Winning virginia lottery numbers

Whatever amount you win, its never enough

2023.06.08 11:28 llowrider Whatever amount you win, its never enough

Excuse my bad english. I dont see myself as a big gambler, but shit went crazy gambling.
So last month I got lucky, i won 3.5K euros, but just before that I already lost 700 euros. I got desperate with even the 1st 100 euro loss, and didnt care how much I was losing, I was willing to play to 0 balance in my bankaccount, really stupid of me, I wasnt really thinking straight and started betting very high on slots.
Also I only wanted to spent max 100 euros, which turned into the 700 loss. Just wanted to hopefully win a couple of 100 euros, even tho the chances are low. I always knew casinos are not in our favour. And everybody in my family despises casinos. I cant even watch livestreamers, unless everybody is at sleep home.
2.8K euros profit, mission accomplished. But no... 2 days later it turned into 1.1K euros. I was devastated, thinking 2.8K was really nice. Couldnt contrentrate at work, bad mood etc etc.
Didnt care, so started playing again, again willing to play it to 0 euros (not really), I just wanted that 2.8K again, or something around that number. Turned the 1.1K euros to almost 4K profit this time. So I thought 2.8K would make me happy, 4k was even better.
4k profit woohoo. No.. no no... a big chunk of that is also already gone, lost. Have been playing lightning roulette, won big, then kept on losing. Even now my mind is like, playing that kind of roulette is easy money.
I guess its true, the house always wins in the end. Gonna try to stop playing while Iam still a bit up.
Iam really trying to understand why Iam still playing. I think even if I was up 10K, it still wouldnt be enough.
I played last year a couple of times in an online casino, won big lost it all and a lot more, lesson was learned, and just this month. But this time its like Iam under a spell. My mind is like play, just another 100 bucks. But for what... I just wanted to double or triple my initial 100 euros.
You lose you feel like shit. You win, you wanna win more. Which never works in the long run.
This addiction took me by storm. Looking back to the last 3 weeks, everything feels like a haze. I dont even remember after that 3.5k win, how I lost most of it.
Even my mom 2 weeks ago was like, you look like a junkie, get some sleep. She doesnt know but wow.
Its 11 AM here, still trying to sleep, have been checking this sub the last 2 weeks. Will probably delete this post later.
When I win I dont feel like I have a problem, life is good, when I lose, I know I have a problem.
Moral of the story... Iam an idiot. There is no endgoal in gambling, you will likely only end up with a loss. Time will tell if I learned a lesson out of this. Will try to stop playing. Good luck all overcoming this.
Another sad part is, I've seen dozens of people beg for money on the online roulette tables because they lost it all. Saw awefull and sad comments. I dont wanna be part of that. Thats whats gambling is, you can win some money that somebody else lost, its an exchange. Its evil.
submitted by llowrider to problemgambling [link] [comments]


2023.06.08 11:10 LeagueOfChesster Unlock Your Potential with a Friendly and Affordable Coach - Over 1,000 Successful Sessions in 2022 Bundle Discounts Available Free Consultation, Analysis, and Sessions Limited Openings for June.

About me
Hello there, my name is Coach Chesster(Yes, an obvious Chess reference, which is, by far, my favorite game). I've been playing League of Legends since season one, I've experienced everything from full AP Yi one-shotting my entire team to Tryndamere mains spinning around with a needlessly large rod instead of a sword. You could say I've been there during all the important historical moments of the game. I've been at the top of the ladder in Season 6 (Going between high Diamond and Challenger, based on how much time I've had to invest). I've competed in various tournaments, even being able to win a number of them, before I decided to get myself into coaching.
Coaching
I started the entire coaching thing during season 7 when one of my friends asked if I wanted to help him get out of that Diamond 4 hell. Ever since then, I was having a consistent number of sessions on a weekly basis, with my network of people slowly increasing(One of them actually gave me the idea to advertise on Reddit, which I did eventually accept!) I've coached more than 700 individuals ever since I started and I can proudly say I've had more than 500 sessions this year alone! So, if you are looking for someone who is around for more than 5 days actually add me.
Some of my personal coaching achievements include
Getting a player from Silver 1 to Platinum in just 5 weeks
Getting D2 to Masters in 2 weeks
Bronze 1 to Diamond, yes, this one happened as well, though it took slightly more time
Helping Duo players on NA reach Gold(They were actually stuck in Bronze 2 prior!)
Creating a coach from hard-stuck D2 after he got GM
Community
In addition to my services, I am proud to present to you our Educational community, which is steadily growing on a daily basis. Aside from Coaching, it is an amazing place to connect with other people, find friends and talk about the game all of us love and enjoy. Various events are held on a weekly basis, from 1v1 tournaments to Team Contests, with nice rewards being given out! Hint, you might win a free session!
All of our coaches have been vetted and verified, being certain all of you guys get the best service available! Every single one has peaked at least Grandmaster, with a minimum of 250 Coaching Hours to their name.
Discord Community: CLICK HERE
- Upon joining, message me in order to have a Role assigned!
Prices?
Prices for my sessions are negotiable and I can guarantee, they fall onto the affordable part of the specter!
My coaching sessions are oriented and tailored to each student's specific needs, and they do cover everything from theory to live coaching, in-game mentality, etc.
submitted by LeagueOfChesster to LeagueCoaching [link] [comments]


2023.06.08 11:05 SkepticSentinel Another rules overview by Tuomas Pirinen

Core Rules: Master the warfare of the Great Crusade! The ruleset has been written with one principle: Easy to learn, difficult to master. Covers the rules of shooting, melee combat, movement, terrain, injury charts, gameplay effects of keywords and much more. Trench Crusade uses an Alternating Activation system which ensures dynamic action where both players get to react immediately to their opponent’s moves.
The game uses a core mechanic of 2D6 Skill tests to achieve tasks. The harder the difficulty, the higher the number required to succeed. Various modifiers may grant you bonus and penalties or additional dice to add to the pool to see if you are successful. You may use any and all abilities, skills and attacks your activated model has. However, be careful! Some high-risk Actions could lead to an abrupt end of your activation, allowing your opponent to gain the initiative!
The Lore of the War-torn World: Study the maps, timelines and annals of the world at war. Discover the tale of the First Heresy and learn about the Principality of New Antioch, the dark secrets of the Black Grail and the creation of the Meta-Christs. If you dare, study the forbidden secrets of the Lords of Hell and their war against Mankind.
Weapons of the Great War: Wield more than 50 weapons of all types and dozens of pieces of special equipment and armour. Wield trench clubs, fix your bayonets to your bolt-action rifles, unleash overwhelming firepower upon your enemies with the Maxim machine guns, and devastate their ranks with grenades and deadly mustard gas.
6 Factions: Lead a fanatical band of Trench Pilgrims, control the demonic Heretic Legion troops or take command of the disciplined forces of New Antioch, the shield of Christendom! In addition, sub-rules for troops coming from across the world are provided so you can make a custom force hailing from Eire, Gallia, Britannia, Hellas, Nubia, Teutonic Fiefdoms, Hispania and more!
12 Scenarios: Battle your foes in scenarios such as Trench Warfare, Contested River Crossing, Fallen Idols and more! The more dangerous the scenario, the greater the rewards you may receive!
Campaign Rules: Play through a campaign and see your warband grow in power and prestige, unlocking ever-more challenging scenarios as you battle your way to the very heart of No Man’s Land!
Gold and Glory: To the victor, the spoils! Amass gold ducats, gems, buried relics, weapon caches and more by looting the battlefield, before bartering and trading on the black market for better armaments and luxuries. Alternatively, you can focus on winning glory and receiving unique experimental wargear, decorations and honours to bolster the capabilities of your soldiery.
Powers of Heaven and Hell: Call upon your patrons, whether Divine or Damned. Wield Goetic Magic, pray for Miracles from the seraphim or risk it all to summon aid from the Dukes of Hell. But beware! The powers beyond human understanding were not made to be wielded by mortals and their use extracts a terrible price…
Experience and Skills: Master 48 unique skills, grow your rookies into grizzled veterans and improve their abilities. But the higher you climb, the steeper the price for enhancing your Heroes.
Injuries: In the burning inferno of war, your warriors will suffer scars, both mental and physical. These rules govern how the horrors of war leave permanent mark on your fighters.
Mercenaries: Hire mercenaries to bolster your ranks and fill in specialist roles.
Roster Sheet: Organise your troops with a handy roster sheet: track the names, skills, experience, equipment, weapons and armour as well any accumulated injuries and psychological scars
submitted by SkepticSentinel to TrenchCrusade [link] [comments]


2023.06.08 10:30 Meisterbratan69 Neo Egoist League: Final Rankings

This is based on Clampkages last video. I had a few thoughts about the whole thing that I wanna share with you real quick.
I'll be using Clampkages Ranking as a base for this post, although I don't agree with some of his predictions, but it's an interesting point of view nevertheless. His final NEL Ranking goes as follows:
  1. Isagi: 300 Million
  2. Barou: 250 - 275 Million
  3. Rin: 225 - 250 Million
  4. Bachira: 200+ Million
  5. Nagi: 150+ Million
  6. Shidou: 125 Million
  7. Kunigami: 100 Million
  8. Reo: 80 - 90 Million
  9. Aiku: 70+ Million
  10. Gagamaru: 60+ Million
Honorable Mentions:
Chigiri, Yukimiya, Kurona, Niko, Karasu
1. Barous and Nagis ranking
I often see Nagi and especially Barou really high in such rankings, because obviously they are at the very top of BL right now. A fact that is often overlooked when looked at this topic is that your NEL-Value doesn't increase at a steady rate. If players don't get better over time and manage to top their previous performances, their values won't increase.
Both Nagi and Barou got their rank by their outstanding performance in the last round, Nagi with his amazing Five Shot Revolver Fake Volley and Barou with his hat-trick. Fact is, if they don't manage to top this level or at least keep it up in this and next round, which would be challenging enough already, their values won't go up that much for the rest of the NEL. The Five Shot Revolver Fake Volley was deemed not recreatable by ego, and Barou must score another hat-trick this game to increase his value this far, which would be only possible if Ubers win against BM.
In my opinion, only one of them will get a significantly higher value, depending on who wins the Manshine vs. Ubers match, because it's very likely that either Barou or Nagi will be the Matchwinner. But even if they both somehow manage to evolve even beyond their current level, I highly doubt that their values would go higher than 200 Million from that.
2. Kaiser and Isagis ranking
Kaisers 300 Million has been the benchmark that's to overcome since the beginning of the NEL. Anyone in BL would basically need multiple supergoals in the next matches to reach that value. But I think it's likely Kaisers value will increase after the Ubers match due to his outstanding goal in chapter 220, making him untouchable for anyone we know that could get in reach. What I want to say with that is that it's possible that no one in BL will have a value higher or same as Kaiser, maybe they won't get near his level in the NEL arc at all.
We probably can all agree that Isagis value will increase both after the Ubers and the PXG game, the big question if it will be enough to come out on top of BL or even get on kaisers level. It's safe to say he will rank Top 5 or higher. He didn't get a really big moment until now, but he will propably get multiple big ones until the end of the NEL, he is the protagonist after all. If his value keeps growing at the current rate, he won't even be Top 10 at the end. In my opinion, this moment(s) will mainly be in the PXG game because it just makes more sense storywise and I still think that BM won't score another goal against Ubers. With only one really outstanding match, I don't see Isagi getting a ranking as high as 300 Million.
3. Kunigamis ranking
Kunigami is an interesting one. He was hyped up as the lone survivor of the Wildcard, the Noel Noah clone, Blue Locks dark horse. His performance until now didn't really live up to that, but his value increased steadily. I guess the clubs making these offers see the potential in him and his plays. Speaking of, this potential will show itself almost certainly in the PXG match after we see the wildcard flashback. Like stated, his potential is crazy high, so we're in for something that will boost his ranking significantly, maybe even a supergoal. Depending on how heavy the focus will be on him in the future, I can see him ending up in the Top 5 of BL.
4. Rin and Shidous ranking
The ranking of these two is even harder to predict as most others on this list, because they only played one full match up until now. If I got that right, they will play their third match against in the break between now and the BM match, which will be the fourth and last game for both teams. Rins and Shidous ranking after the Ubers game gave almost nothing away. They were both ranked pretty high for round 1 conditions, they both played simultaneously somehow, and Rin did overall better than Shidou. We still have no idea on how they managed to have them not killing each other on the field or the overall playstyle of PXG at all. u/MHWellington made a great post regarding this topic: link, feel free to read his post first, my theories are loosely based of this post.
I don't know if it's too much to assume they will surpass Isagis ranking after the BM/Ubers match already. Keep in mind that Isagis value will increase by a big amount after his goal. But I think it's safe to assume that they will be both over 50 Million after this match. They will definitely go for a hype moment with the next rankings like they did with Barou, the question is how big the moment will be, because they'll have to top it with the reveal after PXGs third match. A few theories on that:
  1. BM loses, Isagi made one goal but couldn't prove himself as the matchwinner. Barous value is still higher than his. Rin surpasses him and is the new number two of BL.
  2. BM wins, likely Isagi plays a big role in their victory. As he sees the new ranking he is now number two, Rin scored 2 or three goals and is now the new number one of BL.
  3. Both Rin and Shidou surpass either him or Barou, depending on who of them is ranked lower after this match.
  4. They both don't surpass Isagi but are ranked higher than him after round 2. Not much hype here, but in this case the tension until the results of PXGs third game will be much higher.
Now to the rankings after PXGs third match. Either Rin or Shidou are gonna be the new number one after this. It even could be that they're tied for first place. Depending on how high their ranking after round two is, it would be even possible that one of them gets the same value as kaiser, which would be crazy, but I don't want to rule it out.
Of course, their ranking will increase once more after the final match. I think Rin is a likely contender for BLs number one again. With Shidou it's a little bit trickier, because I see a good chance that he won't end up as 3rd or 2nd this time, but is he really gonna be number one. He would have to surpass Rin and possibly Isagi for this, so I'm not really sure.
Thank you if you have read this far. This is getting way too long, I think I'm going to make a follow-up post regarding my remaining points. Of course, these are all just my speculations and everything is highly debatable. I'd love to hear your thoughts on this topic, have a nice day :)
submitted by Meisterbratan69 to BlueLock [link] [comments]


2023.06.08 10:00 TidyCompetition Swissborg - Get a €1-€100 Crypto bonus reward for signing up and depositing €150

SwissBorg is a cryptocurrency app that lets users easily buy and sell Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.
SwissBorg are currently offering a €1-€100 free bonus for new users that set up an account and deposit €50 (or local currency equivalent).
My experience has been really positive. The sign up process is really simple and straight forward. I got approved really quickly.
Recently a new user that signed up with my link received €68.00 this was the biggest bonus one to date (Proof).
The app is super easy to use. They make buying and selling very easy. Also the rates you get are also really good. I have used lots of the crypto offers on here and SwissBorg are one of the ones with the best rates for both buying and selling (at least for Bitcoin which is what I have been using it for).
The bonus is also really good. The scratch card feature is also a nice touch. It is little attentions to detail like that that shows me they are a good company. The free €1-€100 bonus in crypto (CHSB ) is a fun way to get people involved. If you sign up you will receives a virtual scratch card that could win up to €100.
If you are would like to have a go, and are feeling lucky, please sign up with My Referral Link and see how many €€€'s you will get?
Links
Here are a couple of useful links that helped me find out more about the Swissborg service and the offer for new users:
Steps
Here are the steps I followed to get my bonus :
  1. Click on My Referral Link
  2. Enter your phone number and select 'Claim your free CHSB '
  3. Download the SwissBorg app
  4. Make a deposit of €50 or local currency equivalent (eg £45)
  5. You will receive a 'scratch card' ticket and in the app
  6. Scratch off the ticket and see how much free CHSB you have won (€1-€100 bonus)
  7. Share your referral link with others to get more rewards
I am happy to help anyone that is interested in other cryptocurrency bonus just send me a DM:)
submitted by TidyCompetition to freebitcoin [link] [comments]


2023.06.08 09:59 A_horse_a_piece77 "Yesterday's Soccer Mom Is Today's Domestic Extremist": A Guide To Surviving The Culture

Author and conservative commentator Peachy Keenan is sick and tired of yesterday's soccer mom being treated as today's "domestic extremist", in public discourse by media gatekeepers and government officials alike—and all the while parents are sheepishly and too easily abdicating their natural role as captains and defenders of the household.
https://twitter.com/KeenanPeachy/status/1666121050567110656
https://preview.redd.it/kdnwwyvt1r4b1.png?width=790&format=png&auto=webp&s=7afed3bdff34a513a8b78f22fe5e37368066ecad
"They like to make us, the normal people, the moms and dads of America into extremists. But if you look around it's pretty easy to see who the real extremists are," Keenan told Harris Faulkner on Fox prime time Tuesday night. https://www.foxnews.com/video/6328922595112
She is calling for a back to the basics while writing from deep behind 'enemy lines': southern California. "Parenting is not a game. There is no do-over. You are all that stands between your small charges and the roiling storms ahead—and the band of purple-haired nonbinary pirates that’s about to storm the deck."
Keenan has written a new handbook of sorts, or a practical guide to winning the culture war and protecting your family from the ravings of "Childless weirdos have taken over every institution we look to for guidance on how to raise good citizens..."
You can find the book here: https://www.amazon.com/Domestic-Extremist-Practical-Winning-Culture/dp/1684513529/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=Domestic+Extremist%3A+A+Practical+Guide+to+Winning+the+Culture+War&s=books&sr=1-1
Keenan holds nothing back in the following blistering commentary from her book [emphasis ZH]:
It has become only too clear what this absence of parental authority has wrought. Truly insane people have taken over the American education system, Big Pharma, and Big Tech. They know the best way to reach the Final Solution of the American family is to focus on young, impressionable minds. We are enjoying the fruits of their labor now: an explosion of teen depression and suicide, an epidemic of children who are confused if they’re boys or girls, and an incredible 40 percent of Gen Z reporting that they are some letter in the ever-expanding alphabet soup known as LGBTQ+.
https://preview.redd.it/q8pbczeb2r4b1.png?width=722&format=png&auto=webp&s=fb9352ba054a4f428fe4c11fad712f52188e5bfc
https://twitter.com/CitizenFreePres/status/1666257317120323585
Who are the real extremists?
The below is an excerpt from Domestic Extremist: A Practical Guide to Winning the Culture War, by Peachy Keenan, with permission of the author. The book is now available from Regnery.
https://www.regnery.com/9781684513529/domestic-extremist/
* * *
You had a baby? Look at you—you’re the captain now!
Or are you?
The words on a poster taped to a teacher’s classroom door at a New Jersey public school expose the precarious corner American parents have been painted into. “If your parents aren’t accepting of your identity, I’m your mom now.” The poster featured a drawing of a mama bear tending to her bear cubs, who are each painted the color of a different LGBTQ flag.
Parents, I have bad news. You’ve got competition. Someone posted a job listing looking for a new authority figure in your house, and they hired everyone who applied. Lots of other adults, most of them unpleasant strangers, would like to raise your children for you—or at least get your children to hate you.
This may already be happening—and you’ll be the last to know! All your hard work to keep creeps, perverts, and kiddie-sniffers away from your kids may get reversed in an instant when you’re not looking.
Some parents are okay with this. They can barely handle “adulting” themselves and are thrilled not to make any tough parental decisions. Abdicating their natural role as master and commander of the household is lazy, but it’s a defensive posture. They live in terror of accusations from other parents of “closed-mindedness,” or worse, being a prude.
American parents have either forgotten their innate, God-given authority over their household or surrendered it in the face of relentless pressure over many years from the outside. Just as millennia of trickling snowmelt can hollow out mighty granite mountains and turn them into canyons, a half-century of unchecked influence by feminists and far-left progressives have chipped away at the role of parents in their children’s lives. What is left is a barren wasteland, a valley of shadows, where mothers and fathers have been reduced to nothing more than the oldest dependents in the house.
Your job as a parent is not easy, but it’s simple: feed, nurture, love, and protect. In the face of life-and-death danger—say, an escaped tiger or an ax-wielding lunatic—probably 100 percent of parents would risk their lives for their children, even die, without hesitation. So why are so many reluctant to defend their children from less obvious, but equally dangerous, scenarios?
You can tell when you’re about to be trampled by elephants. It’s trickier when the trampling is invisible and being committed by a young teacher with peace stickers on xe/xer’s car. I’ll grant that having pro- nouns in your bio is not quite the same red flag as cruising a playground in a car with no door handles on the inside, but it’s still a red flag parents need to fear.
People who manage to produce offspring are too often seduced into voluntarily surrendering their authority over them. They allow various “experts” to hold sway over their kids. Exhausted and confused, they willingly hand their kids off to the local public school teachers’ unions, the DEI struggle-session facilitators, the storytelling drag queens, and the sex-education consultants who arrive at school with teaching props, including wholesome kid-friendly items like dildos and anal lube.
Above: School hangs poster that says, \"I'm Your Mom Now\"
https://sanzi.substack.com/p/school-hangs-poster-on-the-door-that
They all share a common goal: to dilute your authority and increase their own. They aim to groom America’s children from birth to become compliant consumers of all they wish to sell them: bespoke genders, any-term abortion, strictly enforced racial hierarchies, a lifetime of therapy, prescription drugs, and whatever political and social ideology they choose to upload into their brains.
God forbid you are the only parent at your school who keeps your fifth grader home on Share Your Favorite Sex Toy Day. What will people say?
Allow me to remind you gently: it’s your job to steer the ship, avoid icebergs, prevent scurvy, and stave off mutinies. Parenting is not a game. There is no do-over. You are all that stands between your small charges and the roiling storms ahead—and the band of purple-haired nonbinary pirates that’s about to storm the deck.
Sexualized Early and Often
Imagine being the only one at the PTA meeting who stands up and objects to your second grader studying detailed diagrams of adult genitalia, or your middle schoolers instructed on how to grant consent to anal sex. (These are real sex ed guidelines introduced in New Jersey public schools in 2020.)
Your choices are stark: assert your authority over your children and get called a bigot or go along with the madness and let them take your child to places you don’t want them to go.
How bad is it? Bad enough that Tiara Mack, a “reproductive justice advocate” and “child sex educator” running for state senator in Rhode Island tweeted this in 2021: “Really excited for the house sex ed bill hearing later today. Teaching comprehensive, queer inclusive, pleasure-based sex ed was a highlight of my time teaching.”
This is who wants to talk to your six-year-old about how to “pleasure” themselves and their partner!
The first step in any cult, or any abusive relationship, is to get the victim to sever ties to their outside friends and family. Maybe you’ve seen this happen to people you know. They suddenly change their phone number, delete their social media, and have a new friend now—one that has them spellbound. Once children come to believe their mom and dad are clueless bigots and racists who are holding them back from being who they are, the cult leaders own them.
Government-run public schools have accomplished “regime change” in America and transformed us, slowly, from a society centered around the family, where the schools work for the parent, into a society centered around government employees, where families are required to supply the raw goods for the teachers’ unions to mold as they see fit.
Year after year, their assembly lines have been left unsupervised to churn out freshly minted graduates. These graduates move on to college, where their high school indoctrination is hardened and polished by professors. The end product is a citizen who will go to his grave believing a set of Ministry of Truth–approved lies: “whiteness” is intrinsically evil, abortion is health care, there are dozens of genders, America was founded on racism and must be dismantled, marriage is oppressive and bad for women, children hold you back, and unchecked sexual “exploration” with a variety of partners of every gender is the surest path to emotional happiness.
Sane people have a terrible choice to make: exercise parental authority over what their children are taught and risk financial ruin, social blackballing, and permanent cancellation—or allow their kids to be turned against them.
When a teacher or government official replaces the parent as the ultimate authority in the child’s life, all bets are off. Educators know that any adult with the authority to influence a child has the power to expose said child to any radical or extreme ideas they want.
To them, you are the extremist if you don’t think young children need to learn about sex and gender dysphoria yet. You are the extremist if you question a teacher or school administrator’s choice of books to read or lessons to teach. You are an extremely racist extremist if you’d rather not force a five-year-old to feel bad about the color of his skin and apologize for it.
In California, students in middle school can ask their school to change their names and genders in the school computer system, and the school is not permitted to inform the parents. The school authorities and the teachers are legally allowed to conspire with eleven-year-olds in sixth grade to induct them into a cult and keep it secret. Literally “it’ll be our secret,” a classic groomer move.
These government educational bureaucrats may not drive window-less vans and carry dirty magazines and candy bars to lure young boys (although let’s be honest, some do), but they are even more dangerous. Any parents who send a child into an environment like this, either knowingly or blindly, are forfeiting their authority over their kid.
The Regime’s child-catchers are prowling the locker rooms and cafeterias looking for lost, confused pre-teens to cart off to Pleasure Island, where they can get transformed into donkeys without their parents’ consent.
I wouldn’t be surprised if Disney is working on a new version of Pinocchio where he asks the Blue Fairy to turn him into a real girl.
Parental Surrender
Too many sentient adults seem to simply wait for a new update to the operating system to decide what to do with their kids. They unquestioningly accept the Current Parenting Thing, the rancid gruel served up as “education” at the local public school.
They surrender their kids to the authorities, in all their forms: teachers, principals, pediatricians, drag queens reading stories, social media influencers, YouTubers, Disney, Netflix, TikTok, the Kardashians—anyone who is credentialed as a “kid expert” or “important” now holds more sway over American kids than their own mothers and fathers. “Who am I to tell my kids how to behave, or what to learn, or how to think about the world? I’m just a random person who had a baby. I made plenty of mistakes in my life. How can I possibly ask my children to obey me?”
This is why we can’t have nice things. This is why healthy toddlers were kept in COVID masks for two years while they sat in sandboxes alone, outside, in rain or sleet. This is why you see massive brawls happening at middle schools, where kids punch their own teachers. This is why children are indoctrinated into the cult of trans, coached and groomed to say their pronouns, to switch genders, to explore various “sexualities” and “identities.” This is why mothers pimp out their own children as “drag kids” and put little boys in princess dresses and post the photos on Instagram while thousands of likes wash over them.
This is what abdicating the parenting throne looks like. Childless weirdos have taken over every institution we look to for guidance on how to raise good citizens, and no, I’m not talking about Catholic priests.
It has become only too clear what this absence of parental authority has wrought. Truly insane people have taken over the American education system, Big Pharma, and Big Tech. They know the best way to reach the Final Solution of the American family is to focus on young, impressionable minds.
We are enjoying the fruits of their labor now: an explosion of teen depression and suicide, an epidemic of children who are confused if they’re boys or girls, and an incredible 40 percent of Gen Z reporting that they are some letter in the ever-expanding alphabet soup known as LGBTQ+.
Everywhere, in every way, the fertile, fallow minds of children are being terraformed by people who identify as “fur baby” parents.
I wouldn’t let fur baby parents walk my dog, let alone educate my eight-year-old.
Authority Atrophied
This is why you must exercise your parental authority early and often. You must speak up!
“No, I don’t want you to ask my teenage son if he’s comfortable with his gender during his doctor visit.”
“No, you can’t wear your sister’s Elsa dress to school today, because boys don’t wear dresses, now get in the car and never ask me that again.”
“No, you can’t buy those shorts that display the entire lower half of your rear end.”
“No, you can’t have a TikTok account, and if I find it on your phone, say goodbye to the phone.”
Parental authority makes you the heavy in the house and the bouncer at the door. Pull on your big boy pants and lay down the law, or the law is going to lay down all over you.
Peachy Keenan is author of Domestic Extremist: A Practical Guide to Winning the Culture War.
submitted by A_horse_a_piece77 to DoorCountyALT [link] [comments]


2023.06.08 09:59 A_horse_a_piece77 "Yesterday's Soccer Mom Is Today's Domestic Extremist": A Guide To Surviving The Culture

Author and conservative commentator Peachy Keenan is sick and tired of yesterday's soccer mom being treated as today's "domestic extremist" in public discourse by media gatekeepers and government officials alike—and all the while parents are sheepishly and too easily abdicating their natural role as captains and defenders of the household.
https://twitter.com/KeenanPeachy/status/1666121050567110656
https://preview.redd.it/078zp8gv1r4b1.png?width=790&format=png&auto=webp&s=f57ec8ab475fb228079af0757d6b906c49ec1b8a
"They like to make us, the normal people, the moms and dads of America into extremists. But if you look around it's pretty easy to see who the real extremists are," Keenan told Harris Faulkner on Fox prime time Tuesday night. https://www.foxnews.com/video/6328922595112
She is calling for a back to the basics while writing from deep behind 'enemy lines': southern California. "Parenting is not a game. There is no do-over. You are all that stands between your small charges and the roiling storms ahead—and the band of purple-haired nonbinary pirates that’s about to storm the deck."
Keenan has written a new handbook of sorts, or a practical guide to winning the culture war and protecting your family from the ravings of "Childless weirdos have taken over every institution we look to for guidance on how to raise good citizens..."
You can find the book here: https://www.amazon.com/Domestic-Extremist-Practical-Winning-Culture/dp/1684513529/ref=sr_1_1?keywords=Domestic+Extremist%3A+A+Practical+Guide+to+Winning+the+Culture+War&s=books&sr=1-1
Keenan holds nothing back in the following blistering commentary from her book [emphasis ZH]:
It has become only too clear what this absence of parental authority has wrought. Truly insane people have taken over the American education system, Big Pharma, and Big Tech. They know the best way to reach the Final Solution of the American family is to focus on young, impressionable minds. We are enjoying the fruits of their labor now: an explosion of teen depression and suicide, an epidemic of children who are confused if they’re boys or girls, and an incredible 40 percent of Gen Z reporting that they are some letter in the ever-expanding alphabet soup known as LGBTQ+.
https://preview.redd.it/8qucazob2r4b1.png?width=722&format=png&auto=webp&s=e2798bd1cdba17e1eb875dad8784bb2893bc2330
https://twitter.com/CitizenFreePres/status/1666257317120323585
Who are the real extremists?
The below is an excerpt from Domestic Extremist: A Practical Guide to Winning the Culture War, by Peachy Keenan, with permission of the author. The book is now available from Regnery.
https://www.regnery.com/9781684513529/domestic-extremist/
* * *
You had a baby? Look at you—you’re the captain now!
Or are you?
The words on a poster taped to a teacher’s classroom door at a New Jersey public school expose the precarious corner American parents have been painted into. “If your parents aren’t accepting of your identity, I’m your mom now.” The poster featured a drawing of a mama bear tending to her bear cubs, who are each painted the color of a different LGBTQ flag.
Parents, I have bad news. You’ve got competition. Someone posted a job listing looking for a new authority figure in your house, and they hired everyone who applied. Lots of other adults, most of them unpleasant strangers, would like to raise your children for you—or at least get your children to hate you.
This may already be happening—and you’ll be the last to know! All your hard work to keep creeps, perverts, and kiddie-sniffers away from your kids may get reversed in an instant when you’re not looking.
Some parents are okay with this. They can barely handle “adulting” themselves and are thrilled not to make any tough parental decisions. Abdicating their natural role as master and commander of the household is lazy, but it’s a defensive posture. They live in terror of accusations from other parents of “closed-mindedness,” or worse, being a prude.
American parents have either forgotten their innate, God-given authority over their household or surrendered it in the face of relentless pressure over many years from the outside. Just as millennia of trickling snowmelt can hollow out mighty granite mountains and turn them into canyons, a half-century of unchecked influence by feminists and far-left progressives have chipped away at the role of parents in their children’s lives. What is left is a barren wasteland, a valley of shadows, where mothers and fathers have been reduced to nothing more than the oldest dependents in the house.
Your job as a parent is not easy, but it’s simple: feed, nurture, love, and protect. In the face of life-and-death danger—say, an escaped tiger or an ax-wielding lunatic—probably 100 percent of parents would risk their lives for their children, even die, without hesitation. So why are so many reluctant to defend their children from less obvious, but equally dangerous, scenarios?
You can tell when you’re about to be trampled by elephants. It’s trickier when the trampling is invisible and being committed by a young teacher with peace stickers on xe/xer’s car. I’ll grant that having pro- nouns in your bio is not quite the same red flag as cruising a playground in a car with no door handles on the inside, but it’s still a red flag parents need to fear.
People who manage to produce offspring are too often seduced into voluntarily surrendering their authority over them. They allow various “experts” to hold sway over their kids. Exhausted and confused, they willingly hand their kids off to the local public school teachers’ unions, the DEI struggle-session facilitators, the storytelling drag queens, and the sex-education consultants who arrive at school with teaching props, including wholesome kid-friendly items like dildos and anal lube.
Above: School Hangs poster on the door that says, \"I'm Your Mom Now\"
https://sanzi.substack.com/p/school-hangs-poster-on-the-door-that
They all share a common goal: to dilute your authority and increase their own. They aim to groom America’s children from birth to become compliant consumers of all they wish to sell them: bespoke genders, any-term abortion, strictly enforced racial hierarchies, a lifetime of therapy, prescription drugs, and whatever political and social ideology they choose to upload into their brains.
God forbid you are the only parent at your school who keeps your fifth grader home on Share Your Favorite Sex Toy Day. What will people say?
Allow me to remind you gently: it’s your job to steer the ship, avoid icebergs, prevent scurvy, and stave off mutinies. Parenting is not a game. There is no do-over. You are all that stands between your small charges and the roiling storms ahead—and the band of purple-haired nonbinary pirates that’s about to storm the deck.
Sexualized Early and Often
Imagine being the only one at the PTA meeting who stands up and objects to your second grader studying detailed diagrams of adult genitalia, or your middle schoolers instructed on how to grant consent to anal sex. (These are real sex ed guidelines introduced in New Jersey public schools in 2020.)
Your choices are stark: assert your authority over your children and get called a bigot or go along with the madness and let them take your child to places you don’t want them to go.
How bad is it? Bad enough that Tiara Mack, a “reproductive justice advocate” and “child sex educator” running for state senator in Rhode Island tweeted this in 2021: “Really excited for the house sex ed bill hearing later today. Teaching comprehensive, queer inclusive, pleasure-based sex ed was a highlight of my time teaching.”
This is who wants to talk to your six-year-old about how to “pleasure” themselves and their partner!
The first step in any cult, or any abusive relationship, is to get the victim to sever ties to their outside friends and family. Maybe you’ve seen this happen to people you know. They suddenly change their phone number, delete their social media, and have a new friend now—one that has them spellbound. Once children come to believe their mom and dad are clueless bigots and racists who are holding them back from being who they are, the cult leaders own them.
Government-run public schools have accomplished “regime change” in America and transformed us, slowly, from a society centered around the family, where the schools work for the parent, into a society centered around government employees, where families are required to supply the raw goods for the teachers’ unions to mold as they see fit.
Year after year, their assembly lines have been left unsupervised to churn out freshly minted graduates. These graduates move on to college, where their high school indoctrination is hardened and polished by professors. The end product is a citizen who will go to his grave believing a set of Ministry of Truth–approved lies: “whiteness” is intrinsically evil, abortion is health care, there are dozens of genders, America was founded on racism and must be dismantled, marriage is oppressive and bad for women, children hold you back, and unchecked sexual “exploration” with a variety of partners of every gender is the surest path to emotional happiness.
Sane people have a terrible choice to make: exercise parental authority over what their children are taught and risk financial ruin, social blackballing, and permanent cancellation—or allow their kids to be turned against them.
When a teacher or government official replaces the parent as the ultimate authority in the child’s life, all bets are off. Educators know that any adult with the authority to influence a child has the power to expose said child to any radical or extreme ideas they want.
To them, you are the extremist if you don’t think young children need to learn about sex and gender dysphoria yet. You are the extremist if you question a teacher or school administrator’s choice of books to read or lessons to teach. You are an extremely racist extremist if you’d rather not force a five-year-old to feel bad about the color of his skin and apologize for it.
In California, students in middle school can ask their school to change their names and genders in the school computer system, and the school is not permitted to inform the parents. The school authorities and the teachers are legally allowed to conspire with eleven-year-olds in sixth grade to induct them into a cult and keep it secret. Literally “it’ll be our secret,” a classic groomer move.
These government educational bureaucrats may not drive window-less vans and carry dirty magazines and candy bars to lure young boys (although let’s be honest, some do), but they are even more dangerous. Any parents who send a child into an environment like this, either knowingly or blindly, are forfeiting their authority over their kid.
The Regime’s child-catchers are prowling the locker rooms and cafeterias looking for lost, confused pre-teens to cart off to Pleasure Island, where they can get transformed into donkeys without their parents’ consent.
I wouldn’t be surprised if Disney is working on a new version of Pinocchio where he asks the Blue Fairy to turn him into a real girl.
Parental Surrender
Too many sentient adults seem to simply wait for a new update to the operating system to decide what to do with their kids. They unquestioningly accept the Current Parenting Thing, the rancid gruel served up as “education” at the local public school.
They surrender their kids to the authorities, in all their forms: teachers, principals, pediatricians, drag queens reading stories, social media influencers, YouTubers, Disney, Netflix, TikTok, the Kardashians—anyone who is credentialed as a “kid expert” or “important” now holds more sway over American kids than their own mothers and fathers. “Who am I to tell my kids how to behave, or what to learn, or how to think about the world? I’m just a random person who had a baby. I made plenty of mistakes in my life. How can I possibly ask my children to obey me?”
This is why we can’t have nice things. This is why healthy toddlers were kept in COVID masks for two years while they sat in sandboxes alone, outside, in rain or sleet. This is why you see massive brawls happening at middle schools, where kids punch their own teachers. This is why children are indoctrinated into the cult of trans, coached and groomed to say their pronouns, to switch genders, to explore various “sexualities” and “identities.” This is why mothers pimp out their own children as “drag kids” and put little boys in princess dresses and post the photos on Instagram while thousands of likes wash over them.
This is what abdicating the parenting throne looks like. Childless weirdos have taken over every institution we look to for guidance on how to raise good citizens, and no, I’m not talking about Catholic priests.
It has become only too clear what this absence of parental authority has wrought. Truly insane people have taken over the American education system, Big Pharma, and Big Tech. They know the best way to reach the Final Solution of the American family is to focus on young, impressionable minds.
We are enjoying the fruits of their labor now: an explosion of teen depression and suicide, an epidemic of children who are confused if they’re boys or girls, and an incredible 40 percent of Gen Z reporting that they are some letter in the ever-expanding alphabet soup known as LGBTQ+.
Everywhere, in every way, the fertile, fallow minds of children are being terraformed by people who identify as “fur baby” parents.
I wouldn’t let fur baby parents walk my dog, let alone educate my eight-year-old.
Authority Atrophied
This is why you must exercise your parental authority early and often. You must speak up!
“No, I don’t want you to ask my teenage son if he’s comfortable with his gender during his doctor visit.”
“No, you can’t wear your sister’s Elsa dress to school today, because boys don’t wear dresses, now get in the car and never ask me that again.”
“No, you can’t buy those shorts that display the entire lower half of your rear end.”
“No, you can’t have a TikTok account, and if I find it on your phone, say goodbye to the phone.”
Parental authority makes you the heavy in the house and the bouncer at the door. Pull on your big boy pants and lay down the law, or the law is going to lay down all over you.
Peachy Keenan is author of Domestic Extremist: A Practical Guide to Winning the Culture War.
submitted by A_horse_a_piece77 to WisconsinUs [link] [comments]


2023.06.08 09:50 thejoshway Luton Sensible Transfers – Defensive Midfield

Sensible transfers – Defensive midfield
Welcome to another edition of my ‘Sensible Transfers’ series, where I analyse what I believe to be realistic transfers (to varying degrees) for Luton Town FC ahead of the 2023/24 Premier League season. In this post we discuss the defensive midfield position. with Nakamba’s loan finishing and him returning to Villa, there’s a huge void in front of the defence that needs filling. This list includes some ‘first-choice’ picks I believe are realistic, and some ‘wildcard’ picks that I think would be nice but are less realistic for one reason or another.
First-choice
I cannot stress how important it is that Luton sign Marvelous Nakamba permanently. His presence and ball-winning ability was pivotal to Luton’s rise from January onwards, providing the shield that the defence didn’t have under Nathan Jones. His wage demands might be a stumbling block, but he’s a known quantity at the club and thus worth the outlay. Bring him back!
I have been a fan of Ethan Ampadu since I saw him boss the midfield at the base of a diamond for Exeter at 16 years of age. Since a big money move to Chelsea, the versatile Ampadu has fallen victim to the loan merry-go-round that plagues Chelsea’s development team. This has allowed him to develop a pedigree playing in a number of different positions in different leagues. Given his utility in midfield and defence, either a loan or a permanent loan here could be win-win for all parties involved.
I know Hamza Choudhury didn’t pull up any trees for those lads down the road, but I’d imagine its hard to succeed in such a toxic atmosphere. He’s strong in the challenge, has Premier League experience, and is available on a free. He’s worth a punt as a rotation player in my opinion.
Daniel Neil was a key player in Sunderland’s rise into the playoffs this year. Capable of playing across the midfield, Neil was a product of Sunderland’s youth system. He chipped in with 2 goals and 4 assists this year, and could deputise for Nakamba with the potential to make the position his own in the long term. He would command a substantial fee however, having just signed a new deal in March.
Wildcards
Stefan Bajcetic is in this section as its unlikely Liverpool will loan him, but has shown enough talent in the limited time he’s been given for their first team this season that he should be under consideration. For a teenager he shows incredible poise on the ball and demonstrates an ability to dictate the tempo of a game. As Liverpool are rumoured to be signing up to 3 midfielders, he could be sent out on loan to gain more experience.
Another longshot is Tunisian anchor Ellyes Skhiri. I was impressed with Tunisia’s ability to defend at the world cup, with Skhiri key to their defensive shape. Domestically, he’s managed to chip in with 7 goals and 1 assist in the Bundesliga this season. As such, he’s likely to have a lot of suitors this year, especially as he’s out of contract.
Florian Grillitsch is set to leave Ajax on a free transfer after joining them for free last year. Ajax have not had a great season, and neither has Florian personally, only making 10 appearances in the Eredivisie. Before this, he was a solid Bundesliga defensive midfielder. A spell at Luton in the Premier League provides him with a big stage to revive his career.
submitted by thejoshway to COYH [link] [comments]


2023.06.08 09:46 ProdigalTrader (Please Help) Am I making a good decision to take TRT?

I got my blood work done. From my novice understanding everything was guchi, except my test. Here was my results; Male, 29yo Total Test 281 cFT 5.7 Estradiol 28.5 TSH/FT3/FT4 1.74/3.2/1.07 DHEA 301 HDL/LDL/TRIGs 1.74/ 3.2 / 1.07 Vitamin D/B12 36/714 SHBG 29.9 PSA 0.5 A1C 5.1
I was given 200mg TRT, HCG SQ Injection 50units and anastrozole tablets (if needed). Oh and some Vitamin D. My levels were also trash there. I've already been give one dose of TRT and have a month supply. Here's my hesitance on continuing and after thoughts, could be derived from ignorance but that's also why I'm here for a plethora of opinions from a niche audience; I was a competitive strongman competitor in college. Thru ages 19-26 I was placing in most contests. Always been naturally strong. Even now, I'm still strong albeit a bit fatter. 6ft, weighing >245lbs. I can easily rep 315 on squat, easily bench 225 for 12 reps, easily deadlift 405. None of those max effort cause I've got multiple past injuries that keep me from pushing myself to maxes. Low back issues. w/e. These days I lift with serious body builders. I'm not at their level, but I can almost keep up. Which I consider good seeing as I consider myself to be pretty out of shape. a year ago I was 195lbs, 6 pack pushing to see my 8 well, which I didn't even realize I had. Albeit- not as strong as I was when I was fatter. Only reason I'm mentioning all of this is I'm so flabbergasted that my test levels actually came back this low. I know I don't sleep enough (average 5-6 hours). I'm getting back to a more healthy state but haven't become strict with my diet; although usually I have better results by now. Going from middle weight to heavyweight is nothing new to me. I also work from home and definitely don't get enough sun. Could fixing these things further, on their own, bring my levels back to something more comparable with an athletic 29yo? I'm nervous cause I've never taken a test booster of any kind. Protein shakes, creatine, pre workout. All I've ever taken. I was competitive in an untested sport and winning medals. Idk what my levels were then, but it makes me feel like this test was somehow an outlier. I did go thru buying the prescribed medications because I just felt in the moment it's what I should do. But still. I'm cautious cause from my understanding if I continue taking this now, it's a lifelong commitment. And I guess most of all I just can't seem to find good info on a normal range of testosterone day to day or what a normal variance would be. And I'm paranoid the Doc is pushing me to this route for a few bucks in his pocket. I could be way out of line with any number of things in this post. Could be over thinking the entire thing. I will lastly add that I don't want to be average. I may not compete again (may) but I really like being in great shape. Being well above average in strength, even when cutting. And I would like to maybe body build or at least look like I do. So if I should take these results as a sign that I just had a huge drop off and should supplement to get to 1000 or more so I can hit the goals I have, I'm not outright opposed to taking any of the prescriptions. Although, it's like $180/mo. I mean I can afford it for sure, but my stingy ass can't help but recognize that's like a car payment and I imagine that only goes up from here. So what do you think. Lay it on me.
submitted by ProdigalTrader to moreplatesmoredates [link] [comments]


2023.06.08 09:35 MaoTheWizard Mitch Whiting 2.0

Mitch Whiting 2.0 submitted by MaoTheWizard to TheDeprogram [link] [comments]


2023.06.08 09:31 its_vf AFL trade news: What Sean Darcy contract talks mean for ruck merry-go-round

Essendon could join the chase for Carlton ruckman Tom De Koning, but might struggle to keep a young big man of its own. Plus why the Cats won’t land Sean Darcy.
https://www.codesports.com.au/afl/trade-hq/afl-trade-news-what-sean-darcy-contract-talks-mean-for-ruck-merrygoround/news-story/d7fe7f4d0b1f576da9b18e489095d853
Sean Darcy’s hamstring tear against Melbourne allowed Luke Jackson to take over against his old side while sparking a frenzy of speculation about the Dockers trading their No.1 ruckman.
As it happened, it also delayed a discussion that would have stopped that talk in its tracks.
Darcy had been set for talks with the Dockers and his management about a long-term extension on the contract that makes him a free agent at the end of 2024.
Those talks across Fremantle’s round 12 bye have been pushed back a couple of weeks as he gets some rest and relaxation before a big second half of the season.
As clubs across the competition try to work through how to establish an elite ruck department, the Dockers will lock away Darcy for the long-term.
For all the pre-season talk of Jackson stifling Darcy’s influence, the opposite has occurred.
As the Dockers attempted to give Lloyd Meek game time last year, Darcy averaged 64 ruck contests a game playing 87 per cent ruck and 13 per cent forward.
This season in rounds 1-10, alongside Jackson, he averaged 73 ruck contests and a 90-10 ruck forward split.
Jackson might thrive as the No.1 ruckman at times, but he was well aware when he came to Fremantle as a 21-year-old that playing alongside Darcy was the perfect way to extend his career.
And it would give Fremantle the best chance of success as he mixed rucking with a hybrid midfield role and the forward responsibility that has seen him kick six goals in the Dockers’ four-win streak (and 13.10 for the season).
So the Darcy-to-Geelong narrative won’t happen for the former Cobden man mountain as rivals look elsewhere.
Tom De Koning would have to sacrifice ruck opportunities and money to stay at Carlton, which seems increasingly unlikely.
The talks scheduled for the bye will likely drift until the end of the season as Geelong, St Kilda and Sydney chase the 23-year-old.
If he stayed it would be as the Blues’ No.2 ruckman and No.3 forward, even as his one-out ruck performance against Melbourne showed he was capable of holding down the ruck.
Last Friday’s clash against Max Gawn and Brodie Grundy was his highest-rated game for the year with 13 hitouts to advantage and two intercept marks.
If he did stay at Carlton it would be out of loyalty to the club that drafted him, and his strong mateship with his teammates.
Like Carlton, Geelong might pay him only $600,000 a season.
But the Cats can promise him the No.1 ruck position, plus a complimentary role in attack when 34-year-old Tom Hawkins eventually retires.
St Kilda can’t offer him the No.1 ruck job ahead of Rowan Marshall, but it can offer him the No.2 forward role behind Max King, with Tim Membrey 29 and currently playing VFL after a poor season with a long-running knee issue.
Essendon might throw its hat into the ring but ruckman Sam Draper is in front of him, Andrew Phillips is the in-form back-up and the Bombers might battle to hold onto third-in-line Nick Bryan.
Bryan is only contracted to the end of the season, is eager for opportunity after only one AFL game this year and is putting up massive VFL numbers to disprove theories he is only a tap ruckman without a well-rounded game.
In five VFL games this year he has averaged 134 SuperCoach points, 19 disposals, 32 hitouts, 12 hitouts to advantage, five clearances and six score involvements.
If Essendon doesn’t give him more chances – and it is trying – then a rival team will.
Meanwhile, GWS has been desperately trying to find a successor for Shane Mumford and hoped Braydon Preuss might be their man.
Yet out of the Preuss-Matt Flynn-Kieren Briggs battle, Briggs has emerged as footy’s in-form ruckman in the past three weeks.
Only just winning selection in round 10 after strong VFL form, he has been footy’s biggest surprise packet.
He was the second-highest rated player on the ground against St Kilda, the highest rated against Geelong (eight clearances, seven HTAs) and the second-highest against Richmond (two goals, six clearances).
It is early days but if he can maintain the rage at just 23 years of age, Adam Kingsley’s search for Mummy 2.0 is over.
At Port Adelaide Scott Lycett is uncontracted but back in favour, at Richmond Ivan Soldo is injured but well behind Toby Nankervis, while Nic Naitanui’s season is over with uncertainty about whether he plays on.
So Fremantle’s Darcy will be taken off the board for rival clubs, and yet it will only increase the currency of the likes of De Koning, Bryan and Lycett in a game where teams prefer to poach ruckmen rather than develop them.
submitted by its_vf to FremantleFC [link] [comments]


2023.06.08 09:21 tallfeel The Golden Pinecone Daily Tournament (8th June 2023) Stalking Horse Edition)

The Golden Pinecone Daily Tournament (8th June 2023) Stalking Horse Edition)
The Golden Pinecone Daily Tournament ( 8 June 2023 )
The future is a Golden Pinecone
(Reminder to check the other guesses before posting yours)
~~~About the Tourney~~~
Begun in the year of the Cone (July 28th, 2022), the tournament pitted Wrinkle Brains and the Memelords in a daily contest to predict the closing price of the Most Fabulous Stock in the world; Gamestop. For many months, and countless hours, we have engage in reddit combat until a victor lifts the Golden Pinecone in victorious jubilation. Season One ended in the 3rd week of April at Game #267
We’ve seen players come and go like the passing's of time, immemorial, yet many have stayed true To the game; knowing their one salvation for the day would be to win a pinecone, and all of the glory that comes with it. What started out as an elaborate game to pass the time, with charts, graphs, and beautiful artwork, has devolved into a spectacular match of Luck, Chance, Skill, and one guy with a actual DeLorean Time Machine.
This year, 2023, exploded with multiple Sub bannings, which then spread across social media platforms like dank memes on wholesome subs. Posts were taken down, and the ban hammer ran supreme, but there was one corner of the interwebs that held firm, continued to guess, and stacked up those pinecones as though winter was coming.
To those that know the price isn’t right, who accumulate, speculate, prognosticate, and DRSstigate, I salute you. You should salute yourself. It has been a glorious game these many months, however the Season One finale has completed. We thank you all for playing in the inaugural season of the Golden Pinecone! Now begins Season Two!
All Golden Pinecone seasons are hodling points between different variations in your game. With each new season, we will see massive changes to the float, fud and shill tactics, and new rewards for first time winners and special events.
We know that the Seasons of the Golden Pinecone cannot go on forever, but until phone numbers & Cells, we will be here with a daily battle of wits and guesses.
**The Rules are simple*\*
  1. Time Rule: All guesses must take place before 12:00 eastern standard time each day.
  2. No Edits: your guess is your guess, and once it is in, it cannot be changed. Early bird gets the guess.
  3. B2B sniping Rule: Last guess of the day cannot win back to back games
  4. All guesses must be in USD amounts, on the W&M sub unless previous arrangements have been made with a game moderator.
**To Win:**Guess the closest to the final daily price. (the final settled price, not including After-hours trading) Ties can happen.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Last Seasons winner: Lorien6 ( 31 Wins )
Closing Price: $26.11
Winner: Love_Is_Wonderful ( 26.00 )
Note: - A solid number 2 for LIW
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
~~~WINNERS CIRCLE~~~
MoreThingsInHeaven ( 4 )
Bloodshot_Blinkers ( 4 ) - 1 Tie
Lorien6 ( 3 )
JDAB18 ( 2 )
stevefstorms( 2 )
NurseANDit ( 2 ) - 1 Tie
Love_Is_Wonderful ( 2 )
armbrar (2) - 1 Tie
PooPlumber ( 1 )
isthatfair1234 ( 1 )
tallfeel ( 1 ) - 1 Tie
JMarie777 - ( 1 )
Transient_Moonjumper - ( 1 )
DutySpirited ( 1 )
Ok_Daikon8253 ( 1 )
Buchko24 ( 1 )
pawzonzrock ( 1 )
carbinatedmilk ( 1 )
DynastyFSU2 ( 1 )
lemos304 ( 1 ) - 1 Tie
cellardoorenterprise ( 1 ) - 1 Tie
djsneak666 ( 1 )
~~~THE BULLSEYE CREW~~~
(New for season 2, we celebrate those that ‘got it on the nose)
MoreThingsInHeaven ( 2 )
PooPlumber ( 1 )
Love_Is_Wonderful ( 1 )
Lorien6 ( 1 )
submitted by tallfeel to DRSyourGME [link] [comments]


2023.06.08 09:20 echodeck Annette (2021): Leos Carax and Sparks’ musical is meta as hell. It’s a movie about its own screenwriting process - the fate of the characters mirror the creative decisions of the filmmakers. It’s about the sacrifices required to make a true tragedy.

OK, so this takes some explaining, but hopefully it’s worth your time. Spoilers, obvs.
In 2021, Leos Carax released his debut English language movie, written by Ron and Russell Mael of Art-Pop legends Sparks and starring Adam Driver, Marion Cotillard and Simon Helberg. It received great acclaim, winning several awards, but also left many cold. It’s such an odd film, but there’s a fantastic explanation as to why it’s such a difficult movie.
There are two stories running in parallel. One is that of the comedian, the opera singer and their gifted child. The other is the story of how the filmmakers wrote this movie. It’s an allegory for its own creative process.
The character Annette is the movie Annette, and her three parents are different elements of the screenwriters’ creativity. Henry McHenry, played by Adam Driver, is Sparks’ humour and pop sensibility. The accompanist, played by Simon Helberg, is their musical talent. Ann Defrasnoux, played by Marion Cotillard, is their genius.
These characters’ fates determine what kind of movie this will be, and it doesn’t end well for any of them.
I’ve made a video that lays out the evidence for this - https://youtu.be/36ExvkMIipU. Part 2 is coming soon.
For those that don’t know, Sparks have made funny and catchy pop music for almost 50 years, influencing artists as wide ranging as Bjork, Beck, Sex Pistols, Erasure and Red Hot Chilli Peppers, making great music to this day yet somehow have remained obscure.
Leos Carax said this about this about his collaboration with Sparks: “We had 80 songs and only kept 42. There were many versions of every song, depending on where the story was going.”
So during the 8 years of development, pieces were added, removed and altered, and this concept is embedded into the movie itself. If you look at the quotations, additional music and archival movie footage used throughout, something interesting connects it: there’s an uncanny number of references to creative works that were changed into something different, moving it beyond from the artist’s initial vision. Just like ‘Annette’.
*‘The Crowd’ by King Vidor This movie from 1928 is used during a montage of Ann’s performances. Its original release was delayed because the movie studio was displeased at the lack of a happy ending. At their insistence, seven alternative happy endings were filmed.
‘Till the clouds roll by’ While Henry is babysitting, the TV shows a musical number from this 1946 Judy Garland movie. The song, ’D’ye love me’, was filmed by a different director (her husband Vincente Minnelli) but then cut from the final movie.
‘Oceans’ Footage is used from this French nature documentary which was distributed by Disney Pictures. The final cut had 20 minutes of violent footage removed to make it palatable to a young audience.
‘Rogue one’ We see this playing at a cinema while Henry rides past on his motorcycle. The Star Wars spin-off had extensive reshoots with new scenes, including a new soundtrack and ending.
‘Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs’ There are several visual parallels between ‘Annette‘ and the first feature-length Disney movie. It was originally conceived as a comedy piece, with a continuous run of jokes from the dwarfs. In later drafts, scenes were removed in order to focus more on Snow White and the Evil Queen, and less on the comic relief.
‘The Night of the Hunter’ The shot of Ann’s body falling to the depths of the ocean calls back to this 1955 American Thriller. The screenplay was by James Agee, based on his own book, but director Charles Laughton rewrote most of the script without credit. This was partly because the story features an evil preacher, highly controversial at the time, so the changes were made so that he would appear unordained.
‘Bluebeards Castle’ This opera was completed in 1911, but not taken seriously because of its single act structure. It was modified in 1912 and a new ending added in 1917.
‘National Brotherhood Week’ by Tom Lehrer This is the song that goes “and the Catholics hate the Muslims, and the Muslims hate the Catholics”. The musical satirist would often update the jokes in his songs at live performances.
‘Symphony No. 2’ by Gustav Mahler This was composed reusing elements of the composer‘s first symphony,
‘Otello’ by Verdi This was written between 1879 and 1887. Many drafts exist between the libretto first being written and its completion, with notes and letter published showing the evolution of the work as the music demanded changes to the text and vice versa.
‘Carmen’ by Bizet This was altered several times during the rehearsal for the first performance. As such, the vocal score from March 1875 shows significant changes from the version of the score sold to the publishers, which is in turn different to the orchestral score. Nobody knows which version was originally performed.
‘Madam Butterfly’ by Puccini First completed in 1904, this was withdrawn after a disastrous premiere. In total Puccini wrote five versions of this opera.
‘Norma’ by Bellini When composing this opera, Bellini wanted it to be performed by star soprano Giuditta Pasta. To entice her, he offered to retouch or even change the character completely to suit her.
‘Symphony No. 4’ by Brahms The debut performance was a scaled-down preview played on two pianos to a small audience of friends. Despite going on to be a classic, it was panned by the audience, with critic Eduard Hanslick describing it as “being given a beating by two incredibly intelligent people”.
‘La traviata’ by Verdi This opera was envisioned in a contemporary setting, but the authorities insisted it be set in the past.
‘Mother Courage and her Children’ by Bertold Bretch This 1941 play includes the quotation “War is like love, it always finds a way”, which likely serves as inspiration for ‘True love always finds a way’. For it’s second production in 1949, Brecht revised the play to make Mother Courage less sympathetic, because despite rave reviews, he felt that critics misunderstood the piece.*
These works aren’t necessarily being evoked because of their stories or themes, but because of how they were changed. Leos Carax and Sparks are showing us that the movie we’re watching is inextricably tied to the method used in creating it. In other words, it’s not just an incidental bit of trivia that ‘Annette’ had several drafts, it’s core to the understanding of the movie.
With the release of the Unlimited Edition of the soundtrack album, Sparks gave some insight into a previous draft, and it helps us to better understand the final movie. It includes a handful of demos and unused songs which show a very different trajectory for Henry McHenry. Instead of destroying his career by offending his audience, he’s instead met with indifference because falling in love and having a child has taken away his edge as a performer. We therefore know that Henry’s comedy routines were rewritten, and this fact can be used to explain a lot.
The title of Henry’s show is The Ape of God. This is a term for Satan that originated from the Middle Ages, meaning that he impersonates (or apes) godly things to make people do evil. Encyclopaedia Britannica describes it as “an evil who attempts to imitate God through spurious, malicious creations that he interpolates for the divine creations”. The word “interpolate” means “to insert something (of a different nature) into something else”, which is what the screenwriters are doing by reworking these scenes. The Henry McHenry that we see isn’t the character as originally envisioned - he’s a rewrite, and this explains the uncomfortable anti-comedy of his routines.
One of Sparks’ defining characteristics is humour, with a distinctive style of wit that’s been a constant presence in their music throughout the decades. Their songs feature colourful characters and clever pop-culture references, but with ‘Annette’ they go in the opposite direction, filling it with sadness at every turn. If you look back through Sparks’ catalogue of songs, finding something without an element of joy or humour is rare. They’re a “fun” band, but that element of fun is mostly missing in ‘Annette’ - this is fundamentally different to the Sparks we’ve seen before.
This was explained by Leos Carax when asked how the movie was reshaped from Sparks’ original screenplay.
“The only changes I made were with the writing. It was only a storyline without characters. The brothers live in this Sparks bubble, which is pop fantasy. There was a lot of irony. Irony in a cinema is a danger, I think. It has a tendency to make everything less crucial, less real. It’s a bit too easy for cinema, especially today. I had to make that irony into something else. We had to really create Henry as a character.”
Here’s the theory: Ron and Russell wrote a comedy that was true to Sparks, then employed Leos Carax to impose restrictions on the rewriting process. These were the changes necessary for the band to achieve their dream of making a true art house tragedy.
I still have lots more to share on this, but in the meantime I’d love your thoughts.
submitted by echodeck to criterion [link] [comments]


2023.06.08 09:16 Eddieblayze #57

#57
I got this Jade 57 win streak EVO and it happens to be numbered 57 😁 Not sure how they're numbered since I only saw 2 others in the marketplace, and they were numbered in the hundreds..
submitted by Eddieblayze to AEWTradingCards [link] [comments]


2023.06.08 08:46 TheMostyRoastyToasty Why don’t WG capitalise on Frontline?

I’m sure we’ve all seen how unhappy the War Thunder community is with their economy changes and players leaving the game in droves. Many have tried, or come back to, WOT but the change from huge open map and respawns with power ups back to 15-2, 3 minute long steam rolls puts a lot of players off.
There is a huge player base looking for a large scale tank game to play and this is the perfect opportunity for WG to snatch them up and increase player numbers.
It will also increase on/off player count as many people come back to the game just for frontlines and when people are getting bad MM, as we’ve all been there, and on a losing streak a few games of frontline where it doesn’t really matter if you win or lose can be just what keeps people from rage quitting.
Keep random battles as a way to earn XP, grind tanks etc and then keep FL as the chilled out, large scale game mode (unpopular opinion: if it became permanent, maybe introduce a 10% credit nerf).
I can’t really understand why WG wouldn’t do this? It seems to be shooting themselves in the foot just to keep frontlines as a temporary ‘exclusive’ mode, when it’s obviously is a popular event and people want more of it.
submitted by TheMostyRoastyToasty to WorldofTanks [link] [comments]


2023.06.08 08:46 Budget_Human Grim and Grin: Unleash Carnage with Reaper

The Reaper guy is (in my humble view) one of the heroes who is most underappreciated. Prior to being prevented from playing actively by work, I played my favorite edgelord for the last two seasons virtually exclusively up until GM4 with roughly 80% win rate. Anyway, here's what I discovered after playing reaper nonstop for around 60 hours. The first is the absurd number of mental tricks you can perform. To shift out and bait every existing cooldown to make the engage for your team as simple as possible, TP into 5 people. The majority of the time, people will focus on you rather than your team. Reaper aims to draw as much focus away from your squad as possible in addition to maximizing his damage output.
A couple TP tricks to use against Ana, Hanzo, and the widow since they are the most obnoxious targets.
Ana: TP a good 8 to 10 meters (or 25 hamburgers in freedome units) behind her so you have time to wraith and avoid the sleep. Or you could simply wait until she utilized it in a teamfight and TP behind the entire team.
Hanzo: You approach him similarly to Ana or TP RIGHT behind him, you have a 30% chance of getting one-shot, a 30% chance of killing him, and a 40% chance of having just enough time to press shift and flee.
Widow: Most annoying reaper counter, TP just behind her or die of you TP into sightline.

You wouldn't believe how much of a mental boom you can cause by simply doing that. You'll start to win a lot of teamfights if your team follows your engages and you make the enemies turn around and bait CDs. The most of the time, you can just shoot any squishy target and kill them if you're fortunate and no one turns for you. Reaper can be played super super super aggressively!

The following are the most crucial things that you must learn to avoid and detect whenever you battle such heroes:

TANKS:
- JQ E
- Orisa Speer
- Road´s Hook
Sigma´s rock

DPS:
- Echo stickys
- Hanzo/Widow existing
- Junkrat mine
- Other reaper if he has better aim
- Soldiers right click in close range
- Sojourns right click
- Tracer Q

Support:
- For the love of god, Ana sleep as often as humanly possible, avoid the nade when ulting
- Zen´s right click when you´re TPing onto him and you see that he charges it, it´s an instant 100% oneshot if you dont

The most rewarding experience in life can be had by playing very aggressively, but you must be at the top of your game when it comes to ability tracking. This is true happiness, regardless of college degrees, marriage, or winning the lotto. For real for real no cap on god.
The ult is F tier garbo as you advance in the ranks; you'll typically earn 1-2 kills or simply perish in the most egregious manner humanly conceivable.

Have fun playing reaper and loosing all your sanity in the process!

If you have any questions for that character, feel very welcome to ask.
submitted by Budget_Human to OverwatchUniversity [link] [comments]


2023.06.08 08:33 marion_and_beau How Does Every Prospect “Linked” to OKC fit?

OKC has been linked to a number of players, be it through workouts, fit, or even perceived fit/player archetype. Let’s see how each fits (in my opinion).
  1. Jarace Walker: Probably the most easy guy to imagine in an Oklahoma City jersey. He’d immediately slot into that 4 spot next to Chet and would further bolster our defensive, selfless play style.
  2. Bilal Coulibaly: If the whole “draft promise in the lotto” thing is real, there’s solid reason to believe it could’ve been Presti. But what is Coulibaly, though? At best, he’s a 3 and D playmaker with great athleticism and playmaking. At worst, he’s probably an unplayable project player for a couple of seasons.
  3. Leonard Miller: I’m not high on Miller, but I get the reason he’s been linked to OKC. We need size/rebounding, and Miller wouldn’t be an awful choice if we do stick at 12. If you believe in the 3 and D potential, he’s similar to Taylor Hendricks as a prospect; which leads us into...
  4. Taylor Hendricks: Like Walker, this is a guy we’d have to move up for. It’s easy to imagine Hendricks as the final piece of the starting lineup. Also gives us another vertical lob threat next to Chet, which would really further elevate Shai/Josh/Jalen’s production. He projects as a Jabari Smith Jr. type of player, and would fit just as seamlessly as Jarace.
  5. Derrick Lively II: Sigh, it’s not happening. We’re not drafting an unskilled big who can only play defense at 12 so he can play some backup center minutes. It’s just... not happening. I promise. Presti isn’t going to go so far to make sure we’re skilled at every position and go back on that now. This would be an awful lottery pick for a guy who would clog the lane for our ball handlers. Not happening at 12. Wouldn’t happen at 37.
submitted by marion_and_beau to Thunder [link] [comments]


2023.06.08 08:28 Lifeshardbutnotme Mod Idea: 2015 Canadian Election

The 2015 Canadian election was a three way fight between a beleaguered incumbent, a happy warrior and a left wing bulldog, all of whom had some chance of victory. I think it could be interesting. The candidate profiles would go something like this
Stephen Harper: After uniting the two conservative parties of Canada, the Progressive Conservatives and the Reform Alliance into the Conservative Party in 2003, Stephen Harper led them to three victories and one majority. He is the former leader of the Reform Alliance and has remained broadly popular within his party. Former PCs are happy that he hasn't been loud or outspoken on social issues such as gay marriage or abortion (even if he hasn't been terribly supportive either) and former Reformists are pleased with his strong, conservative, and very comprehensive economic agenda. Some, however, do accuse him of running his party like a drill sergeant.
Regardless of his previous victories and strong performance in the 2008 financial crash which Canada weathered extremely well, Harper seems to be at the end of the road. He has faced consistent attacks that he’s too partisan, especially after he was given a majority government in 2011. Most Canadians are tired of him after nearly 10 years in power and simply want new blood. Canadian politics might... might, be realigning around the conservatives however and Harper just might have a chance yet. He just has to hope the Liberals and the NDP stay fighting but if not, the tides of change may prove too much for him to overcome.
Justin Trudeau: A happy political warrior preaching "Sunny Ways", son of the nearly infamous Prime Minister, Pierre Elliott Trudeau and one of the few remaining Liberal MPs in Quebec (One of the few remaining Liberal MPs generally) after Michael Ignatieff led the party to complete disaster in 2011 and the NDP swept the province.
He won a crushing victory in the Party's leadership election and is probably the only man the Liberals could put forward with a fighting chance in Quebec, even if his family name will be somewhat detrimental to his chances in Western Canada. He must also contend with the general idea that he's too inexperienced and isn't quite ready for Prime Time quite yet when compared to his two more grizzled opponents.
The Liberals though, for the first time ever, are in third place and rumours of a political realignment are brewing. Perhaps a cut into disaffected Conservatives will be in order, perhaps undercutting the NDP by tacking more to the left on most issues would be the better option. Whatever the case, Trudeau has the unenviable task of dragging his party up from third place and he'll need to gain over 130 seats to win a majority, most don't think he's up for the task. Can Trudeau bring the Liberals back to their rightful status as the "Natural Governing Party of Canada'' or will a new political reality revolving around the Conservatives or the New Democrats be formed?
Thomas Mulcair: The party darling led the New Democrats to the opposition benches for the first time in their history and now the Party has a genuine shot at government. Tom Mulcair is not that party darling however, that status goes to Jack Layton, the man who actually won the seats in 2011 and then unfortunately passed away just 3 months after the election. Mulcair knows he’s not the party’s first choice but if he can just see it through to the elections end with some favourable results then he might be able to finally consolidate the many differences that Jack Layton was able to finesse so masterfully.
The NDP is not at the top of its game however. Two key defections, falling poll numbers and a by-election defeat to the Liberals have the party dreading the worst, a fall back to third place. There is also a significant divide between its urban and rural members alongside a divide between those who believe the party should stay firmly to the left and those to whom ideological purity is less important than winning. Mulcair had always been a more left wing member and his willingness to push for an expansion of the base has New Democrats feeling either puzzled or betrayed. For all their gains in 2011 and all the hope the party has to finally form government, it just might be the case that the party is an obstacle to its own success.
As for the man himself, Mulcair was always a bulldog in the opposition benches and everyone knows him as that, some even love him for it. He has pushed for many progressive causes such as the abolition of the senate and environmental measures but some consider him to be just a bit out of step with what most Canadians want from a government and some simply aren’t willing to elect the NDP as they’ve never been in power before.
Mulcair must take the NDP from its first ever second place ranking and win the trust of enough Canadians to put him over the top. Whether or not he’s the man to do it is definitely in doubt but hey. There’s no time like the present.
submitted by Lifeshardbutnotme to thecampaigntrail [link] [comments]


2023.06.08 08:23 Confident_Bag1477 Driving Business Forward: Unlocking Opportunities with EV Charging Stations

The Shifting Consumer Mindset Towards EVs

In recent years, the consumer mindset has experienced a significant shift in favor of electric vehicles (EVs). Surpassing a milestone in 2022, more than 50% of global car buyers expressed their intention to purchase fully battery-powered or hybrid EVs. As the number of EV drivers continues to rise, savvy business owners are paying attention and recognizing the unique opportunity to cater to this growing market by offering on-site EV charging stations.

Key Questions To Consider for Your EV Charging Business Model

Before embarking on the journey of setting up EV charging stations, there are crucial questions that business owners need to carefully consider. These questions will help shape the optimal EV charging business model for their specific circumstances. Some key questions include:
1. Defining Your Ultimate Goal: What is the primary objective of installing EV chargers? Are they intended to generate additional profits for your business or attract new clientele, tenants, or customers? Determining your goal will influence the level of investment you are willing to make and the charging fees, if any, you plan to implement.
2. Understanding Customer Dwell Time: What is the typical dwell time for your customers at your business location? This will influence the choice of charger types—standard level 2 chargers or DC fast chargers (DCFCs). If customers tend to stay for an extended period, level 2 chargers may suffice. However, if fast customer turnover is common, investing in DCFCs might be a more viable, albeit costlier, option.
3. Ownership Structure Considerations: Who will own the charging stations? Depending on your business’s location and the state and utility programs available in your area, you may have various ownership structure options. This can range from full third-party ownership by a utility or charging station provider to full ownership by your business, or a combination in between. The ownership structure will impact upfront costs and long-term profit potential.
4. Exploring Rebates and Incentives: What rebate options are available? It is essential to stay informed about incentives and government programs, such as the 30C tax credit, to ensure your business takes advantage of all available support when installing EV charging stations. Consulting with an EV Connect expert can provide valuable guidance on available incentives.

3 Ways To Set Up Your EV Charging Station Business

Although there are multiple ways to tailor an EV charging station setup to fit a business’s unique needs, three primary options have proven effective:
1. Embrace EV Charging as a Value-Added Amenity
With the projected growth of EVs in the United States, from 2.4 million in 2021 to 26.4 million by 2030, including charging stations at your business can attract new EV drivers to your property. This approach is particularly suitable for businesses that rely on commercial or residential tenancy or have a consistent flow of customers. By offering charging stations, you can not only grow revenue streams independently of your main business but also increase traffic to your primary services, creating a win-win scenario.
This EV charging business model works best for:
– Property owners and managers of multi-unit complexes.– Commercial real estate owners and landlords who lease space to other businesses, including retail stores and office spaces.– Retail store owners.– Hotel and hospitality property owners.
2. Harness the Power of EV Chargers for Strategic Marketing
Installing EV charging stations at your business serves a dual purpose. Not only does it attract existing EV drivers, but it also sends a powerful marketing message to eco-conscious consumers. Sustainable business practices have become a core concern for many individuals, as reflected in a 2022
3. Maximize Profit Potential with EV Chargers
For businesses primarily focused on profitability, EV charging stations can contribute to financial success. Tax credits, such as the 30C Tax Credit, along with state and local incentives, can significantly reduce upfront installation costs. Determining the ideal charging model, such as flat-fee or metered billing, and setting competitive pricing will help maximize profitability.

Choosing the Right EV Charging Business Model

Selecting the appropriate EV charging business model depends on understanding the goals of your business, evaluating customer behavior, exploringRead more here.
submitted by Confident_Bag1477 to electriccars [link] [comments]


2023.06.08 08:23 gosuruss Why Brandon Podziemski is worth a top 10 pick

The potential value of Brandin Podziemski seems to be overlooked, despite the compelling evidence for his merits. He represents an archetype of a player often underestimated: a white athlete from Wisconsin, attending a mid-major institution, adorned with idiosyncratic hair and an unconventional name.
Podziemski’s basketball journey is as impressive as it is unique. His introduction to the sport only occurred in his *8th grade*, yet he has emerged as the number one stats-only projected guard in this year’s NBA draft. By his sophomore year in high school, he was already scoring an average of 23 points, 10 rebounds, 3 assists, and 3 steals per game, with an impressive 43.5% shooting on 10 three-pointers per game.
Unfortunately, his junior year was marred by the COVID-19 pandemic, leading to the cancellation of the EYBL and thereby depriving him of the opportunity to showcase his prowess, a factor which likely influenced his RSCI ranking.
By his senior year, Podziemski had significantly improved, boasting an average of 35 points, 10 rebounds, 6 assists, and 4.3 steals in just 27 minutes per game, on 61% FG shooting (43% from the three-point line). Despite these remarkable statistics, his RSCI ranking was only #79. Some may attribute this low ranking to regional bias or stereotyping. Interestingly, during a late high school combine event, which was logged to synergy sports, he demonstrated his potential by averaging 23 points, 10 rebounds, 6 assists on 60/50 shooting splits across four games. Immediately following these stellar performances, he received offers from Kentucky and Kansas but decided to play for Illinois.
His first year at Illinois was less than stellar, as he only played 68 minutes on a team dominated by seniors. Despite a disappointing 22% from three-point range, if we adjust his scoring by assuming his historical three-point percentage, his per-36 minute stats align closely with his current year’s performance. An interview reveals his preference for Santa Clara’s freer, less regimented style of play compared to the more structured approach of Big Ten basketball.
At Santa Clara, Podziemski's stats improved, averaging 20 points, 9 rebounds, 4 assists, and 1.8 steals per 36-minutes, and recorded a commendable 60% true shooting percentage (43.8% from three-point range on high volume).
Two points about Podziemski's performance are noteworthy. First, his rebounding statistics could potentially be the best among any guard prospect in the past decade, securing 21.6% of all defensive rebounds and 5.3% of offensive rebounds. Second, his contributions were slightly hampered by the presence of another ball-dominant guard on his team who averaged 15 points and just 2 assists per game, which might have hindered his scoring and playmaking abilities. The eye-test strongly suggests Podziemski's passing abilities significantly exceed what his assist statistics suggest.
A misunderstanding I’ve encountered in this subreddit is the value of rebounding from guards. Every position's contribution to rebounding is vital, as it directly impacts the number of possessions per 100 your team can secure. This concept is one of the "Four Factors" identified by Dean Oliver as crucial to a team's success.
https://squared2020.com/2017/09/05/introduction-to-olivers-four-factors/
Failure to meet the rebounding requirements of your role will negatively impact your team's rebounding success, providing your opponents with additional possessions, and thereby increasing their scoring opportunities. Conversely, exceeding the the average rebound demand of your position will gain you extra possessions.
To fully appreciate these dynamics, understanding the advanced models such as Estimated Plus-Minus (EPM) or Box Plus/Minus (BPM) can be instrumental. These models aim to estimate a player's impact on team offense and defense in terms of points per 100 possessions. To provide a frame of reference, an average player has a score of +0, a replacement player -2, an All-Star player +4 or better, and an MVP is usually around +8.
If we examine players such as Jalen Brunson, Nico Mannion, and Lonnie Walker, their college rebounding statistics are less than stellar. Once they enter an NBA game, they immediately suffer a deficit of at least -1 per 100 possessions, simply from their rebounding abilties. Trae Young is noted for his subpar defense. Part of his poor defense can be attributed to his poor defensive rebounding; an opponents' offensive rebounding rate increasing by 3% when he is on the court.
Similarly, a low steal rate can put a player at a disadvantage of approximately -1 per 100 possessions, due to an inability to force turnovers at a rate comparable to the average NBA player at their position. Add inefficiencies in shooting and high turnover rates to the equation, and you can understand why Lonnie Walker's lifetime RAPM stat is -3 per 100 – his contributions fail to meet what an average player would provide in terms of team possession acquisition.
Let's use Jalen Brunson as a case study. He posted a 5.6% DREB rate and a mediocre steal rate during his college career. According to EPM, he has been a mild negative defender throughout his career, around -0.7. From his college stats, one would have expected a worse performance. Despite averaging only 3 rebounds per game and a mediocre 1.2% steal rate in the NBA, suggesting a low defensive value floor, he is only a -0.7 defender in the models. Upon closer inspection, it's evident that Brunson draws an incredible 1.6 offensive fouls per 100 possessions, which suggests he forces 2.8 turnovers per 100 - an above-average rate for guards. If he weren't drawing offensive fouls at this exceptional rate, he would be a significantly negative defender. It's noteworthy that drawing offensive fouls is an undervalued aspect of guard defense.
Returning to Brandin Podziemski, let's establish his floor. Given his exceptional rebounding stats and his intense drive, it's likely he will positively contribute to the rebounding game, potentially providing an additional +1 based on his rebounding stats alone. He posted a 2.8% steal rate, and while we lack concrete stats on his ability to draw offensive fouls, clips suggest potential in this area. Initially, he'll likely be at least neutral in the turnover game, but his defensive instincts could give him an edge in the long run. These factors suggest a higher floor than many seem to anticipate.
We should be clear: Podziemski is the most skillful prospect in the draft. He is the best shooter in the draft. He is the most well-rounded player in the draft, a remarkable feat considering he only began playing basketball in the 8th grade. When was the last time a guard began playing basketball at such a late stage and had the best NBA stat projection for a guard? His rapid ascension is prodigious. He demonstrates skill as a cunning scorer, creative passer, and a 43.8% shooter from the 3-point line with a quick release. Many of these three-pointers were self-created.
At his worst? Podziemski is an exceptional 3 and D player, possessing scoring and playmaking skills that can be activated with a simple pump fake. His shooting ability is undisputed. Some may question the defense aspect of his game, but there is little reason for concern. While he may initially be a mild negative in terms of on-ball defense, off-ball defense should be a strong point for him, given his exceptional motor, high basketball IQ, and the often overlooked importance of rebounding to defensive play.
For more evidence of his defensive awareness, consider the Twitter timeline on June 5th of a certain basketball analyst: he has shared numerous clips that demonstrate Podziemski's keen defensive instinct.
https://twitter.com/coachnatebdraft
Upon consideration, it's hard to find reasons why Podziemski couldn't potentially surpass a player like Jalen Brunson. Statistically, he is undeniably a superior prospect, devoid of the abysmal rebounding rate that has historically been significant in predicting a guard's transition to the NBA. He also demonstrates greater scoring ability, and is, in my estimation, a superior shooter. Their motors are not comparable. Although I appreciated Brunson coming out of the draft – he had at least one exceptional skill (shooting) and two championship wins, suggesting he contributes to successful basketball - it is hard to see where Brunson could outperform Podziemski.
To be fair, let's consider the potential downside: Brunson had an exceptional finish at the rim, with a 67% ATR (At the Rim) percentage, whereas Podziemski only scored 60% ATR. This is the strongest argument against Podz. Brunson's impressive rim-finishing stats coupled with his shooting ability did indeed project well for his scoring at the NBA level. There is a possibility that Podziemski could be inefficient when attacking the rim in the NBA.
The primary criticisms of Podziemski are his lack of a quick first step, potential difficulty in finishing over NBA length, and his perceived lack of athleticism. However, similar criticisms were made of James Harden, Jalen Brunson, and Tyrese Haliburton. The common thread among these successful players is their ability to adapt and succeed in the face of competition. Intelligence, productivity, and motivation allow them to adapt. Podziemski has demonstrated these qualities at every opportunity, and he still has room for physical improvement.
Selecting athletic individuals who lack a comprehensive understanding of successful basketball can lead to less desirable outcomes than selecting significantly successful basketball players who simply need to adapt their skills to NBA competition. If the latter category of players can translate their skills successfully, their value greatly surpasses the former.
I observe prospects like Jalen Hood Schifino, Nick Smith Jr and Keyontae George being favored over Podziemski, a trend I find perplexing. These players provided mediocre to negative value at the college level due to their inefficiencies and shortcomings in other areas of their game. They are better athletes, but I strongly favor drafting basketball players who can provide quantifiable value on the court.
In conclusion, the analysis and evaluation of Brandin Podziemski's game strongly indicates that he should be considered a top-tier prospect for the NBA draft. His statistical profile, coupled with his ability to contribute significantly in all areas of the game, underscores his exceptional potential. Despite some criticism pertaining to his athleticism and potential for finishing at the rim, Podziemski's history of adaptation and overachievement, starting from a late initiation into the sport in 8th grade to becoming one of the most complete guards in this draft class, paints a picture of a player who can overcome these challenges.
An athletic player lacking the nuances of basketball wisdom can pose greater risk than a comprehensive basketball player who may just require adjustments to the increased competition in the NBA. Podziemski, with his evident basketball acumen, high basketball IQ, and significant contributions in various facets of the game, should undeniably be a priority consideration for any team in the upcoming draft. Has Jokic, Luka, and Steph taught you nothing about this process? Skill + production is king.
In summary, based on quantifiable court value and a demonstrated winning mentality, Brandin Podziemski undoubtedly presents a compelling case for a top 10 pick in the NBA draft.
Update your board before it's too late.
submitted by gosuruss to NBA_Draft [link] [comments]


2023.06.08 08:16 BruteSentiment Daily Minors Quick-Notes 6/7/23 - Whisenhunt Dominates and Bednar Returns

Daily Minors Quick-Notes 6/7/23 - Whisenhunt Dominates and Bednar Returns
Carson Whisenhunt made his Double-A debut, and it was more of the same that he had been handing out all season. And the Giants 2021 1st round pick Will Bednar made his first appearance in a game in nearly a year, which is good news for the Giants. And in a shortened day, Luis Matos hit his second home run in Sacramento.

AAA: Las Vegas 8, Sacramento 5

Link
https://preview.redd.it/vyf1lu5wkq4b1.jpg?width=2496&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=8e39be3fe2ed24fbe72668649ba1d89450f272cf
Sacramento Notes:
  • Sacramento slugged out three home runs, but couldn’t pull out the win against Las Vegas. The home runs knocked in four of the team’s five runs. But Las Vegas got eight runs while getting just two home runs.
  • Luis Matos went 2-for-5 with his second Triple-A home run. It’s a bounce back for Matos after he went hitless in his last game (which he hadn’t done since May 26th). Matos now has a .375/.409/.545 batting line.
https://twitter.com/RiverCats/status/1666641366515056641?s=20
  • First baseman Jacob Nottingham went 1-for-4 with his sixth home run overall this season, and second with Sacramento. In his seven games as a River Cat, Nottingham is batting .423/.516/.692 with a double and two home runs, with one walk and four strikeouts.
https://twitter.com/RiverCats/status/1666639877700722688?s=20
  • The third and final home run was by Michael Gigliotti went 2-for-4, hitting his 3rd home run along with his 9th double. He has a batting line of .257/.371/.400, with nine doubles, a triple, and three home runs, with 24 walks to 26 strikeouts.
https://twitter.com/RiverCats/status/1666659695476740096?s=20
  • DH Joey Bart continued his rehab, going 0-for-2 with a strikeout and two HBP. Luckily, Bart seemed okay after each. In five games in this rehab sting, Bart is 2-for-17 (.118), with two HBP and no walks to eight strikeouts.
  • Shortstop Tyler Fitzgerald went 2-for-5, and got caught stealing for the first time this season. Since the start of June, Fitzgerald is 9-for-23 (.391).
  • Starting pitcher Drew Strotman gave up three runs in 4.0 innings, on five hits and four walks, with two strikeouts. Strotman’s ERA sits at 6.49, and is allowing a .292 batting average in 11 games this season.
  • Reliever Melvin Adón didn’t allow any runs, but struggled with his control. In 2.0 innings, he gave up one hit but also four walks with two strikeouts. Adón now has 27 walks in 26.0 innings, and 35 strikeouts.

AA: Richmond 6, Altona 1

Link
https://preview.redd.it/ebjzf8swkq4b1.jpg?width=2496&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=5ab79aa2ed42fc035e373a00e3055e0b6db2003f
Richmond Notes:
  • Carson Whisenhunt made his Double-A debut, and it was successful as the Squirrels got the win. With five shutout innings, he set the right tone for the game, although it was still scoreless when he exited. But after Altoona scored what would be their only run in the top of the sixth, the Squirrels scored four in the bottom half, led by a Riley Mahan home run, and they would take it.
  • Carson Whisenhunt went 5.0 shutout innings in his Double-A debut, striking out seven with two walks and two hits allowed. That comes after Whisenhunt had a 1.42 ERA in six starts at High-A and a 3.29 ERA in four starts at Low-A. Overall, in 44.0 innings, Whisenhunt has struck out 63 and walked only 14.
https://twitter.com/MiLB/status/1666620811816435712?s=20
  • The rest of the game was handled by Nick Zwack, who walked the first batter he faced and let him score, but held the line the rest of the way. In 4.0 innings, he allowed the one run on three hit and a walk, with six strikeouts.
  • First baseman Riley Mahan went 1-for-4 with the home run, and also added a walk. That was Mahan’s seventh home run of the season, and moved him into the team lead for homers. It broke a 4-game hitless streak for Mahan, but he now has a .191/.217/.389 batting line on the year.
  • DH Vaun Brown was 2-for-5 with a triple, his second at Richmond. After 12 games, that bumps his batting line up to .348/.434/.630, with three doubles, two triples, and two home runs, with five walks to 18 strikeouts.
https://twitter.com/GoSquirrels/status/1666609147633123328?s=20
  • Brett Auerbach was 2-for-3 with a double and a stolen base. The new month has been a turn around for Auerbach, and he’s now 6-for-18 (.333) with a double, and a walk against four strikeouts since the start of the month, against having a .153/.211/.190 batting line on the year.
https://twitter.com/GoSquirrels/status/1666610904991924225?s=20
  • Second baseman Hayden Cantrelle went 2-for-3 with a double, his seventh of the season. It’s his first multi-hit game since May 24th. He’s batting .216/.392/.345 on the year. He also had the most literal rundown as a fielder (seriously, watch this highlight).
https://twitter.com/GoSquirrels/status/1666604073154490368?s=20
  • Center fielder Simon Whiteman went 2-for-4, with two singles and an outfield assist on the day. That put him back above the Mendoza Line after he dipped under it after the last game. Whiteman is now 3-for-14 (.214) with a double since the month of June started up.

High-A: Tri-City 10, Eugene 2

Link
https://preview.redd.it/tvmfjahxkq4b1.jpg?width=2496&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=d3a89388503ff32a67ef736ec9cdf36e418b50c9
Eugene Notes:
  • Despite Eugene batting last, this game was, as all this week will be, played in Washington. This was just ugly from the start, literally, as Tri-City scored all ten of their runs in the first three innings to run away with this game.
  • The offense in this game was mostly thanks to Victor Bericoto, who went 3-for-3 with a walk and his now team-leading home run. He moves ahead of Luis Toribio and Grant McCray with his 9th home run in his 48th game. He’s closing in on his career high, which was 12 home runs he hit in 107 games in 2022. Bericoto now has a batting line of .297/.351/.500.
  • Grant McCray went hitless, but went 0-for-3 with three strikeouts and two walks. That gives McCray 71 strikeouts to 31 walks in 50 games this season. It’s a very slightly better rate from last season, when he had 170 to 67 walks in 120 games.
  • Welcome back Luis Toribio! Toribio has been out since coming out of the May 23rd game, when he drew a walk in his first plate appearance and left immediately. He was 1-for-4 on the day, which keeps his numbers steady, as he’s now got a batting line in .252/.357/.487.
  • It was a rough game for starter Eric Silva, who gave up two runs in an inning of work, on two hits and three walks while striking out two. It was Silva’s shortest start of the season, as his ERA jumped up to 4.19 from 3.82 after this one game.
  • Another pitcher with a rough game was Ty Weber, who gave up a season-high eight runs in 1.2 innings, allowing them on two walks and seven hits, two of which were home runs, while striking out two. That doubles his previous season-high in runs allowed, and jumped his ERA up to 8.25.
  • One reliever that did well was Joe Kemlage, who struck out four in 3.1 innings, allowing just two hits. Kemlage now has a4.61 ERA with 31 strikeouts to 11 walks in 27.1 innings.

Low-A: San Jose 4, Visalia 3

Link
https://preview.redd.it/6j36o65ykq4b1.jpg?width=2496&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=f3e25594ce574beddf8aabed892f7e3bbcf196dc
San Jose Notes:
  • San Jose edged out Visalia with a pair of 2-run innings. The first run San Jose scored came on a bases-loaded HBP, the second HBP in a row, and a sacrifice fly in the 3rd inning. Visalia would tie it, but then San Jose took the lead for good on a 2-run single by Turner Hill in the 6th.
  • Catcher Onil Perez went 2-for-5 on the day with two singles. Perez has a batting line of .311/.379/.400, with 14 walks to 15 strikeouts, and had five doubles, two triples, and a home run.
  • DH Turner Hill went 2-for-5 with two RBI. In six games, Hill is now 9-for-27 (.333) with a double, with two walks and three strikeouts, and five steals.
  • Right fielder Tanner O’Tremba was 1-for-4 with San Jose’s only extra-base hit, a double, with a walk. O’Tremba has 13 doubles now, to go with two triples and three home runs, giving him a batting line of .276/.387/.442.
  • Shortstop Jose Ramos went 1-for-3 with a HBP and two stolen bases. That gives Ramos 13 steals on 14 attempts in 46 games this season, and he’s now batting .213/.314/.328.
  • Starting pitcher Jack Choate gave up a run in 4.0 innings, on two hits and a walk, with five strikeouts. It’s the first run Choate has allowed in his last three appearances. Choate now has a 2.31 ERA with 56 strikeouts to 17 walks in 39.0 innings.
  • Reliever Sean Newcomb gave up a run in 2.0 innings, on two hits, with three strikeouts and no walks. It was Newcomb’s second game with San Jose, and he now has allowed the one run in 3.0 innings, with five strikeouts to no walks.

ACL Black: Scheduled Day Off

ACL: ACL Angels 12, ACL Giants Orange 0

Link
https://preview.redd.it/vc8s3sbzkq4b1.jpg?width=2496&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=41d8f5feaf25f4adde9502cc3a9fbb1a7e826dbb
ACL Giants Orange Notes:
  • Second baseman Armando Alvarez led the Orange team in a bad offensive day, going 2-for-3 with a pair of singles. The 28-year old started the season in Sacramento, but got injured on April 12th, and is rehabbing his way back. In two games at Arizona, went 3-for-6 with a double.
  • Designated hitter Derwin Laya went 1-for-3 with two strikeouts. He’s 4-for-9 (.444) after three games this season.
  • Making his first rehab start was former 1st round pick Will Bednar, who went 2.0 innings, striking out five while allowing a run on two hits and two walks. Bednar was last on the field in an official game on June 12th of last season.

DSL: Scheduled Day Off

submitted by BruteSentiment to SFGiants [link] [comments]


2023.06.08 08:05 Naturaldestintion Small claims against Coinbase in California

I locked my Ethereum (crypto token) with Coinbase in mid-2021. For ~18 months my rewards for staking (locking) accrued on my account regularly.
In December 2022 I noticed the rewards counter disappeared entirely. At some point my rewards started accruing new this year but the 18 months worth have never been seen again.
I contacted custom support. Ive spent hours trying to resolve this with them over the past 6 months. I filed a formal complaint 3 months ago (required before doing small claims) and it was rejected with this text.
“As our Support team has communicated to you, there was a temporary restriction on your account due to an outstanding data request necessary to meet Coinbase’s Know Your Customer requirements which affected the ETH staking for your account. Our engineering team is working on a resolution to provide the ETH accumulated due to your ETH staking. However, we do not have an estimated resolution date at this time. Once a resolution is reached or we have an estimate, we will update you. As a result of the above, Coinbase considers this complaint closed. “
I read this as admitting they are in the wrong and incapable of fixing it. I have more similar replies in written emails from other support agents as well. It has been another month since receiving this and now I cannot even get a reply.
Im ready to file a case with small claims but I have two issues. I dont know how much they owe me. I plan to roughly estimate it though based on average staking yields for the time period and their cut. And the bigger problem is my claim is in dollars but they owe me ETH.
So my question is, is small claims my best course of action at this point? And if so how can I price the claim when whats worth $6k today could be $4k or $8k by the time I may win.
Im hopeful filing the case would get someones attention who can fix it and they would pay me out in ETH and I can be done with it. I dont have twitter or linkedin to try that route. Ive tried to CB subreddit but they take my case number and ghost me.
submitted by Naturaldestintion to legaladvice [link] [comments]