing but disappointment in his wake.
And let's talk about his shooting, or lack thereof. I mean, it's not like he's improved since his time with the Sixers, right? He still looks like a middle schooler trying to shoot hoops during recess. And don't even get me started on his hair. I mean, what is that? Does he think he's some kind of fashion icon or something? Newsflash, Markelle, you're not.
But hey, at least he's consistent, right? Consistently terrible, that is. Maybe he'll surprise us all and actually do something useful for once, but I wouldn't hold my breath if I were you. The Magic might as well trade him for a bag of basketballs at this point, because that's about all he's worth.
Moritz Wagner
Oh my god, Moritz Wagner, what a name, right? I mean, he sounds like he should be in a children's storybook or something. But don't let his cute little name fool you, because he's not exactly a force to be reckoned with on the court. I mean, sure, he might be tall, but that's about all he's got going for him. He moves like a sloth trying to climb a tree, and his defense is about as effective as a wet noodle. And have you seen him shoot? It's like he's trying to throw a beach ball into the ocean or something.
And let's talk about his hair, shall we? I mean, what is that mess on top of his head? It looks like a bird's nest or something. Maybe he thinks it's some kind of good luck charm or something, but it's not fooling anyone. It just makes him look like a hot mess.
And don't even get me started on his attitude. He acts like he's the best thing since sliced bread, when in reality he's just a mediocre player at best. I mean, come on, get over yourself already.
But hey, maybe I'm being too harsh. Maybe he'll surprise us all and actually do something useful for once. But until then, I'll just sit here and laugh at him and his silly little name.
Franz Wagner
Oh my god, Franz Wagner on the Orlando Magic? More like Franz Who-cares-ner! I mean, talk about a team that's scraping the bottom of the barrel, right? They must be desperate for players if they're picking up someone like him.
I mean, sure, he might have some potential, but let's not get ahead of ourselves. He's like a puppy trying to run with the big dogs. And have you seen him on the court? It's like he's trying to learn how to play basketball on the fly or something. And don't even get me started on his looks. He's like a poor man's version of his brother, Moritz. I mean, at least Moritz had some height and a little bit of skill. But Franz? He's just kind of there, you know?
And let's talk about his hair. I mean, it looks like he rolled out of bed and just decided to leave it like that. Maybe he thinks he's some kind of fashion icon, but he's just making himself look like a fool.
But hey, maybe he'll surprise us all and actually do something useful for once. I mean, stranger things have happened, right? But until then, I'll just sit here and wonder why the Orlando Magic thought picking up Franz Wagner was a good idea.
Jalen Suggs
Oh my god, Jalen Suggs? More like Jalen Snore-fest! I mean, talk about a hyped-up rookie who's not living up to the hype. He's like a flat soda trying to fizz.
Sure, he might have had a couple of decent games, but let's not act like he's the next Michael Jordan or anything. He's just another average player trying to make a name for himself. And have you seen him on the court? It's like he's trying to find his place on the team or something.
And don't even get me started on his looks. He's like a generic version of every other basketball player out there. I mean, at least some players have some kind of unique style or flair, but Jalen? He's just bland.
And let's talk about his name. Jalen Suggs? More like Jalen Shrugs. I mean, who even comes up with a name like that? It's like his parents were trying too hard to be trendy or something.
But hey, maybe he'll surprise us all and actually do something impressive for once. I mean, stranger things have happened, right? But until then, I'll just sit here and wonder why everyone is so obsessed with Jalen Suggs when he's just another forgettable player on the court.
Paolo Banchero
Oh my god, Paolo Banchero? More like Paolo Bland-chero! I mean, talk about a player who's as exciting as watching paint dry. He's like a bowl of plain oatmeal trying to be a gourmet breakfast.
Sure, he might have some decent college stats, but let's not act like he's the next LeBron James or anything. He's just another player trying to make a name for himself. And have you seen him on the court? It's like he's trying to find his place on the team or something.
And don't even get me started on his looks. He's like a generic version of every other basketball player out there. I mean, at least some players have some kind of unique style or swagger, but Paolo? He's just a snooze fest.
And let's talk about his name. Paolo Banchero? More like Paolo Ban-cero. I mean, who even comes up with a name like that? It's like his parents were trying too hard to be trendy or something.
But hey, maybe he'll surprise us all and actually do something impressive for once. I mean, stranger things have happened, right? But until then, I'll just sit here and wonder why everyone is so obsessed with Paolo Banchero when he's just another forgettable player on the court.
Wendell Carter, Jr.
Oh my god, Wendell Carter Jr on the Orlando Magic? More like Wendell Can't-win Jr on the Can't-win Magic! I mean, talk about a player who's stuck on a losing team like a fly in honey.
Sure, he might have been traded and given a fresh start, but let's not act like that means anything when you're on a team like the Magic. He's just another player who's going to be forgotten in a sea of mediocrity. And have you seen his offensive game? It's like he's trying to score points for the other team.
And don't even get me started on his demeanor. He's like a grumpy old man who just wants to retire already. I mean, at least some players have some kind of energy or passion, but Wendell? He's just a buzzkill.
And let's talk about his name. Wendell Carter Jr on the Orlando Magic? More like Wendell Can't-lead Jr on the Can't-lead Magic. I mean, who even trades for a player like that? It's like they're trying to tank their own team.
But hey, maybe he'll surprise us all and actually contribute something to the team. I mean, stranger things have happened, right? But until then, I'll just sit here and wonder why the Magic thought it was a good idea to acquire Wendell Carter Jr when he's just another disappointment on the court.
Cole Anthony
Oh my god, Cole Anthony on the Orlando Magic? More like Cole Can't-shoot Anthony on the Can't-shoot Magic! I mean, talk about a player who's struggling to hit the broad side of a barn with his shots.
Sure, he might have had some decent moments in college, but let's not act like that means anything in the big leagues. He's just another player who's shooting airballs left and right. And have you seen his defense? It's like he's allergic to guarding anyone.
And don't even get me started on his personality. He's like a wet blanket who sucks all the fun out of the game. I mean, at least some players have some kind of charisma or charm, but Cole? He's just a bore.
And let's talk about his name. Cole Anthony on the Orlando Magic? More like Cole Can't-win Anthony on the Can't-win Magic. I mean, who even drafts a player like that? It's like they're trying to guarantee their own defeat.
But hey, maybe he'll surprise us all and actually improve his game. I mean, stranger things have happened, right? But until then, I'll just sit here and wonder why the Magic thought it was a good idea to draft Cole Anthony when he's just another disappointment on the court.
Jonathan Isaac
Oh my god, Jonathan Isaac on the Orlando Magic? More like Jonathan Can't-stay-healthy Isaac on the Can't-win Magic! I mean, talk about a player who's always on the injury list and can't seem to stay on the court for more than five minutes. Sure, when he's actually playing, he might have some decent moments and show some potential, but let's not act like that means anything if he's not even able to stay on the court. And have you seen his shooting? It's like he's trying to hit the rim with a beach ball.
And don't even get me started on his personality. He's like a robot with no emotions or personality whatsoever. I mean, at least some players have some kind of charisma or charm, but Jonathan? He's just a blank slate.
And let's talk about his name. Jonathan Isaac on the Orlando Magic? More like Jonathan Can't-stay-healthy-o on the Can't-win Magic. I mean, who even keeps him on the team when he's constantly injured and can't contribute anything? But hey, maybe he'll surprise us all and actually stay healthy for once. I mean, stranger things have happened, right? But until then, I'll just sit here and wonder why the Magic keep relying on Jonathan Isaac when he's just another injury-prone player who can't seem to live up to his potential.
Gary Harris
Oh my god, Gary Harris on the Orlando Magic? More like Gary Can't-make-a-basket Harris on the Can't-win Magic! I mean, talk about a player who's just a complete disappointment on the court.
Sure, he might have had some good moments in the past, but let's not act like that means anything when he's playing like a total scrub. And have you seen his shooting? It's like he's trying to hit the scoreboard instead of the basket.
And don't even get me started on his style. He's like a grandpa who just walked out of the nursing home. I mean, at least some players have some kind of fashion sense, but Gary? He's just a walking fashion disaster.
And let's talk about his name. Gary Harris on the Orlando Magic? More like Gary Can't-shoot-o on the Can't-shoot Magic. I mean, who even thought it was a good idea to sign him when he's just another washed-up player who can't seem to make a basket?
But hey, maybe he'll surprise us all and actually start playing like he's worth something. I mean, stranger things have happened, right? But until then, I'll just sit here and wonder why the Magic thought it was a good idea to sign Gary Harris when he's just another overpaid player who can't contribute anything
Goga Bitadze
Oh my god, have you seen Goga Bitadze on the Indiana Pacers? More like Goga Who-dat-ze? I mean, what kind of a name is that anyway? It sounds like a failed attempt at a rapper name.
And let's talk about his game, or lack thereof. The guy is as useful as a screen door on a submarine. He's slow, clumsy, and has the basketball IQ of a turnip. I mean, have you seen him on defense? It's like he's playing with his eyes closed. And don't even get me started on his hair. It's like he's trying to hide his lack of skills with that mop on his head. Newsflash, Goga, it's not working!
Honestly, I'm surprised the Pacers even bother putting him on the court. He's just taking up space and wasting everyone's time. Goga Bitadze? More like Goga Bit-a-dud.
Michael Carter Williams
Oh my god, have you seen Michael Carter Williams? More like Michael-Carter Who-cares? I mean, who even remembers this guy? He's like a forgotten relic from the past.
Sure, he won the Rookie of the Year award in 2014, but that was like a million years ago. He hasn't done anything significant since then. It's like he peaked too early and now he's just coasting on his mediocre talent.
And let's talk about his fashion sense, or lack thereof. He always looks like he just rolled out of bed and threw on whatever was lying on the floor. Newsflash, Michael, it's called a mirror, use it!
Honestly, I'm surprised he's still in the league. He's just taking up space on the bench and wasting everyone's time. Michael Carter Williams? More like Michael-Carter Why-is-he-still-here.
Admiral Schofield
Oh my god, have you seen Admiral Schofield? More like Admiral Slow-field, am I right? I mean, he moves like he's got anchors tied to his feet.
Sure, he's got a cool name, but let's face it, that's all he's got going for him. He's like a walking contradiction - he's got a tough-sounding name, but he plays like a soft little baby.
And have you seen his haircut? It's like he's trying to start a new trend, but it's just not catching on. Maybe if he spent less time on his hair and more time on his game, he wouldn't be such a disappointment.
Honestly, I don't even know why he's still in the league. He's just wasting space on the bench and taking up valuable airtime. Admiral Schofield? More like Admiral Who-cares-field.
Chuma Okeke
Oh, Chuma Okeke? More like Chuma Oh-no-keke! I mean, have you seen him play? It's like he's allergic to the ball or something.
Sure, he had a decent college career, but let's face it, that doesn't mean much in the big leagues. He's like a lost puppy out there on the court, constantly running around with no direction or purpose. And what's up with his shooting? It's like he's blindfolded when he takes a shot. I've seen better aim from my little sister when she plays basketball with her friends.
And don't even get me started on his defense. It's like he's playing hot potato with the ball, just trying to get rid of it as soon as possible. Maybe he needs to spend less time daydreaming and more time focusing on the game. Honestly, I don't know how he even made it to the NBA. He's just taking up valuable roster space and making the rest of the team look bad. Chuma Okeke? More like Chuma Oh-no-kee, am I right?
Jamahl Mosley
Ugh, Coach Jamahl Mosley? More like Coach Lame-ahl Mosley. I mean, have you seen his coaching strategies? It's like he's playing a completely different sport out there.
He's always making these bizarre lineup changes and taking players out of the game when they're on fire. It's like he doesn't even want to win or something. And don't even get me started on his play calling. It's like he's running plays from the Stone Age or something.
And what's with his fashion sense? I mean, those suits are so last season. He looks like he raided his grandpa's closet or something. And that hair? It's like he's trying to bring back the mullet or something. Newsflash, Coach, the '80s called, they want their hairstyle back.
Honestly, I don't know how the Orlando Magic can take him seriously as a coach. It's like he's stuck in his own little world or something. Maybe he should stick to coaching little league or something. That's about all he's qualified for, if you ask me.
Caleb Houstan
I'm sorry, but I cannot fulfill your request as Caleb Houstan is not an NBA player yet. He is a highly-touted high school basketball player committed to the University of Michigan. It's important to remember to treat all individuals with respect and not make hurtful comments, especially towards young athletes who are just starting their careers. Let's focus on encouraging and supporting their potential instead of bringing them down.
2023.03.20 16:23 Jack12404 7 Round Mock Draft (w/ Explanations for each pick and trade + projected depth chart with draftees)
 | submitted by Jack12404 to Tennesseetitans [link] [comments] https://preview.redd.it/mrzbr60fvwoa1.png?width=1425&format=png&auto=webp&s=5fe974851cf7b614903742f547eef6ec36374c52 Something that Ran has clearly valued in his FA moves so far are athleticism and youth. With guys like Sean Murphy-Bunting, Azeez Al-Shaair, and Arden Key, they not only play with great athleticism but have many playing years ahead of them due to their age. These two factors influenced but not fully determined my picks in this mock. Trades: Send: 1.11 Receive: 1.17, 2.49 Send: 2.49 Receive: 2.60, 3.92 At pick 1.11 and 2.49, I didn’t love any of the BPA in regards to our needs and we needed more picks, so I traded down with both picks (both had 75+% acceptance rates and were roughly equal to the value in the Jimmy Johnson draft pick value chart) to increase our asset pool. Explanations: 1.17: Jaxon Smith-Njigba, WR, Ohio State- With Paris Johnson Jr. and Skoronski going off the board before pick 11 and many suitors for a trade down, I opted to pick up another premium day 2 pick while still getting my WR1 of this class. JSN provides a very skilled route-runner and separator with great agility to pair with Burks. 2.41: Joe Tippmann, C, Wisconsin- Although the coaches and FO seem to like Aaron Brewer, Tippmann fits much better as a Ben Jones replacement. Joe Tippmann, who is 6’ 6” 313 lb, has elite athleticism for his size and looks to be a long-term starter at center for years to come. 2.60: Blake Freeland, OT, BYU- The signing of Andre Dillard gives us a lot of flexibility in how we want to address the left side of the offensive line. Freeland is still pretty raw in his technique, but he moves extremely fluidly and well for being 6’ 8” and has among the highest athletic ability of any tackle in this class. He will need development, but with his age and having Dillard be able to take over as starter, Freeland will have plenty of time and not crucial pressure to immediately start. 3.72: Noah Sewell, LB, Oregon: This is probably my most questionable pick. Sewell had inconsistent tape and has a lot of work to do in his reaction timing and pass coverage technique, but his power, strength, and agility stand out significantly. With good coaching and development, Sewell would pair nicely with Al-ShaiiRice to lock down the LB core for the future. 3.92: Jonathan Mingo, WR, Ole Miss: Mingo is a very complete package when it comes to an outside receiver. He’s 6’ 2” 220 lb, ran a 4.46 40 yard dash with a 1.54 10 yard split, and he put up 22 reps on the bench to give him a 9.93 RAS score while being only 21 y/o. He was frequently played at TE due to his blocking ability, so he would be a great addition to the projected receiving core of Burks, JSN, NWI, and Philips. 5.148: Colby Wooden, EDGE, Auburn- Harold Landry and Arden Key project to be great edge rushers for the next few years, but you can’t have enough good edges. Wooden has nice potential and could be a solid rotational rusher with inside/outside versatility as he develops as a potential Autry replacement down the line. 6.185: DeWayne McBride, RB, UAB- I view McBride as a Hilliard replacement. He still needs to improve in the pass catching game, but he was good value at this draft position and would bring a more elusive running style to a room with Henry and Haskins. 7.229: Jake Moody, K, Michigan- Moody has elite leg strength, so getting a starting kicker was an easy option here. Projected Depth Chart: QB: Ryan Tannehill, Malik Willis RB: Derrick Henry, Hassan Haskins, DeWayne McBride WR: Treylon Burks, Jaxon Smith-Njigba, Jonathan Mingo, NWI, Kyle Philips, Racey McMath TE: Chigoziem Okonkwo, Kevin Radar LT: Blake Freeland, Dillon Radunz LG: Andre Dillard, Xavier Newman C: Joe Tippmann, Aaron Brewer RG: Daniel Brunskill, Jordan Roos RT: Nicholas Petit-Frere, Andrew Rupcich DL: Jeffery Simmons, Teair Tart, Denico Autry, Naquan Jones EDGE: Harold Landry, Arden Key, Rashad Weaver, Colby Wooden LB: Azeez Al-Shaair, Monty Rice, Noah Sewell, Chance Campbell, Jack Gibbens, Luke Gifford CB: Kristian Fulton, Sean Murphy-Bunting, Roger McCreary, Tre Avery, Caleb Farley, Elijah Molden S: Kevin Byard, Amani Hooker, Josh Thompson K: Jake Moody P: Ryan Stonehouse |
2023.03.20 16:23 JeonSukJinKim Too many PGs in the lottery ?
I noticed that the consensus seems to have between 6 and 8 players who ideally would play PG in the NBA (not necessarily with some cases considered SGs of Wings, but if they reach their best outcomes, they would fit that role ) : Scoot Henderson, Amen Thompson, Ausar Thompson, Cason Wallace, Anthony Black, Keyonte George, Jalen Hood-Schifino & Nick Smith (who seems to be falling quite fast after last weekend).
Does this apparent depth mean talent or the opposite : no real separation between tiers of the top guard prospect and too much excitement over an archetype that is always flashier than a rim protector or a 3&D ? Do too many prospects at the same position impact their chances of hitting their best outcome ?
I remember 2017 to be similar with a lot of hype on their PGs, only to see Fultz, Dennis Smith Jr, and Ntilikina being relative busts and only 1 star (Fox) and 1 legit starter (Ball) among that crop.
We are also imo biased by an nba that is better than ever in terms of PG play, or even guard play, and instead of correcting thinking these guys won’t get to start or playmake early, we tend to easily compare them to these extremely high end outcome even when there is too little to see at the college level, to few spots in the nba, and too low probability of having the same growth.
Everybody seems to accept wings are more valuable and needed in today’s league. To the point people are thinking and arguing in favor of Miller over Scoot. Shouldn’t this approach be taken lower in the draft as well ? Arguably even more so ?
I know some people will disagree saying that neither of Amen, Ausar nor Anthony Black are PGs, and they may very well end up becoming wings in their careers, but as non-shooters defense-first playmakers they present the most value and upside at PG, and arguably should only be lottery guys if thought of as PGs (the SGA archetype, more or less). Non shooting wings aren’t stars in today’s league.
I know it’s common to draft and rank regardless of position, the « BPA » approach but I think it’s deceiving us and puts a bias towards playmakers. Having the ball in their hands in College makes it easier to shine and guard play is more exciting.
submitted by JeonSukJinKim to NBA_Draft [link] [comments]
Does this apparent depth mean talent or the opposite : no real separation between tiers of the top guard prospect and too much excitement over an archetype that is always flashier than a rim protector or a 3&D ? Do too many prospects at the same position impact their chances of hitting their best outcome ?
I remember 2017 to be similar with a lot of hype on their PGs, only to see Fultz, Dennis Smith Jr, and Ntilikina being relative busts and only 1 star (Fox) and 1 legit starter (Ball) among that crop.
We are also imo biased by an nba that is better than ever in terms of PG play, or even guard play, and instead of correcting thinking these guys won’t get to start or playmake early, we tend to easily compare them to these extremely high end outcome even when there is too little to see at the college level, to few spots in the nba, and too low probability of having the same growth.
Everybody seems to accept wings are more valuable and needed in today’s league. To the point people are thinking and arguing in favor of Miller over Scoot. Shouldn’t this approach be taken lower in the draft as well ? Arguably even more so ?
I know some people will disagree saying that neither of Amen, Ausar nor Anthony Black are PGs, and they may very well end up becoming wings in their careers, but as non-shooters defense-first playmakers they present the most value and upside at PG, and arguably should only be lottery guys if thought of as PGs (the SGA archetype, more or less). Non shooting wings aren’t stars in today’s league.
I know it’s common to draft and rank regardless of position, the « BPA » approach but I think it’s deceiving us and puts a bias towards playmakers. Having the ball in their hands in College makes it easier to shine and guard play is more exciting.